Crime & JusticeBreaking
Judge dismisses Trump’s defamation suit against Wall Street Journal over Epstein story
By Mantle News
Coverage spectrum
Covered by 12 outlets, mostly left-leaning (66%).
13 articles in total. The spectrum counts each outlet once and leaves opinion out. How we measure bias

A federal judge in Florida, Darrin Gayles, has dismissed President Donald Trump’s defamation lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal, Rupert Murdoch and others over the paper’s reporting on Trump’s ties to Jeffrey Epstein. Outlets on the left, center and right report the ruling. The judge found that Trump did not plausibly allege that the defendants acted with actual malice, the legal standard for public figures. The dismissal is with prejudice, so the case cannot be refiled. The dispute concerns a birthday book Ghislaine Maxwell assembled for Epstein in 2003, which the reporting said included a card allegedly from Trump. Trump first sued the paper in July 2025, and the suit sought $10 billion in damages. A spokesperson for Trump’s legal team said the team would continue to press its case against the paper and its other defendants.
Headline and summary written by Mantle’s AI from the coverage below, under published rules. How this works
What happened
Key points
Each point shows who reports it, from Far Left to Far Right.
A federal judge in Florida, Darrin Gayles, dismissed Trump’s lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal and Rupert Murdoch over the paper’s Epstein reporting.
Reported byFar Left3Left5Center1Right1Far Right1See the outletsHide the outlets
- Far Left
- Raw Story, The Daily Beast, MeidasTouch
- Left
- The Independent, Bloomberg, CNN, CBS News, NBC News
- Center
- CNBC
- Right
- Reason
- Far Right
- Just the News
The dismissal is with prejudice, so the suit cannot be refiled.
Reported byFar Left1Left5Center1See the outletsHide the outlets
- Far Left
- The Daily Beast
- Left
- The Independent, Bloomberg, CNN, CBS News, NBC News
- Center
- CNBC
The judge found that Trump did not show the paper acted with actual malice.
Reported byLeft3Right1Far Right1See the outletsHide the outlets
- Left
- The Independent, CBS News, NBC News
- Right
- Reason
- Far Right
- Just the News
Trump first sued the paper in July 2025, and this was a revised complaint dismissed after an earlier one.
Reported byLeft2Far Right1See the outletsHide the outlets
- Left
- Bloomberg, NBC News
- Far Right
- Just the News
Trump’s suit sought $10 billion in damages.
One side only: the leftReported byFar Left1Left2See the outletsHide the outlets
- Far Left
- The Daily Beast
- Left
- Bloomberg, NBC News
How each side tells it
Compare views
Coverage on all sides reports that federal judge Darrin Gayles dismissed Trump’s lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal over its Epstein reporting. Left outlets stress the dismissal with prejudice and often use sharp wording, while center and right headlines state the ruling plainly.
the left
8 outlets
Left headlines mostly state the dismissal plainly, while far-left outlets add scorn such as fatal blow, desperate and brutal rebuke.
Judge dismisses with prejudice Trump lawsuit against Wall Street Journal
CBS NewsLeftAll left-leaning headlines the center
2 outlets
CNBC’s single headline states the ruling plainly, naming the defendants and the with-prejudice dismissal, with no evaluative language; the center side rests on one outlet.
Trump defamation suit against Murdoch, WSJ over Epstein letter dismissed with prejudice
CNBCCenterAll center headlines the right
2 outlets
Right outlets report the dismissal in neutral terms; Reason hedges Trump’s birthday wishes as alleged, while Far Right Just the News frames it around the Epstein reporting.
Judge dismisses Trump’s lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal over Epstein reporting
Just the NewsFar RightAll right-leaning headlines
The words they chose
Language to notice
Words that carry a judgement beyond the facts. Tap a highlighted word anywhere on the page to see why.
Left8
desperatefork overpedophilenothing but humiliation
Center1
notorious sex offender
Right1
disgraced
In the outlets’ own words
Loaded modifier
disgracedMore neutral: former or who resigned after
Verdict as adjective; say what happened.
…legal action against the publication over its coverage of his relationship with the disgraced financier.
Used byJust the News (Far Right)
Loaded modifier
notorious sex offenderMore neutral: convicted sex offender
Notorious adds a judgement of reputation beyond the conviction that the reporting describes.
…with a story saying the president had sent a "bawdy" 50th birthday letter to notorious sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
Used byCNBC (Center)
Loaded modifier
desperateMore neutral: defamation lawsuit
Calling the lawsuit desperate adds a judgement about Trump’s motives that the ruling does not state.
