Skip to content

Government & PolicyDeveloping

Arlington County, Virginia, sues over Trump’s proposed triumphal arch

By

Coverage spectrum

Covered by 10 outlets across the spectrum.

11 articles in total. The spectrum counts each outlet once and leaves opinion out. How we measure bias

White mock-up triumphal arch framing the U.S. Capitol dome, with people on the lawn
Image via The New York TimesHow images are chosenReport this image

Arlington County, Virginia, filed a lawsuit on Thursday in federal court to block President Donald Trump’s proposed 250-foot triumphal arch near Arlington National Cemetery. The county says the National Park Service relied on an environmental assessment instead of a full environmental impact statement and rushed the review. The county also argues the arch would worsen traffic, safety, noise and air pollution, and would block the view between the Lincoln Memorial and the cemetery. Trump said in September that the arch would also serve as a military facility. The U.S. Commission of Fine Arts has approved the design. According to the Washington Examiner, the National Capital Planning Commission is scheduled to hold a final vote on Nov. 5.

Headline and summary written by Mantle’s AI from the coverage below, under published rules. How this works

What happened

Key points

Each point shows who reports it, from Far Left to Far Right.

  1. Arlington County, Virginia, filed a lawsuit on Thursday to block the proposed triumphal arch.

    Reported byFar Left1Left4Center1Right2Far Right1See the outletsHide the outlets
    Far Left
    The Daily Beast
    Left
    The New York Times, ABC News, The Independent, Al Jazeera English
    Center
    The Hill
    Right
    The Washington Times, Washington Examiner
    Far Right
    The Epoch Times

  2. The county’s lawsuit argues the National Park Service used an environmental assessment instead of a full environmental impact statement, rushing the review.

    Reported byFar Left1Left2Right1See the outletsHide the outlets
    Far Left
    The Daily Beast
    Left
    The Independent, Al Jazeera English
    Right
    Washington Examiner

  3. The proposed arch would be about 250 feet tall and modeled on the Arc de Triomphe, planned near Arlington National Cemetery.

    Reported byLeft2Center1Far Right1See the outletsHide the outlets
    Left
    The Independent, Al Jazeera English
    Center
    The Hill
    Far Right
    The Epoch Times

  4. The U.S. Commission of Fine Arts has approved the arch’s design.

    Reported byLeft1Center1Far Right1See the outletsHide the outlets
    Left
    The Independent
    Center
    The Hill
    Far Right
    The Epoch Times

  5. Trump said in September that the arch would also serve as a military facility capable of storing and deploying drones.

    One outletThe Epoch Times· Far Right

Show 2 more pointsShow fewer points

  1. The county says the arch would block the line of sight between the Lincoln Memorial and Arlington National Cemetery.

    Reported byLeft1Far Right1See the outletsHide the outlets
    Left
    The Independent
    Far Right
    The Epoch Times

  2. According to the Washington Examiner, the National Capital Planning Commission is scheduled to give the arch a final vote on Nov. 5.

    One outletWashington Examiner· Right

What is contested

Where accounts differ

Points the coverage does not agree on, and who says what.

  • When the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts approved the arch’s design

    The Hill and the Epoch Times say April, while the Independent says May.

  • Whether the arch would serve as a military facility

    Trump said in September that the arch would also serve as a military facility able to store and deploy drones and position snipers. The county says storing ammunition and drones there would create public-safety risks.

  • Whether the federal review of the arch was adequate

    The county argues the Park Service rushed the process and skipped a full environmental impact statement. The supplied coverage does not include a response from the Park Service or the administration.

How each side tells it

Compare views

  • the left

    5 outlets

    Mainstream left outlets use neutral lawsuit headlines such as sues and faces new lawsuit, while the Independent’s headline calls the arch Trump’s beloved and the Daily Beast’s calls it tacky, the most pointed framing on the left.

    Trump’s planned DC arch faces new lawsuit
    Al Jazeera EnglishLeftAll left-leaning headlines

  • the center

    2 outlets

    The Hill’s headline pairs the county’s lawsuit with the project’s key approval, framing the suit as a response to a step forward for the arch.

