Skip to content

Government & PolicyDeveloping

Appeals court weighs whether presidential records belong to Trump or the public

By

Coverage spectrum

Covered by 3 outlets, mostly left-leaning (67%).

3 articles in total. The spectrum counts each outlet once and leaves opinion out. How we measure bias

Three outlets report that a three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit heard the Justice Department’s arguments on the Presidential Records Act, a federal law requiring presidents to preserve their papers and hand them over. The administration says presidential papers created in the White House belong to Donald Trump, not the American people, according to NPR. Trump’s legal team argues the 1978 law is unconstitutional, the Washington Examiner reports, while The New York Times reports that the panel appeared unconvinced by that claim. The Examiner reports the panel appeared likely to dismiss Trump’s argument. NPR says the case could ultimately reach the Supreme Court.

Headline and summary written by Mantle’s AI from the coverage below, under published rules. How this works

What happened

Key points

Each point shows who reports it, from Far Left to Far Right.

  1. A three-judge federal appeals court panel is considering whether a federal law requiring presidents to preserve and hand over their papers is constitutional.

    Reported byLeft2Right1See the outletsHide the outlets
    Left
    NPR, The New York Times
    Right
    Washington Examiner

  2. The administration and the Justice Department say presidential papers created in the White House belong to Donald Trump, not the American people.

    One side only: the leftReported byLeft2See the outletsHide the outlets
    Left
    NPR, The New York Times

  3. Trump’s legal team argues that the 1978 Presidential Records Act is unconstitutional.

    One outletWashington Examiner· Right

  4. Judges on the panel appeared skeptical of the argument that the law is unconstitutional, according to reports.

    Reported byLeft1Right1See the outletsHide the outlets
    Left
    The New York Times
    Right
    Washington Examiner

  5. The case could ultimately reach the Supreme Court, NPR reports.

    One outletNPR· Left

What is contested

Where accounts differ

Points the coverage does not agree on, and who says what.

  • Presidential papers created in the White House belong to Donald Trump rather than the public.

    The administration and Trump’s legal team say the papers belong to Trump and that the law requiring their retention is unconstitutional. The New York Times and the Washington Examiner report the panel appeared unconvinced or likely to dismiss that argument.

How each side tells it

Compare views

Every outlet reports that a three-judge appeals court panel heard arguments over whether presidential records belong to Trump or the public under a federal records law. The left stresses the panel’s doubts about the Justice Department’s claim, while the right stresses the court pressing against Trump’s argument that the law is unconstitutional.

  • the left

    2 outlets

    Left-side headlines center on who owns presidential records and report the appeals court’s doubts about the Justice Department’s claim, with NPR asking the question directly.

    Appeals Court Questions Justice Dept. Claim that Trump Owns White House Records
    The New York TimesLeftAll left-leaning headlines

  • the center

    No coverage yet

    No center outlet that Mantle follows has covered this story yet. That absence is part of the picture.

  • the right

    1 outlet

    The right-rated Washington Examiner headline says the appeals court presses hard against Trump’s argument for private ownership of presidential records.

    Appeals court Loaded verb“presses hard against”The verb adds drama beyond the reported fact that the panel questioned the argument during a hearing.More neutral: questionsDisagree with this highlight? Trump’s argument for private ownership of presidential records
    Washington ExaminerRightAll right-leaning headlines

The words they chose

Language to notice

Words that carry a judgement beyond the facts. Tap a highlighted word anywhere on the page to see why.

  • Left0

    No loaded words in its own voice.

  • Center

    Has not covered this story.

  • Right1

    presses hard against

In the outlets’ own words

  • Loaded verb

    presses hard againstMore neutral: questions

    The verb adds drama beyond the reported fact that the panel questioned the argument during a hearing.

    Appeals court presses hard against Trump’s argument for private ownership of presidential records

    Used byWashington Examiner (Right)

See the full language guide

See for yourself

Side by side

What each side leads with and what it leaves out. Open a side to read its headlines.

From the left

2 outlets

Leads with

  • public ownership of presidential papers
  • appeals court doubts about the government’s claim
  • possible route to the Supreme Court

Leaves out

  • the Mar-a-Lago classified documents accusation behind the challenge

Reported by other sides, not found in this side’s coverage.

See the 2 headlines from the leftHide the headlines
  • The New York TimesLeft

    Appeals Court Questions Justice Dept. Claim that Trump Owns White House Records

    A three-judge panel appeared unconvinced by claims that a federal law requiring the president to preserve and hand over his presidential papers was unconstitutional.

    Read at The New York Times (opens in a new tab)
  • NPRLeft

    Do Americans own the president's papers? Appeals court to weigh in

    The administration says papers created in the White House belong to Donald Trump, not to the American people. The case could ultimately end up at the conservative-leaning Supreme Court.

    Read at NPR (opens in a new tab)

From the center

0 outlets

No center outlet that Mantle follows has covered this story yet. That absence is part of the picture.

From the right

1 outlet

Leads with

  • court pushback on Trump’s argument
  • Trump’s claim that the law is illegal
  • classified documents stored at Mar-a-Lago

Leaves out

  • the possible route of the case to the Supreme Court

Reported by other sides, not found in this side’s coverage.

See the headline from the rightHide the headlines
  • Washington ExaminerRight

    Appeals court Loaded verb“presses hard against”The verb adds drama beyond the reported fact that the panel questioned the argument during a hearing.More neutral: questionsDisagree with this highlight? Trump’s argument for private ownership of presidential records

    A federal appeals court appears likely to dismiss President Donald Trump’s argument that a law ensuring presidential papers are retained by the government is unconstitutional. …

    Read at Washington Examiner (opens in a new tab)

Articles you open from here build My Mix, a private picture of how your reading spreads across the spectrum, kept on this device. What is My Mix?

The left is Far Left and Left together. The right is Right and Far Right together. Every outlet keeps its own five-point rating.

Who reported it when

How the coverage built up

  • Left

    First to report

    NPR, Oct 16, 5:00 AM EDT

  • Center

    No report yet

    From the outlets Mantle follows

  • Right

    1 day 7 hr later

    Its first report, Oct 17, 12:04 PM EDT

See the order the outlets reported inHide the order
  1. NPRLeftOct 16, 5:00 AM EDT
  2. The New York TimesLeftOct 16, 5:25 PM EDT
  3. Washington ExaminerRightOct 17, 12:04 PM EDT

Times are the ones the outlets published in their own feeds, in Eastern time. Opinion is left out.

Read next

Help someone else find the truth beneath the surface

Most people see one side of a story. Share this one, so they can see how every side is telling it and decide for themselves.

Email it

Seen a mistake? Tell us what is wrong with this page