Skip to content

Politics

Crenshaw and Raskin clash on CNN over Senate votes on two House-passed bills

By

Coverage spectrum

Covered by 3 outlets, mostly right-leaning (67%).

3 articles in total. The spectrum counts each outlet once and leaves opinion out. How we measure bias

Two men in dark suits seated outdoors in conversation, with a government building behind them.
Image via Breitbart NewsHow images are chosenReport this image

In a heated exchange on CNN’s “Election Day in America” on Wednesday, Republican Rep. Dan Crenshaw and Democratic Rep. Jamie Raskin argued over Senate votes on two House-passed bills, one restricting lawmakers’ stock purchases and one on data center power costs. RedState reports that Senate Democrats blocked both from advancing. Crenshaw said Democrats did so to deny Republicans a win before Election Day. Raskin responded that both motions needed 60 votes. Raw Story describes the segment as a shouting match in which the two lawmakers traded personal insults. The clash came the day after the midterm elections.

Headline and summary written by Mantle’s AI from the coverage below, under published rules. Editors read every story. How this works

What happened

Key points

Each point shows who reports it, from Far Left to Far Right.

  1. Crenshaw and Raskin clashed on CNN’s “Election Day in America” on Wednesday, the day after the midterm elections.

    Reported byFar Left1Far Right2See the outletsHide the outlets
    Far Left
    Raw Story
    Far Right
    RedState, Breitbart News
  2. Crenshaw raised two bills that passed the House, one restricting congressional stock purchases and one on keeping data center power costs off household bills.

    One outletRedState· Far Right

  3. Senate votes on both bills failed to advance, with four Democrats crossing over on the data center bill, according to one account.

    One outletRedState· Far Right

  4. Crenshaw said Democrats blocked the bills to deny Republicans a win before Election Day.

    Reported byFar Left1Far Right1See the outletsHide the outlets
    Far Left
    Raw Story
    Far Right
    RedState
  5. Raskin said that both motions needed 60 votes to advance in the Senate.

    One outletRedState· Far Right

What is contested

Where accounts differ

Questions the coverage answers differently, and who says what.

  • Did Senate Democrats block the two bills to deny Republicans a win before Election Day?

    Crenshaw said they did for that reason. Raskin answered that both motions needed 60 votes, according to RedState.

How each side tells it

Compare views

Every side present reports that Crenshaw and Raskin clashed on CNN on Wednesday over Crenshaw’s claim that Democrats blocked bipartisan bills before the midterms. The right-leaning outlets focus on the bills and the Senate vote count, while the left-leaning Raw Story focuses on the shouting and the dispute over Trump’s agenda.

  • the left

    1 outlet

    Raw Story’s headline centers on a shouting match and lawmakers at each other’s throats rather than on the bills at issue; only one left-side newsroom is present.

    ‘Stop lying!’ Shouting match Loaded verb“explodes”The verb makes the exchange sound more dramatic than the reported heated exchange.More neutral: breaks outDisagree with this highlight? on CNN as lawmakers are at each other's throats
    Raw StoryFar LeftAll left-leaning headlines
  • the center

    No coverage yet

    No center outlet that Mantle follows has covered this story yet. That absence is part of the picture.

  • the right

    2 outlets

    RedState’s headline calls Raskin’s response a fumble and the Democratic move a pre-election ploy, while Breitbart’s neutral headline calls the exchange a heated clash.

    Jamie Raskin Left Loaded verb“Fumbling”The headline judges Raskin’s response as a failure rather than reporting what he said.More neutral: respondsDisagree with this highlight? After Dan Crenshaw Loaded verb“Exposes”The verb presents Crenshaw’s argument as proven rather than as his claim.More neutral: arguesDisagree with this highlight? a Dem Party Partisan shorthand“Pre-Election Ploy”The label names Crenshaw’s motive as settled fact in the outlet’s own voice.More neutral: move made before the electionDisagree with this highlight?
    RedStateFar RightAll right-leaning headlines

The words they chose

Language to notice

Words that carry a judgement beyond the facts. Tap a highlighted word anywhere on the page to see why.

  • Left3

    furiousexplosive exchangeexplodes

  • Center

    Has not covered this story.