    Arlington County sues to block Trump arch after project gets key approval
    The HillCenterAll center headlines

  • the right

    3 outlets

    Right-side headlines use neutral wording such as faces new lawsuit and sues to block, and the Washington Times headline is an Associated Press report also carried by left outlets, so the right’s own framing comes mainly from the Washington Examiner and the Epoch Times.

    Trump’s Triumphal Arch faces new lawsuit from Arlington County
    Washington ExaminerRightAll right-leaning headlines

The words they chose

Language to notice

Words that carry a judgement beyond the facts. Tap a highlighted word anywhere on the page to see why.

  • Left6

    tacky D.C. makeoverramming throughso-calledeyesore

  • Center0

    No loaded words in its own voice.

  • Right0

    No loaded words in its own voice.

In the outlets’ own words

  • Loaded modifier

    tacky D.C. makeoverMore neutral: D.C. project

    Describing the project as tacky is an aesthetic judgement presented as fact.

    Donald Trump’s tacky D.C. makeover has taken a hit as local leaders filed a targeted lawsuit in federal court to…

    Used byThe Daily Beast (Far Left)

  • Loaded verb

    ramming throughMore neutral: moving quickly to advance

    The verb implies the project is being forced past opposition, which is the lawsuit’s claim rather than an established fact.

    …leaders filed a targeted lawsuit in federal court to stop the president from ramming through a massive project without proper legal review.

    Used byThe Daily Beast (Far Left)

  • Delegitimizing label

    so-calledMore neutral: nicknamed

    The qualifier casts the nickname as illegitimate without evidence and was not needed to report the event.

    …agencies of ignoring environmental and safety standards in the rush to build the so-called “Arc de Trump.

    Used byThe Daily Beast (Far Left)

  • Loaded modifier

    eyesoreMore neutral: 250-foot structure

    Calling the arch an eyesore is an aesthetic judgement, not a description of the lawsuit.

    Local officials are taking bold action to block the president’s 250-foot eyesore.

    Used byThe Daily Beast (Far Left)

Show 2 more phrasesShow fewer

  • Loaded modifier

    Tacky ArchMore neutral: Arch

    Calling the project tacky is a judgement of its appearance that the facts of the lawsuit do not establish.

    Trump Faces New Battle Over His Tacky Arch

    Used byThe Daily Beast (Far Left)

  • Loaded modifier

    belovedMore neutral: his proposed

    Calling the arch Trump’s beloved project adds a judgement of affection that the facts do not establish.

    Virginia county sues to stop Trump from building his beloved triumphal arch

    Used byThe Independent (Left)

See the full language guide

See for yourself

Side by side

What each side leads with and what it leaves out. Open a side to read its headlines.

From the left

5 outlets

Leads with

  • the county’s environmental and safety objections
  • the arch being Trump’s own project
  • the all-Trump-appointed approving commissioners

Leaves out

  • Trump’s September comments describing a military use for the arch

Reported by other sides, not found in this side’s coverage.

See the 5 headlines from the leftHide the headlines
  • Al Jazeera EnglishLeft

    Trump’s planned DC arch faces new lawsuit

    A Virginia county governing board filed the suit, claiming that planning for the monument near DC was rushed.

    Read at Al Jazeera English (opens in a new tab)
  • The IndependentLeft

    Virginia county sues to stop Trump from building his Loaded modifier“beloved”Calling the arch Trump’s beloved project adds a judgement of affection that the facts do not establish.More neutral: his proposedDisagree with this highlight? triumphal arch

    The lawsuit marks the first time a government entity has challenged the proposed arch in court

    Read at The Independent (opens in a new tab)
  • The Daily BeastFar Left

    Trump Faces New Battle Over His Loaded modifier“Tacky Arch”Calling the project tacky is a judgement of its appearance that the facts of the lawsuit do not establish.More neutral: ArchDisagree with this highlight?