A federal judge has thrown out President Donald Trump’s desperate defamation lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal and its ownership—this time with…
Used byThe Daily Beast (Far Left)
Loaded verb
fork overMore neutral: seek $10 billion from
The phrase suggests reluctant payment, while the reporting says only that Trump sought $10 billion in damages.
Trump demanded the Journal and its billionaire owners, the Murdoch family, fork over $10 billion over an article accusing Trump of writing an elaborate birthday letter,…
Used byThe Daily Beast (Far Left)
Show 6 more phrasesShow fewer
Loaded modifier
pedophileMore neutral: convicted sex offender
The label goes beyond the conviction the reporting describes, which is a sex offense.
…an elaborate birthday letter, complete with a doodle of a woman’s silhouette to the pedophile Jeffrey Epstein.
Used byThe Daily Beast (Far Left)
Sensational language
nothing but humiliationMore neutral: a dismissal with prejudice
The phrase characterizes the outcome for Trump in dramatic terms rather than stating the ruling.
He’s leaving with nothing but humiliation.
Used byThe Daily Beast (Far Left)
Sensational language
lewdMore neutral: sexually suggestive
“Lewd” is a moral judgement about the letter; the Independent’s neutral description is sexually suggestive.
…Trump’s defamation lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal over its reporting on a lewd birthday letter to Jeffrey Epstein bearing Trump’s name.
Used byCNN (Left)
Sensational language
blisteringMore neutral: In a 20-page ruling
The word describes the tone of the ruling rather than its content, adding emotional weight.
In a blistering 20-page ruling issued Saturday, U.S.
Used byMeidasTouch (Far Left)
Sensational language
stinging defeatMore neutral: a loss for the president in the case
The phrase characterizes the president's loss emotionally rather than stating the outcome of the case.
…lawsuit with prejudice, delivering a major victory for press freedom and a stinging defeat to the president, who had sued the newspaper, its journalists, and media mogul…
Used byMeidasTouch (Far Left)
Sensational language
Brutal First Amendment RebukeMore neutral: Judge Dismisses Trump’s Epstein Lawsuit Against Wall Street Journal on First Amendment Grounds
The adjective brutal adds drama to a routine court dismissal that a neutral headline can report without it.
Judge Throws Out Trump's Epstein Lawsuit Against Wall Street Journal in Brutal First Amendment Rebuke
Used byMeidasTouch (Far Left)
See for yourself
Side by side
What each side leads with and what it leaves out. Open a side to read its headlines.
From the left
8 outletsLeads with
- dismissal with prejudice, no refiling
- $10 billion damages sought
- Epstein birthday letter story
- First Amendment and press reporting
See the 8 headlines from the leftHide the headlines
- NBC NewsLeft
Judge dismisses Trump’s $10 billion defamation suit over Jeffrey Epstein birthday card story
A federal judge in Florida has tossed a revised version of President Donald Trump’s $10 billion defamation suit against the Wall Street Journal over a story about a birthday card he allegedly sent Jeffrey Epstein more than two decades ago.
- CBS NewsLeft
Judge dismisses with prejudice Trump lawsuit against Wall Street Journal
In a 20-page ruling, U.S. District Judge Darrin Gayles in Miami dismissed the suit with prejudice, ruling that President Trump did not prove the defendants made defamatory statements with actual malice.
- MeidasTouchFar Left
Judge Throws Out Trump's Epstein Lawsuit Against Wall Street Journal in Sensational language“Brutal First Amendment Rebuke”The adjective brutal adds drama to a routine court dismissal that a neutral headline can report without it.More neutral: Judge Dismisses Trump’s Epstein Lawsuit Against Wall Street Journal on First Amendment GroundsDisagree with this highlight?
The federal judge rejected Trump's attempt to turn his denials into a veto over unfavorable reporting—and now the president could be on the hook for the newspaper's legal fees.
- CNNLeft
Judge tosses Trump’s lawsuit against Wall Street Journal again, this time for good
A federal judge on Saturday dismissed President Donald Trump’s defamation lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal over its reporting on a Sensational language“lewd”“Lewd” is a moral judgement about the letter; the Independent’s neutral description is sexually suggestive.More neutral: sexually suggestiveDisagree with this highlight? birthday letter to Jeffrey Epstein bearing Trump’s name. US District Judge Darrin P. …
- BloombergLeft
WSJ Wins Dismissal of Trump’s $10 Billion Defamation Suit
A federal judge threw out Donald Trump’s renewed $10 billion defamation lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal and ruled that it can’t be filed again, marking another setback for the president’s legal fights with the press.
