PoliticsFeature
Biden says his June 2024 debate with Trump was ‘not very consequential’
By Mantle News
Coverage spectrum
Covered by 5 outlets across the spectrum.
8 articles in total, 3 of them opinion. The spectrum counts each outlet once and leaves opinion out. How we measure bias
Former President Joe Biden told People magazine, in an interview ahead of his memoir “Promise Me, America,” that his June 2024 debate against Donald Trump was “not very consequential.” Biden said, “Look, I don’t know anybody who hasn’t made a mistake in a debate.” The New York Times reports that Biden repeatedly lost his train of thought during the debate, which led to widespread Democratic pressure to end his campaign. Biden ended his reelection bid weeks later. Biden’s remarks have been reported by outlets on the left, center and right.
Headline and summary written by Mantle’s AI from the coverage below, under published rules. Editors read every story. How this works
What happened
Key points
Each point shows who reports it, from Far Left to Far Right.
Biden told People magazine that his June 2024 debate with Trump was “not very consequential.”
Reported byLeft1Center2Right1Far Right3See the outletsHide the outlets
- Left
- The New York Times
- Center
- The Hill, NewsNation
- Right
- Washington Examiner
- Far Right
- Hot Air, Townhall, Fox News
Biden said, “Look, I don’t know anybody who hasn’t made a mistake in a debate.”
Reported byCenter1Right1See the outletsHide the outlets
- Center
- The Hill
- Right
- Washington Examiner
Biden ended his 2024 reelection campaign weeks after the debate.
Reported byLeft1Far Right3See the outletsHide the outlets
- Left
- The New York Times
- Far Right
- Hot Air, Townhall, Fox News
The New York Times reports that Biden repeatedly lost his train of thought during the debate.
One outletThe New York Times· Left
Biden’s memoir “Promise Me, America” is due out November 17.
One outletRedState· Far Right
What is contested
Where accounts differ
Questions the coverage answers differently, and who says what.
Was Biden’s June 2024 debate performance consequential for his campaign?
Biden told People it was “not very consequential.” The New York Times describes the performance as disastrous and says it led to widespread Democratic pressure to end his campaign.
How each side tells it
Compare views
Every side reports that Biden told People magazine his June 2024 debate with Trump was “not very consequential.” Left coverage stresses the debate’s role in his exit, centre coverage keeps to his remark, and right coverage leans on mockery and doubts about his fitness.
the left
1 outlet
The New York Times leads with Biden’s own words and calls the debate “disastrous” in its headline, linking it to Democratic pressure that ended his campaign.
Biden Calls His Disastrous 2024 Debate Performance ‘Not Very Consequential’
The New York TimesLeftAll left-leaning headlines the center
2 outlets
The Hill and NewsNation report Biden’s remark plainly as a quote about his debate performance, with The Hill adding concerns about his age and ability to serve.
Biden says his debate performance was ‘not very consequential’
The HillCenterAll center headlines the right
2 outlets · 3 opinion
Washington Examiner reports the remark plainly, while Far Right outlets Hot Air, Townhall and RedState mock Biden’s memory and fitness and frame the claim as deceptive.
Biden calls 2024 debate performance ‘not very consequential’
Washington ExaminerRightAll right-leaning headlines
The words they chose
Language to notice
Words that carry a judgement beyond the facts. Tap a highlighted word anywhere on the page to see why.
Left0
No loaded words in its own voice.
Center0
No loaded words in its own voice.
Right9
disastroussharp backlashripped forcouldn’t care less
In the outlets’ own words
Sensational language
disastrousMore neutral: debate performance
“Disastrous” is an evaluative adjective describing the debate performance in the outlet’s own voice.
Joe Biden tells People Magazine his disastrous June 2024 presidential debate against Trump was "not very consequential," drawing…
Used byFox News (Far Right)
Sensational language
sharp backlashMore neutral: criticism
“Sharp backlash” characterizes the reaction in dramatic terms without specifying who criticized the remarks.
Former President Joe Biden is facing sharp backlash after dismissing his disastrous 2024 debate performance against President Donald…
Used byFox News (Far Right)
Loaded verb
ripped forMore neutral: criticized over
“Ripped for” signals harsh condemnation in the outlet’s own voice rather than reporting the criticism neutrally.
