Skip to content

TechnologyDeveloping

Altman Says World Should Accept ‘Some Bad Things’ for AI’s Benefits

By

Coverage spectrum

Covered by 7 outlets, mostly left-leaning (71%).

8 articles in total, 1 of them opinion. The spectrum counts each outlet once and leaves opinion out. How we measure bias

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said in an interview with Politico’s Decoded that “the world should accept some bad things happening for the benefits of this technology and people having the agency” to use it widely. Altman contrasted OpenAI’s “lighter-touch” regulatory stance with that of rival Anthropic, which he said represents a stricter safety philosophy, saying there is “a lot of daylight” between the two companies. He said he would not trade AI’s benefits for a guarantee of “zero” hacks, scams or misuse. The Guardian reported the remarks drew swift criticism online and came after an OpenAI safety researcher resigned, saying the company’s “culture is broken.”

Headline and summary written by Mantle’s AI from the coverage below, under published rules. How this works

What happened

Key points

Each point shows who reports it, from Far Left to Far Right.

  1. Sam Altman said the world should accept “some bad things happening” for the benefits of AI technology.

    Reported byLeftRight

  2. The remarks were made in an interview with Politico’s Decoded, published Monday.

    Reported byLeftRight

  3. Altman said there is “a lot of daylight” between OpenAI and Anthropic on regulation, calling his approach “lighter-touch.”

    Reported byLeftRight

  4. Altman said he would not accept a trade-off guaranteeing zero hacks, scams or misuse of AI.

    Reported byLeftRight

  5. The Guardian reported the comments sparked backlash from AI critics and followed the resignation of an OpenAI safety researcher who said the company’s “culture is broken.”

    Reported byLeft

How each side tells it

Compare views

  • the left

    5 outlets

    Most left outlets quote Altman’s “bad things” remark directly, with The Daily Beast framing it in markedly more alarmed terms than Business Insider and The Guardian, which present it more descriptively.

    Why Are We Paying So Much Attention to Sam Altman?
    The New RepublicFar LeftAll left-leaning headlines
  • the center

    0 outlets · 1 opinion

    Mantle’s analysis has no note on this side yet. One of its headlines is shown.

    Sam Altman admits we should accept 'some bad things' for sake of AI supremacy
    The HillCenterAll center headlines
  • the right

    2 outlets

    Breitbart’s headline presents Altman’s quote directly and frames the story around the OpenAI–Anthropic policy divide, including criticism of Anthropic from Trump-aligned advisers.

    Sam Altman Says 'Some Bad Things' Will Happen With AI. That Doesn't Mean We Should Stop It.
    ReasonRightAll right-leaning headlines

The words they chose

Language to notice

Words that carry a judgement beyond the facts. Tap a highlighted word anywhere on the page to see why.

  • Left3

    chilling messageTerrifying Proclamationsparked an instant backlash

  • Center0

    No loaded words in its own voice.

  • Right0

    No loaded words in its own voice.

In the outlets’ own words

  • Sensational language

    chilling messageMore neutral: message about trade-offs

    Adds a dramatic, fear-based characterization not present in Altman’s own words.

    OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has delivered a chilling message about the trade-offs he believes humans should accept to develop artificial…

    Used byThe Daily Beast (Far Left)

  • Sensational language

    Terrifying ProclamationMore neutral: Controversial Statement

    Labels Altman’s statement as terrifying rather than describing its content neutrally.

    AI Boss Makes Terrifying Proclamation

    Used byThe Daily Beast (Far Left)

  • Vague attribution

    sparked an instant backlashMore neutral: drew criticism from some AI safety advocates

    Claims a backlash occurred without identifying who specifically reacted or how widely.

    …hacks, scams and “other bad things that will happen” in an interview that sparked an instant backlash from critics of the major AI companies.

    Used byThe Guardian (Left)

See the full language guide

See for yourself

Side by side

What each side leads with and what it leaves out. Open a side to read its headlines.