- The Daily BeastFar Left
Judge Tosses Trump Defamation Lawsuit Over Epstein Letter
A federal judge has thrown out President Donald Trump’s Loaded modifier“desperate”Calling the lawsuit desperate adds a judgement about Trump’s motives that the ruling does not state.More neutral: defamation lawsuitDisagree with this highlight? defamation lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal and its ownership—this time with prejudice. …
- The IndependentLeft
Judge permanently throws out Trump’s Wall Street Journal defamation lawsuit over Epstein letter story
The president failed to show the newspaper acted with ‘actual malice’ by publishing sexually suggestive birthday note
- Raw StoryFar Left
Trump’s Epstein birthday letter lawsuit dealt fatal blow by judge: 'He has failed'
U.S. District Judge Darrin P. Gayles on Saturday tossed President Donald Trump’s lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal over its reporting on a birthday letter Trump allegedly wrote to Jeffrey Epstein — a decisive blow to the president’s case against the paper. …
From the center
2 outletsLeads with
- dismissal with prejudice
- named defendants Murdoch and the Journal
- Epstein letter story
See the 2 headlines from the centerHide the headlines
Judge dismisses Trump suit against Wall Street Journal over Epstein birthday letter
U.S. District Judge Darrin Gayles in Miami dismissed the suit with prejudice, ruling that the president did not prove the defendants made defamatory statements with actual malice as required by law.
- CNBCCenter
Trump defamation suit against Murdoch, WSJ over Epstein letter dismissed with prejudice
A federal judge in Florida on Saturday dismissed President Donald Trump's amended lawsuit with prejudice against media baron Rupert Murdoch and The Wall Street Journal, which claimed the newspaper defamed Trump with a story saying the president had sent a "bawdy" 50th birthday …
From the right
2 outletsLeads with
- judge’s actual malice finding
- the Journal’s Epstein reporting
- Trump’s alleged birthday wishes
Leaves out
- $10 billion damages sought
- dismissal is with prejudice
Reported by other sides, not found in this side’s coverage.
See the 2 headlines from the rightHide the headlines
- ReasonRight
Trump vs. WSJ Libel Lawsuit Over Trump's Alleged Birthday Wishes to Epstein Thrown Out
The court concludes that Trump hadn't adequately alleged facts supporting a showing that the Journal published the article knowing that it was likely false.
- Just the NewsFar Right
Judge dismisses Trump’s lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal over Epstein reporting
U.S. District Judge Darrin Gayles of the Southern District of Florida found that Trump did not establish that the newspaper acted with “actual malice” in publishing its reporting.
1 more from Just the News
The stories you read build My Mix, a private picture of which sides cover the stories you choose, kept on this device. What is My Mix?
The left is Far Left and Left together. The right is Right and Far Right together. Every outlet keeps its own five-point rating.
Who reported it when
How the coverage built up
Left
First to report
Raw Story, Oct 31, 3:51 PM EDT
Center
5 min later
Its first report, Oct 31, 3:56 PM EDT
Right
31 min later
Its first report, Oct 31, 4:23 PM EDT
See the order the outlets reported inHide the order
- Raw StoryFar LeftOct 31, 3:51 PM EDT
- CNBCCenterOct 31, 3:56 PM EDT
- The IndependentLeftOct 31, 3:59 PM EDT
- The Daily BeastFar LeftOct 31, 4:11 PM EDT
- ReasonRightOct 31, 4:23 PM EDT
- BloombergLeftOct 31, 4:23 PM EDT
- CNNLeftOct 31, 4:26 PM EDT
- MeidasTouchFar LeftOct 31, 4:40 PM EDT
- CBS NewsLeftOct 31, 4:59 PM EDT
- NBC NewsLeftOct 31, 5:09 PM EDT
- PBS NewsHourCenterOct 31, 5:32 PM EDT
Times are the ones the outlets published in their own feeds, in Eastern time. Opinion is left out. Just the News gave only a date, so it is not placed.
Read next
More on Crime & Justice
WorldDeveloping
Protesters rally across France for a third weekend; some clash with police
15 outlets
More on Crime & Justice
WorldBreaking
Flávio Bolsonaro leaves Brazil after losing runoff; Rubio says US did not help
3 outlets
Next in today’s stories
PoliticsDeveloping
Justice Department sues to block Alaska Senate certification if Republican loses
40 outlets
Next in today’s stories
Crime & JusticeBreaking
One dead and six injured in shooting at Fairfield, California, Halloween store
15 outlets
A story one side mostly skipped
Immigration & BorderDeveloping
DHS says CBS was warned a deported Texas father had claimed he was gay in asylum case
14 outletsQuiet in the center