Biden ripped for ‘totally delusional’ claim about debate that preceded his 2024 exit
Used byFox News (Far Right)
Loaded modifier
couldn’t care lessMore neutral: Biden downplays the debate
Characterizes Biden’s attitude to the debate as indifferent, a judgement the reported quote does not establish.
Meanwhile, Joe Biden couldn’t care less.
Used byTownhall (Far Right)
Show 5 more phrasesShow fewer
Loaded verb
GaslightingMore neutral: Biden’s account conflicts with the record
Asserts that Biden is deliberately deceiving the public, a claim about intent the article does not support.
Gaslighting America to the bitter end, eh?
Used byHot Air (Far Right)
Loaded modifier
consistently bad at itMore neutral: Biden’s remarks are inconsistent with the record
Passes a judgement on Biden’s ability to deceive rather than describing his remarks.
And just as consistently bad at it, too.
Used byHot Air (Far Right)
Loaded modifier
InfamousMore neutral: June 2024 debate
Pre-judges the June 2024 debate as notorious before describing what happened in it.
Biden Revisits Infamous Debate With Delusional New Take – But Then Came a Surprising Admission
Used byRedState (Far Right)
Loaded modifier
DelusionalMore neutral: Biden’s new take
Calls Biden’s new take delusional, a judgement about his state of mind that the excerpt does not establish.
Biden Revisits Infamous Debate With Delusional New Take – But Then Came a Surprising Admission
Used byRedState (Far Right)
Sensational language
Surprising AdmissionMore neutral: Biden’s comments
Presents the remark as a dramatic confession, which the quoted text does not show.
Biden Revisits Infamous Debate With Delusional New Take – But Then Came a Surprising Admission
Used byRedState (Far Right)
Words quoted from someone else (2)Hide the quoted words
Loaded words that outlets reported someone else saying. They show what was said, not how the outlet chose to say it.
Sensational language
Quotedtotally delusionalMore neutral: claim about the debate
“Totally delusional” is an insult in the headline, applied to a claim that the outlet presents without evidence of delusion.
Biden ripped for ‘totally delusional’ claim about debate that preceded his 2024 exit
Quoted byFox News (Far Right)
Inside a quotation: the outlets are reporting someone else’s words.
Sensational language
Quotedmust have been druggedMore neutral: Jill Biden has speculated about the cause of his debate performance
Repeats a speculative explanation for the debate performance that the excerpt does not support with evidence.
Jill believes her husband’s 2024 debate was so catastrophic that he must have been drugged.
Quoted byTownhall (Far Right)
These are Jill Biden’s words. The outlets are reporting them.
See for yourself
Side by side
What each side leads with and what it leaves out. Open a side to read its headlines.
From the left
1 outletLeads with
- Biden’s own characterization of the debate
- Debate performance as disastrous
- Democratic pressure to end his campaign
Leaves out
- Biden’s claim he expected a second debate that never happened
Reported by other sides, not found in this side’s coverage.
See the headline from the leftHide the headlines
Biden Calls His Disastrous 2024 Debate Performance ‘Not Very Consequential’
A debate against Donald Trump in which Mr. Biden, then the president, repeatedly lost his train of thought led to widespread Democratic pressure to end his campaign, which Mr. Biden eventually did.