From the left

5 outlets

Leads with

  • Altman’s direct quote on accepting risk
  • contrast with Anthropic’s safety stance
  • The Guardian adds context of backlash and a researcher’s resignation

Leaves out

  • Criticism of Anthropic’s regulatory-capture motives raised by Trump-aligned advisers (noted on the right)

Reported by other sides, not found in this side’s coverage.

See the 5 headlines from the leftHide the headlines
  • Why Are We Paying So Much Attention to Sam Altman?

    OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has been on a real media blitz. But whether he’s doing damage control for his company’s recent scandals or participating in a new Luca Guadagnino biopic , it hasn’t seemed to improve his image. …

  • AI safety groups aren’t buying OpenAI’s spending retreat

    They want stronger commitments to reduce the money AI super PACs push into the midterms.

  • Accept ‘bad things’ in return for benefits of AI, says Sam Altman

    Boss of OpenAI calls for a regulatory light touch because of the ‘good stuff’ the technology can deliver Sam Altman says he believes the world should accept “bad things” happening with AI in exchange for the benefits of the technology. …

  • AI Boss Makes Sensational language“Terrifying Proclamation”Labels Altman’s statement as terrifying rather than describing its content neutrally.More neutral: Controversial StatementDisagree with this highlight?

    OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has delivered a Sensational language“chilling message”Adds a dramatic, fear-based characterization not present in Altman’s own words.More neutral: message about trade-offsDisagree with this highlight? about the trade-offs he believes humans should accept to develop artificial intelligence. …

  • Sam Altman said 'the world should accept some bad things happening' for the benefits of AI

    Sam Altman said he does not accept "the really catastrophic risks" of AI, believing that people will do "more good stuff than bad stuff."

From the center

0 outlets · 1 opinion
See the headline from the centerHide the headlines
  • The HillCenterOpinion

    Sam Altman admits we should accept 'some bad things' for sake of AI supremacy

    As AI gets better and better, we’re going to have to learn to stomach some negative outcomes in exchange for vast prosperity and improvements in our overall health, wealth and life expectancy.

From the right

2 outlets

Leads with

  • Altman’s quote on accepting risk
  • OpenAI vs. Anthropic regulatory divide
  • criticism of Anthropic over alleged regulatory capture

Leaves out

  • Backlash from AI critics and the OpenAI safety researcher’s resignation (reported on the left)

Reported by other sides, not found in this side’s coverage.

See the 2 headlines from the rightHide the headlines
  • ReasonRight

    Sam Altman Says 'Some Bad Things' Will Happen With AI. That Doesn't Mean We Should Stop It.

    Progress has always required accepting risk.

  • OpenAI Boss Sam Altman: The World Must Accept 'Some Bad Things Happening' for AI to Succeed

    Sam Altman told Decoded by Politico that OpenAI and Anthropic remain far apart on how much risk society should tolerate from AI. According to Altman, the "world should accept some bad things happening for the benefits of this technology."

Articles you open from here build My Mix, a private picture of how your reading spreads across the spectrum, kept on this device. What is My Mix?

The left is Far Left and Left together. The right is Right and Far Right together. Every outlet keeps its own five-point rating.

Who reported it when

How the coverage built up

  • Left

    First to report

    Business Insider, Oct 4, 5:01 PM EDT

  • Center

    No report yet

    From the outlets Mantle follows

  • Right

    20 hr 25 min later

    Its first report, Oct 5, 1:25 PM EDT

See the order the outlets reported inHide the order
  1. Business InsiderLeftOct 4, 5:01 PM EDT
  2. The Daily BeastFar LeftOct 4, 11:59 PM EDT
  3. The GuardianLeftOct 5, 8:13 AM EDT
  4. Breitbart NewsFar RightOct 5, 1:25 PM EDT
  5. PoliticoLeftOct 5, 8:30 PM EDT
  6. The New RepublicFar LeftOct 6, 11:15 AM EDT
  7. ReasonRightOct 6, 11:40 AM EDT

Times are the ones the outlets published in their own feeds, in Eastern time. Opinion is left out.

Help someone else find the truth beneath the surface

Most people see one side of a story. Share this one, so they can see how every side is telling it and decide for themselves.

Email it

Seen a mistake? Tell us what is wrong with this page