Skip to content

Business & MarketsDeveloping

Oil tanker charter rates hit records as crude moves through Strait of Hormuz

By

Coverage spectrum

Covered by 4 outlets, mostly center (75%).

5 articles in total. The spectrum counts each outlet once and leaves opinion out. How we measure bias

Two large crude oil tankers moored side by side at an offshore terminal under grey sky.
Image via Financial TimesHow images are chosenReport this image

Charter rates for oil tankers have reached record levels as crude moves out of the Strait of Hormuz during the war in the Persian Gulf. According to Semafor, citing Baltic Exchange data, the cost of hiring one very large crude carrier to move US oil to Asia topped $77 million, more than 700 percent above its 2025 average. CNBC reported that a supertanker was chartered for $76 million from the US Gulf Coast to China, where a pre-war rate would have been $7 million to $10 million. Semafor reported that crude leaving the strait averaged about 10 million barrels a day over the past week, even as attacks on tankers rose. Al Jazeera, citing a Financial Times report, said some tanker captains are earning base salaries of up to $100,000 plus a $50,000 bonus per voyage through the strait.

Headline and summary written by Mantle’s AI from the coverage below, under published rules. How this works

What happened

Key points

Each point shows who reports it, from Far Left to Far Right.

  1. Hiring one very large crude carrier to move US oil to Asia cost more than $77 million, according to Baltic Exchange data.

    One outletSemafor· Center

  2. A supertanker was chartered from the US Gulf Coast to China for $76 million, a source told CNBC; a normal pre-war rate for the route would be $7 million to $10 million.

    One outletCNBC· Center

  3. Crude exiting the Strait of Hormuz averaged about 10 million barrels a day over the past week, according to Semafor.

    One outletSemafor· Center

  4. Attacks on tankers rose across several areas, including off Qatar and in Bulgarian waters.

    One outletSemafor· Center

  5. A US oil trader reportedly took a $2 billion bet on tankers as carriers avoided the strait.

    One outletFinancial Times· Center

  6. Some tanker captains are reportedly earning base salaries of up to $100,000 plus a $50,000 bonus per voyage through the strait, according to a Financial Times report.

    One outletAl Jazeera English· Left

What is contested

Where accounts differ

Points the coverage does not agree on, and who says what.

  • Whether more or fewer ships and barrels are moving through the Strait of Hormuz.

    Al Jazeera reports that shipping traffic through the strait fell to its lowest level since July in the week it covered. Semafor reports that crude exiting the strait averaged about 10 million barrels a day over the past week, and Al Jazeera's own further text says Middle East oil exports rose above pre-war levels at the end of last month. The sources measure different things, total shipping traffic and crude exports.

How each side tells it

Compare views

  • the left

    1 outlet

    Al Jazeera's headline, The Hormuz bonus: Sailor salaries soar for transits amid Iran war, leads with crew pay and frames the strait as a site of danger tied to the Iran war; its coverage is a single article, so this is the only left-side view in the sample.

    The Hormuz bonus: Sailor salaries soar for transits amid Iran war
    Al Jazeera EnglishLeftAll left-leaning headlines
  • the center

    3 outlets

    Center headlines focus on shipping costs and tanker supply: the Financial Times on a $2bn trader bet, CNBC on a $76 million supertanker charter, and Semafor on record tanker hiring costs and rising attacks.

    Rates for oil tankers hit record high, as more crude passes through Hormuz
    SemaforCenterAll center headlines
  • the right

    No coverage yet

    No right-leaning outlet that Mantle follows has covered this story yet. That absence is part of the picture.

The words they chose

Language to notice

Words that carry a judgement beyond the facts. Tap a highlighted word anywhere on the page to see why.

  • Left1

    besieged

  • Center2

    gamblestaggering

  • Right

    Has not covered this story.

In the outlets’ own words

  • Sensational language

    gambleMore neutral: bet

    The word presents a $2bn investment as a risky wager, a judgement the headline does not need to make.

    US oil trader takes $2bn gamble on tankers as carriers steer clear of Hormuz

    Used byFinancial Times (Center)

  • Sensational language

    staggeringMore neutral: the numbers

    The adjective tells the reader how to feel about the figures rather than letting the numbers speak.

    The Baltic Exchange reported the staggering numbers as attacks on tankers rose across multiple theaters of war.

    Used bySemafor (Center)

  • Loaded modifier

    besiegedMore neutral: the Strait of Hormuz

    The word casts the strait as under attack by a party, a characterization the excerpt does not establish.

    As shipping traffic through the besieged Strait of Hormuz fell to its lowest level since July this week, reports have emerged…

    Used byAl Jazeera English (Left)

See the full language guide

See for yourself

Side by side

What each side leads with and what it leaves out. Open a side to read its headlines.

From the left

1 outlet

Leads with

  • crew pay and per-voyage bonuses
  • a besieged strait with falling traffic
  • the Iran war as backdrop

Leaves out

  • record tanker charter costs of $76 million to $77 million reported by center outlets
  • crude exiting the strait averaging about 10 million barrels a day

Reported by other sides, not found in this side’s coverage.

See the headline from the leftHide the headlines

From the center

3 outlets

Leads with

  • record charter and shipping costs
  • tanker shortage and supply
  • US oil flows to Asia
  • attacks on tankers

Leaves out

  • tanker crew pay and per-voyage bonuses for Hormuz transits
  • strait traffic falling to its lowest level since July

Reported by other sides, not found in this side’s coverage.

See the 3 headlines from the centerHide the headlines

From the right

0 outlets

No right-leaning outlet that Mantle follows has covered this story yet. That absence is part of the picture.

Articles you open from here build My Mix, a private picture of how your reading spreads across the spectrum, kept on this device. What is My Mix?

The left is Far Left and Left together. The right is Right and Far Right together. Every outlet keeps its own five-point rating.

Who reported it when

How the coverage built up

  • Left

    20 hr later

    Its first report, Oct 8, 7:02 AM EDT

  • Center

    First to report

    Financial Times, Oct 7, 11:00 AM EDT

  • Right

    No report yet

    From the outlets Mantle follows

See the order the outlets reported inHide the order
  1. Financial TimesCenterOct 7, 11:00 AM EDT
  2. CNBCCenterOct 7, 2:50 PM EDT
  3. SemaforCenterOct 7, 6:30 PM EDT
  4. Al Jazeera EnglishLeftOct 8, 7:02 AM EDT

Times are the ones the outlets published in their own feeds, in Eastern time. Opinion is left out.

Help someone else find the truth beneath the surface

Most people see one side of a story. Share this one, so they can see how every side is telling it and decide for themselves.

Email it

Seen a mistake? Tell us what is wrong with this page