WorldBreaking
UN General Assembly again votes to condemn US economic embargo on Cuba
By Mantle News
Coverage spectrum
Covered by 6 outlets, mostly left-leaning (67%).
8 articles in total. The spectrum counts each outlet once and leaves opinion out. How we measure bias

The UN General Assembly voted again to condemn the US economic embargo on Cuba, for the 34th year. Just the News reports 134 votes in favor and 25 abstentions, and gives two different figures for the votes against, 15 and 17. Bloomberg and The Independent report that fewer countries backed the resolution than last year, with some nations sitting out or voting no for the first time, after a push by the Trump administration. The Independent also reports that a Trump official had a shouting match with Cuban delegates the day before the vote. Just the News reports that the resolution is not legally binding.
Headline and summary written by Mantle’s AI from the coverage below, under published rules. How this works
What happened
Key points
Each point shows who reports it, from Far Left to Far Right.
The UN General Assembly voted again to call for an end to the US economic embargo on Cuba, the 34th year it has done so.
Reported byLeft2Far Right1See the outletsHide the outlets
- Left
- The Independent, Bloomberg
- Far Right
- Just the News
The vote was reported as 134 in favor and 25 abstentions; reports give 15 or 17 votes against.
One outletJust the News· Far Right
Fewer countries backed the resolution than last year, and more countries opposed it or sat out, which Bloomberg describes as the most opposing votes ever.
Reported byLeft1Far Right1See the outletsHide the outlets
- Left
- Bloomberg
- Far Right
- Just the News
The Independent reports that a Trump official had a shouting match with Cuban delegates at the UN the day before the vote.
One outletThe Independent· Left
The resolution is not legally binding.
One outletJust the News· Far Right
What is contested
Where accounts differ
Points the coverage does not agree on, and who says what.
The shift in votes against the embargo resulted from pressure by the Trump administration.
Bloomberg reports a push by the Trump administration to curb support, and The Independent says countries caved to Trump. Just the News reports the opposing and abstaining nations but does not attribute the shift to US pressure in its supplied text.
The number of votes against the resolution.
Just the News gives 134 in favor and reports 15 votes against in its description and 17 in its excerpt, so its own figures disagree. Other supplied coverage gives no count.
How each side tells it
Compare views
Every side reports the UN General Assembly again condemned the US embargo on Cuba for the 34th year, with more countries opposing or sitting out than before. Left-rated outlets center the Trump administration’s push on countries; the right-rated report centers the vote count and the non-binding resolution.
the left
4 outlets
Left-rated headlines frame the vote as Trump administration pressure: The Independent says countries cave to Trump, and Bloomberg says the US wins over 23 more countries.
Some countries Loaded verb“cave to Trump”Describes countries changing their votes as giving in, which assumes the reason without establishing it.More neutral: change position on Trump-backedDisagree with this highlight? and sit out of UN vote over Cuba embargo for first time in 34 years
The IndependentLeftAll left-leaning headlines the center
No coverage yet
No center outlet that Mantle follows has covered this story yet. That absence is part of the picture.
the right
2 outlets
Right-rated headlines lead with the UN condemning the embargo and the nations that opposed or abstained, while the Washington Times, republishing an AP report, stresses tensions spilling into public.
UN votes to condemn US economic embargo on Cuba, but more nations oppose the measure or abstain
Just the NewsFar RightAll right-leaning headlines
The words they chose
Language to notice
Words that carry a judgement beyond the facts. Tap a highlighted word anywhere on the page to see why.
Left3
underminecave to TrumpWins Over
Center
Has not covered this story.
Right0
No loaded words in its own voice.
In the outlets’ own words
Loaded verb
undermineMore neutral: campaign against Cuba’s socialist government
Describes the administration’s aim as undermining a government, which assumes an intent the excerpt does not establish.
economic embargo on Cuba as the Trump administration intensifies its campaign to undermine Cuba’s socialist government
Used byABC News (Left)
Loaded verb
cave to TrumpMore neutral: change position on Trump-backed
Describes countries changing their votes as giving in, which assumes the reason without establishing it.
Some countries cave to Trump and sit out of UN vote over Cuba embargo for first time in 34 years
Used byThe Independent (Left)
Loaded verb
Wins OverMore neutral: Adds 23 More Countries Opposing
Presents a count of votes as a contest won by one government, which frames a diplomatic vote as a victory.