    Donald Trump’s Loaded modifier“tacky D.C. makeover”Describing the project as tacky is an aesthetic judgement presented as fact.More neutral: D.C. projectDisagree with this highlight? has taken a hit as local leaders filed a targeted lawsuit in federal court to stop the president from Loaded verb“ramming through”The verb implies the project is being forced past opposition, which is the lawsuit’s claim rather than an established fact.More neutral: moving quickly to advanceDisagree with this highlight? a massive project without proper legal review. …

    Read at The Daily Beast (opens in a new tab)
  • ABC NewsLeftAssociated Press report

    Trump's memorial arch faces new lawsuit from Arlington County, Virginia

    The Arlington County Board in Virginia has filed a lawsuit opposing the construction of the Triumphal Arch, becoming the first governmental body to take legal action against President Donald Trump’s planned monument

    Read at ABC News (opens in a new tab)

    Also published by PBS NewsHour and The Washington Times. It counts once.

  • The New York TimesLeft

    Arlington County Sues to Block Trump’s Triumphal Arch

    The county is home to Arlington National Cemetery, the military gravesite that is central to the legal battle over the planned arch.

    Read at The New York Times (opens in a new tab)

From the center

2 outlets

Leads with

  • the Commission of Fine Arts approval
  • concerns about tourism and safety for local residents
  • the 250-foot scale of the arch

Leaves out

  • the county’s claims about the environmental review process

Reported by other sides, not found in this side’s coverage.

See the 2 headlines from the centerHide the headlines
  • The HillCenter

    Arlington County sues to block Trump arch after project gets key approval

    Arlington County has filed a lawsuit to block President Trump’s proposed triumphal arch following the project's approval by the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts in April. …

    Read at The Hill (opens in a new tab)
  • PBS NewsHourCenterAssociated Press report

    Trump's memorial arch faces a new lawsuit from Arlington County, Virginia

    PBS NewsHour published a report that is shown in full at ABC News. The headline is the one PBS NewsHour gave it.

    Read at PBS NewsHour (opens in a new tab)

From the right

3 outlets

Leads with

  • the county’s safety, noise and air pollution concerns
  • Trump’s description of the arch as a military facility
  • the upcoming National Capital Planning Commission vote

Leaves out

  • the Trump-appointed composition of the approving commission

Reported by other sides, not found in this side’s coverage.

See the 4 headlines from the rightHide the headlines

Articles you open from here build My Mix, a private picture of how your reading spreads across the spectrum, kept on this device. What is My Mix?

The left is Far Left and Left together. The right is Right and Far Right together. Every outlet keeps its own five-point rating.

Who reported it when

How the coverage built up

  • Left

    24 min later

    Its first report, Oct 8, 10:31 PM EDT

  • Center

    40 min later

    Its first report, Oct 8, 10:46 PM EDT

  • Right

    First to report

    The Washington Times, Oct 8, 10:06 PM EDT

See the order the outlets reported inHide the order
  1. The Washington TimesRightOct 8, 10:06 PM EDT
  2. The New York TimesLeftOct 8, 10:31 PM EDT
  3. The HillCenterOct 8, 10:46 PM EDT
  4. ABC NewsLeftOct 9, 2:44 AM EDT
  5. The Daily BeastFar LeftOct 9, 8:16 AM EDT
  6. The IndependentLeftOct 9, 9:35 AM EDT
  7. The Epoch TimesFar RightOct 9, 10:26 AM EDT
  8. Al Jazeera EnglishLeftOct 9, 11:04 AM EDT
  9. Washington ExaminerRightOct 9, 11:06 AM EDT
  10. PBS NewsHourCenterOct 9, 12:12 PM EDT

Times are the ones the outlets published in their own feeds, in Eastern time. Opinion is left out.

Read next

Help someone else find the truth beneath the surface

Most people see one side of a story. Share this one, so they can see how every side is telling it and decide for themselves.

Email it

Seen a mistake? Tell us what is wrong with this page