Government & PolicyBreaking
Appeals Court Upholds Kansas Ban on Third-Party Prefilled Mail Ballot Applications
By Mantle News
Coverage spectrum
Covered by 3 outlets, all right-leaning.
3 articles in total. The spectrum counts each outlet once and leaves opinion out. How we measure bias

The Federalist, The Epoch Times and Reason report that a unanimous three-judge panel of the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a Kansas law barring private parties from partially prefilling applications for mail ballots before they are sent to registered voters. The outlets say the panel reversed a district court that had found the law was enacted to suppress speech supporting mail-in voting, and applied intermediate scrutiny to find it constitutional. The Kansas legislature passed the law in 2021 over the veto of Governor Laura Kelly. VoteAmerica and the Voter Participation Center had sued, arguing the law infringed on First Amendment speech rights.
Headline and summary written by Mantle’s AI from the coverage below, under published rules. How this works
What happened
Key points
Each point shows who reports it, from Far Left to Far Right.
A three-judge panel of the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the Kansas law barring private parties from partially prefilling mail ballot applications.
One side only: the rightReported byRight1Far Right2See the outletsHide the outlets
- Right
- Reason
- Far Right
- The Federalist, The Epoch Times
The panel ruled unanimously, and its opinion was written by Judge Timothy Tymkovich.
One side only: the rightReported byRight1Far Right2See the outletsHide the outlets
- Right
- Reason
- Far Right
- The Federalist, The Epoch Times
The Kansas legislature passed the law in 2021, overriding the veto of Governor Laura Kelly.
One side only: the rightReported byFar Right2See the outletsHide the outlets
- Far Right
- The Federalist, The Epoch Times
According to the court, the law was meant to reduce voter confusion and increase confidence in elections.
One side only: the rightReported byRight1Far Right1See the outletsHide the outlets
- Right
- Reason
- Far Right
- The Epoch Times
A district court had ruled the law was enacted to suppress speech supporting mail-in voting, and the appeals court reversed that ruling.
One outletReason· Right
VoteAmerica and the Voter Participation Center sued, arguing the law violated First Amendment speech rights.
One side only: the rightReported byRight1Far Right1See the outletsHide the outlets
- Right
- Reason
- Far Right
- The Federalist
What is contested
Where accounts differ
Points the coverage does not agree on, and who says what.
The Kansas law was enacted to suppress speech supporting mail-in voting.
The district court found an improper purpose, inferring it from the political reaction against mail-in voting and Kansas's failure to prove an adequate fit between its interests and the law. The Tenth Circuit reversed, saying the district court found an improper purpose without evidence from the law's justifications, text or legislative history.
How each side tells it
Compare views
The Federalist, The Epoch Times and Reason report that a unanimous three-judge panel upheld Kansas's ban on third parties prefilling mail ballot applications. The main difference is tone: The Federalist's description calls the ruling a win for election integrity, while the other two outlets' headlines report the holding neutrally.
the left
No coverage yet
No left-leaning outlet that Mantle follows has covered this story yet. That absence is part of the picture.
the center
No coverage yet
No center outlet that Mantle follows has covered this story yet. That absence is part of the picture.
the right
3 outlets
Headlines report the appeals court upholding Kansas's ban on prefilled applications; The Federalist's description calls it a win for election integrity, while the Reason and Epoch Times headlines stay neutral.
Court Upholds Kansas Ban on Prefilled Ballot Applications
The Epoch TimesFar RightAll right-leaning headlines
The words they chose
Language to notice
Words that carry a judgement beyond the facts. Tap a highlighted word anywhere on the page to see why.
Left
Has not covered this story.
Center
Has not covered this story.
Right1
win for election integrity
In the outlets’ own words
Partisan shorthand
win for election integrityMore neutral: a ruling in favor of the state law
Calling the ruling a win for election integrity adopts one side's name for the law instead of describing what the court decided.
In a win for election integrity, a federal appellate court upheld on Wednesday a Kansas law prohibiting…
Used byThe Federalist (Far Right)
Words quoted from someone else (1)Hide the quoted words
Loaded words that outlets reported someone else saying. They show what was said, not how the outlet chose to say it.
Loaded verb
Quotedflooded votersMore neutral: were sent to voters in large numbers
The verb presents mailed applications as an overwhelming flood, a dramatic image for a claim the excerpt does not test.
“Kansas acted after error-filled, prefilled mail-ballot applications flooded voters and overwhelmed county election officials in 2020.
Quoted byThe Federalist (Far Right)
These are Jason Snead’s words. The outlets are reporting them.
See for yourself
Side by side
What each side leads with and what it leaves out. Open a side to read its headlines.
From the left
0 outletsNo left-leaning outlet that Mantle follows has covered this story yet. That absence is part of the picture.
From the center
0 outletsNo center outlet that Mantle follows has covered this story yet. That absence is part of the picture.
From the right
3 outletsLeads with
- Court upholding the Kansas ban
- Protecting voters from confusion
- Restriction on third-party prefilling
See the 3 headlines from the rightHide the headlines
- The Epoch TimesFar Right
Court Upholds Kansas Ban on Prefilled Ballot Applications
The law was passed to prevent voter confusion.
- The FederalistFar Right
Court: Kansas Can Stop Third Parties From Sending Voters Pre-Filled Mail-In Ballot Forms
In a Partisan shorthand“win for election integrity”Calling the ruling a win for election integrity adopts one side's name for the law instead of describing what the court decided.More neutral: a ruling in favor of the state lawDisagree with this highlight?, a federal appellate court upheld on Wednesday a Kansas law prohibiting third-party groups from sending voters pre-filled absentee ballot applications. …
- ReasonRight
Kansas Ban on Private Parties' Partially Prefilling Voters' Mail Ballot Applications Upheld
A short excerpt from today's longish Tenth Circuit opinion in VoteAmerica v. Schwab, by Judge Timothy Tymkovich, joined by Judges…
Articles you open from here build My Mix, a private picture of how your reading spreads across the spectrum, kept on this device. What is My Mix?
The left is Far Left and Left together. The right is Right and Far Right together. Every outlet keeps its own five-point rating.
Who reported it when
How the coverage built up
Left
No report yet
From the outlets Mantle follows
Center
No report yet
From the outlets Mantle follows
Right
First to report
Reason, Oct 14, 5:56 PM EDT
See the order the outlets reported inHide the order
- ReasonRightOct 14, 5:56 PM EDT
- The FederalistFar RightOct 15, 3:59 PM EDT
- The Epoch TimesFar RightOct 16, 8:19 AM EDT
Times are the ones the outlets published in their own feeds, in Eastern time. Opinion is left out.
Read next
More on Government & Policy
PoliticsDeveloping
Musk backs Paxton in Texas Senate race as Talarico criticizes his spending
3 outlets
More on Government & Policy
PoliticsBreaking
Democrats sue Trump and Justice Department over federal push on state voter rolls
7 outlets
Next in today’s stories
WorldDeveloping
Witkoff meets Putin in St. Petersburg; Kremlin says it is ready for three-way talks
17 outlets
Next in today’s stories
WorldBreaking
Russia frees US citizen Stephen Hubbard during US envoy Witkoff’s visit
33 outlets
A story one side mostly skipped
PoliticsBreaking
Polling firm Wedgewood admits its midterm polls were fabricated
14 outletsQuiet on the left