US Wins Over 23 More Countries in UN Vote Against Cuba Embargo
Used byBloomberg (Left)
See for yourself
Side by side
What each side leads with and what it leaves out. Open a side to read its headlines.
From the left
4 outletsLeads with
- Trump administration pressure
- countries sitting out the vote
- shouting match with Cuban delegates
- number of nations opposing
Leaves out
- the 134-vote tally and 25 abstentions
- that the resolution is not legally binding
Reported by other sides, not found in this side’s coverage.
See the 4 headlines from the leftHide the headlines
UN votes to condemn embargo of Cuba despite US lobbying push
US points to increase in abstentions in General Assembly as evidence that push to isolate Cuba is slowly succeeding.
- BloombergLeft
US Loaded verb“Wins Over”Presents a count of votes as a contest won by one government, which frames a diplomatic vote as a victory.More neutral: Adds 23 More Countries OpposingDisagree with this highlight? 23 More Countries in UN Vote Against Cuba Embargo
The United Nations General Assembly again called for the end of the US embargo on Cuba in a symbolic vote, but the number of countries opposing the motion was the most ever after a push by President Donald Trump’s administration to curb support.
- The IndependentLeft
Some countries Loaded verb“cave to Trump”Describes countries changing their votes as giving in, which assumes the reason without establishing it.More neutral: change position on Trump-backedDisagree with this highlight? and sit out of UN vote over Cuba embargo for first time in 34 years
The vote came a day after a Trump official got into a shouting match with Cuban delegates at the U.N. General Assembly
UN holds annual vote on condemning US embargo on Cuba as tensions spill into public
The United Nations is set to vote on a resolution condemning the decades-long U.S. economic embargo on Cuba as the Trump administration intensifies its campaign to Loaded verb“undermine”Describes the administration’s aim as undermining a government, which assumes an intent the excerpt does not establish.More neutral: campaign against Cuba’s socialist governmentDisagree with this highlight? Cuba’s socialist government
Also published by The Washington Times. It counts once.
From the center
0 outletsNo center outlet that Mantle follows has covered this story yet. That absence is part of the picture.
From the right
2 outletsLeads with
- the UN vote condemning the embargo
- nations opposing or abstaining
- vote tally and abstentions
- resolution not legally binding
Leaves out
- Trump official’s shouting match with Cuban delegates
- Trump administration push on countries
Reported by other sides, not found in this side’s coverage.
See the 2 headlines from the rightHide the headlines
- Just the NewsFar Right
UN votes to condemn US economic embargo on Cuba, but more nations oppose the measure or abstain
The vote was 134-15, and 25 nations abstained, which was a considerable decrease in support for the condemnation over last year.
1 more from Just the News
U.N. holds annual vote on condemning U.S. embargo on Cuba as tensions spill into public
The Washington Times published a report that is shown in full at ABC News.
The stories you read build My Mix, a private picture of which sides cover the stories you choose, kept on this device. What is My Mix?
The left is Far Left and Left together. The right is Right and Far Right together. Every outlet keeps its own five-point rating.
Who reported it when
How the coverage built up
Left
First to report
ABC News, Oct 28, 12:11 AM EDT
Center
No report yet
From the outlets Mantle follows
Right
6 hr 58 min later
Its first report, Oct 28, 7:09 AM EDT
See the order the outlets reported inHide the order
- ABC NewsLeftOct 28, 12:11 AM EDT
- The Washington TimesRightOct 28, 7:09 AM EDT
- The IndependentLeftOct 28, 12:03 PM EDT
- BloombergLeftOct 28, 12:25 PM EDT
- Al Jazeera EnglishLeftOct 28, 4:22 PM EDT
Times are the ones the outlets published in their own feeds, in Eastern time. Opinion is left out. Just the News gave only a date, so it is not placed.
Read next
More on World
Crime & JusticeBreaking
Federal judge Alvin Hellerstein, who oversaw the Maduro case, dies at 92
14 outlets
More on World
PoliticsDeveloping
Partial counts show Netanyahu’s bloc ahead in Israeli election, with no majority yet
19 outlets
Next in today’s stories
EconomyBreaking
Federal Reserve holds interest rates steady at 3.75% to 4% amid elevated inflation
26 outlets
29 outlets
A story one side mostly skipped
Immigration & BorderDeveloping
Texas man deported to Ghana says he was then sent to Mali; DHS responds to CBS report
13 outletsQuiet in the center