Skip to content

Government & PolicyBreaking

Appeals court allows First Amendment challenge to California law on employer meetings

By

Coverage spectrum

Covered by 3 outlets, all right-leaning.

3 articles in total. The spectrum counts each outlet once and leaves opinion out. How we measure bias

Reason, Just the News and The Center Square report that a three-judge panel of the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on October 29, 2026 that California Senate Bill 399 likely restricts employers’ speech. The law bars employers from disciplining or threatening workers who skip employer-sponsored meetings whose purpose is to communicate the employer’s opinion on religious or political matters. The outlets say the court found the law reaches expressive activity, not only discipline. The panel revived a First Amendment challenge brought by the California Policy Center, and Just the News says the lawsuit could return to district court. According to Just the News, the state argued the nonprofit was likely exempt. The Center Square says the panel upheld a lower court’s block on the law.

Headline and summary written by Mantle’s AI from the coverage below, under published rules. How this works

What happened

Key points

Each point shows who reports it, from Far Left to Far Right.

  1. A three-judge Ninth Circuit panel ruled on October 29, 2026 in Calif. Chamber of Commerce v. Bonta.

    One side only: the rightReported byRight2See the outletsHide the outlets
    Right
    Reason, The Center Square
  2. The panel said California Senate Bill 399 likely violates employers’ First Amendment rights by restricting their speech.

    One side only: the rightReported byRight2See the outletsHide the outlets
    Right
    Reason, The Center Square
  3. SB 399 bars employers from disciplining or threatening employees who decline to attend meetings meant to communicate the employer’s opinion on religious or political matters.

    One side only: the rightReported byRight2Far Right1See the outletsHide the outlets
    Right
    Reason, The Center Square
    Far Right
    Just the News
  4. The panel revived a First Amendment challenge by the California Policy Center, and the case could return to district court.

    One outletJust the News· Far Right

  5. The state argued the California Policy Center was likely exempt from the law, and the court said its planned political discussions could fall outside the exemptions.

    One outletJust the News· Far Right

How each side tells it

Compare views

All three outlets report that a Ninth Circuit panel found California’s SB 399 likely violates employers’ First Amendment rights, and present the ruling as a win for employers against the state law.

  • the left

    No coverage yet

    No left-leaning outlet that Mantle follows has covered this story yet. That absence is part of the picture.

  • the center

    No coverage yet

    No center outlet that Mantle follows has covered this story yet. That absence is part of the picture.

  • the right

    3 outlets

    Headlines present the ruling as a First Amendment win for employers against California; Reason and the Far Right Just the News use procedural wording, while The Center Square states it as a flat verdict.

    California can’t punish employers for sharing political, religious opinions
    The Center SquareRightAll right-leaning headlines

The words they chose

Language to notice

Words that carry a judgement beyond the facts. Tap a highlighted word anywhere on the page to see why.

  • Left

    Has not covered this story.

  • Center

    Has not covered this story.

  • Right1

    crackdowns

In the outlets’ own words

  • Sensational language

    crackdownsMore neutral: enforcement or legal action

    The word suggests harsh, aggressive enforcement that the article does not describe; the coverage concerns lawsuits and state action under a specific statute.

    (Legal Newsline) — California can't punish employers with the threat of lawsuits or crackdowns if they express ownership's political or religious opinions at workplace meetings, a…

    Used byThe Center Square (Right)

See the full language guide

See for yourself

Side by side

What each side leads with and what it leaves out. Open a side to read its headlines.

From the left

0 outlets

No left-leaning outlet that Mantle follows has covered this story yet. That absence is part of the picture.

From the center

0 outlets

No center outlet that Mantle follows has covered this story yet. That absence is part of the picture.

From the right

3 outlets

Leads with

  • employers’ First Amendment rights
  • court ruling against California
  • panel’s mix of Democratic and Republican appointees
See the 3 headlines from the rightHide the headlines
  • California can’t punish employers for sharing political, religious opinions

    (Legal Newsline) — California can't punish employers with the threat of lawsuits or Sensational language“crackdowns”The word suggests harsh, aggressive enforcement that the article does not describe; the coverage concerns lawsuits and state action under a specific statute.More neutral: enforcement or legal actionDisagree with this highlight? if they express ownership's political or religious opinions at workplace meetings, a federal appeals panel has ruled.

  • Just the NewsFar Right

    Appeals court reinstates First Amendment challenge to California restrictions on workplace meetings

    The California Policy Center argues the law limits its ability to hold mandatory employee meetings about political issues central to its work.

  • ReasonRight

    Law Banning Employer Requirements That Employees Listen to Employer's Religious or Political Speech Likely Violates Employer's First Amendment Rights

    From Calif. Chamber of Commerce v. Bonta, decided today by Judge Richard Tallman, joined by Judges Richard Paez and Mark Bennett: California Senate Bill (SB) 399 prohibits an employer from subjecting, or threatening to subject, an employee to adverse action if the employee …

The stories you read build My Mix, a private picture of which sides cover the stories you choose, kept on this device. What is My Mix?

The left is Far Left and Left together. The right is Right and Far Right together. Every outlet keeps its own five-point rating.

Help someone else find the truth beneath the surface

Most people see one side of a story. Share this one, so they can see how every side is telling it and decide for themselves.

Email it
Embed

Show this story’s coverage card on your own site, blog or class page. It has the headline, who is covering it and a link back here, and it tracks nobody. See the card

Seen a mistake? Tell us what is wrong with this page