From the center
2 outletsLeads with
- Biden’s own words
- Concerns about age and ability to serve
- Effect of the debate on his reelection
See the 2 headlines from the centerHide the headlines
- The HillCenter
Biden says his debate performance was ‘not very consequential’
Former President Joe Biden reflected in a new interview on his 2024 debate performance against President Trump, which sparked concerns at the time about his age and ability to serve another term in the Oval Office. …
- NewsNationCenter
Biden says 2024 debate with Trump was ‘not very consequential’
(NewsNation) — Former President Joe Biden is downplaying the significance of his 2024 debate performance against President Donald Trump, calling the moment “not very consequential” as he reflected on his final presidential campaign. …
From the right
2 outlets · 3 opinionLeads with
- Biden’s dismissal of the debate
- Questions about his memory and mental fitness
- Contrast with his withdrawal from the race
See the 5 headlines from the rightHide the headlines
- Washington ExaminerRight
Biden calls 2024 debate performance ‘not very consequential’
Former President Joe Biden is downplaying the significance of his 2024 debate performance against President Donald Trump, saying did not view the widely criticized appearance as a turning point in his reelection campaign. …
- Fox NewsFar Right
Biden Loaded verb“ripped for”“Ripped for” signals harsh condemnation in the outlet’s own voice rather than reporting the criticism neutrally.More neutral: criticized overDisagree with this highlight? ‘Sensational language“totally delusional”“Totally delusional” is an insult in the headline, applied to a claim that the outlet presents without evidence of delusion.More neutral: claim about the debateThis appears inside a quotation. The outlet is reporting someone else’s words.Disagree with this highlight?’ claim about debate that preceded his 2024 exit
Joe Biden tells People Magazine his Sensational language“disastrous”“Disastrous” is an evaluative adjective describing the debate performance in the outlet’s own voice.More neutral: debate performanceDisagree with this highlight? June 2024 presidential debate against Trump was "not very consequential," drawing sharp criticism.
Biden Revisits Loaded modifier“Infamous”Pre-judges the June 2024 debate as notorious before describing what happened in it.More neutral: June 2024 debateDisagree with this highlight? Debate With Loaded modifier“Delusional”Calls Biden’s new take delusional, a judgement about his state of mind that the excerpt does not establish.More neutral: Biden’s new takeDisagree with this highlight? New Take – But Then Came a Sensational language“Surprising Admission”Presents the remark as a dramatic confession, which the quoted text does not show.More neutral: Biden’s commentsDisagree with this highlight?
Joe Biden has certainly been in the news recently.
Biden: Debate? What Debate?
Loaded verb“Gaslighting”Asserts that Biden is deliberately deceiving the public, a claim about intent the article does not support.More neutral: Biden’s account conflicts with the recordDisagree with this highlight? America to the bitter end, eh? At least Joe Biden is consistent. And just as Loaded modifier“consistently bad at it”Passes a judgement on Biden’s ability to deceive rather than describing his remarks.More neutral: Biden’s remarks are inconsistent with the recordDisagree with this highlight?, too.
Joe Biden: I Didn't Think My Disastrous Debate With Trump Wasn't Consequential
It’s a tale of two Bidens. Jill believes her husband’s 2024 debate was so catastrophic that he Sensational language“must have been drugged”Repeats a speculative explanation for the debate performance that the excerpt does not support with evidence.More neutral: Jill Biden has speculated about the cause of his debate performanceThese are Jill Biden’s words. The outlet is reporting them.Disagree with this highlight?. Whether she did it accidentally remains a mystery — Joe had a cold and might have taken a sleeping agent instead of cold medicine, or his drink might have been …
The stories you read build My Mix, a private picture of which sides cover the stories you choose, kept on this device. What is My Mix?
The left is Far Left and Left together. The right is Right and Far Right together. Every outlet keeps its own five-point rating.
Who reported it when
How the coverage built up
Left
6 hr 19 min later
Its first report, Nov 11, 3:14 PM EST
Center
First to report
NewsNation, Nov 11, 8:55 AM EST
Right
4 hr 49 min later
Its first report, Nov 11, 1:44 PM EST
See the order the outlets reported inHide the order
- NewsNationCenterNov 11, 8:55 AM EST
- The HillCenterNov 11, 12:25 PM EST
- Fox NewsFar RightNov 11, 1:44 PM EST
- Washington ExaminerRightNov 11, 1:45 PM EST
- The New York TimesLeftNov 11, 3:14 PM EST
Times are the ones the outlets published in their own feeds, in Eastern time. Opinion is left out.
Read next
More on Politics
Government & PolicyDeveloping
White House warns Democrats planned probes of Trump administration could be criminal
35 outlets
6 outlets
Next in today’s stories
PoliticsDeveloping
More than a dozen US congressional races remain uncalled a week after the midterms
6 outlets
Next in today’s stories
PoliticsDeveloping
Trump visits Arlington Cemetery on Veterans Day amid legal fight over arch
6 outlets
A story one side mostly skipped
Crime & JusticeBreaking
Florida attorney general subpoenas Democratic Socialists of America
11 outletsQuiet in the center