  • Right3

    FumblingExposesPre-Election Ploy

In the outlets’ own words

  • Sensational language

    furiousMore neutral: loud

    The adjective adds emotional intensity in the outlet’s own voice.

    Jamie Raskin (D-MD) and Dan Crenshaw (R-TX) erupted into a furious shouting match on CNN Wednesday, pointing fingers and trading personal insults as…

    Used byRaw Story (Far Left)

  • Sensational language

    explosive exchangeMore neutral: exchange

    The phrase adds drama beyond the reported content of the exchange.

    The explosive exchange unfolded a day after Republicans suffered bruising midterm election losses, with…

    Used byRaw Story (Far Left)

  • Loaded verb

    explodesMore neutral: breaks out

    The verb makes the exchange sound more dramatic than the reported heated exchange.

    ‘Stop lying!’ Shouting match explodes on CNN as lawmakers are at each other's throats

    Used byRaw Story (Far Left)

  • Loaded verb

    FumblingMore neutral: responds

    The headline judges Raskin’s response as a failure rather than reporting what he said.

    Jamie Raskin Left Fumbling After Dan Crenshaw Exposes a Dem Party Pre-Election Ploy

    Used byRedState (Far Right)

Show 2 more phrasesShow fewer
  • Loaded verb

    ExposesMore neutral: argues

    The verb presents Crenshaw’s argument as proven rather than as his claim.

    Jamie Raskin Left Fumbling After Dan Crenshaw Exposes a Dem Party Pre-Election Ploy

    Used byRedState (Far Right)

  • Partisan shorthand

    Pre-Election PloyMore neutral: move made before the election

    The label names Crenshaw’s motive as settled fact in the outlet’s own voice.

    Jamie Raskin Left Fumbling After Dan Crenshaw Exposes a Dem Party Pre-Election Ploy

    Used byRedState (Far Right)

See the full language guide

See for yourself

Side by side

What each side leads with and what it leaves out. Open a side to read its headlines.

From the left

1 outlet

Leads with

  • Shouting and personal insults
  • Crenshaw’s accusation of blocked bipartisan legislation
  • Trump’s war in Iran, tariffs and gridlock as backdrop

Leaves out

  • Names of the two bills and the 60-vote Senate requirement

Reported by other sides, not found in this side’s coverage.

See the headline from the leftHide the headlines
  • Raw StoryFar Left

    ‘Stop lying!’ Shouting match Loaded verb“explodes”The verb makes the exchange sound more dramatic than the reported heated exchange.More neutral: breaks outDisagree with this highlight? on CNN as lawmakers are at each other's throats

    Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) and Dan Crenshaw (R-TX) erupted into a Sensational language“furious”The adjective adds emotional intensity in the outlet’s own voice.More neutral: loudDisagree with this highlight? shouting match on CNN Wednesday, pointing fingers and trading personal insults as their discussion of President Donald Trump’s agenda spiraled into an on-air confrontation. …

From the center

0 outlets

No center outlet that Mantle follows has covered this story yet. That absence is part of the picture.

From the right

2 outlets

Leads with

  • Democrats blocking House-passed bills
  • Crenshaw’s claim of a pre-election ploy
  • Raskin’s answer on the Senate 60-vote rule
See the 2 headlines from the rightHide the headlines
  • RedStateFar Right

    Jamie Raskin Left Loaded verb“Fumbling”The headline judges Raskin’s response as a failure rather than reporting what he said.More neutral: respondsDisagree with this highlight? After Dan Crenshaw Loaded verb“Exposes”The verb presents Crenshaw’s argument as proven rather than as his claim.More neutral: arguesDisagree with this highlight? a Dem Party Partisan shorthand“Pre-Election Ploy”The label names Crenshaw’s motive as settled fact in the outlet’s own voice.More neutral: move made before the electionDisagree with this highlight?

    Republican Rep. Dan Crenshaw (TX-02) brought two Senate votes to CNN’s midterm postmortem Wednesday. One was on a bill restricting stock purchases by members of Congress. …

  • Dan Crenshaw and Jamie Raskin Get Into Heated Clash on CNN

    Wednesday on CNN’s “Election Day in America,” Reps. Dan Crenshaw (R-TX) and Jamie Raskin (D-MD) had a heated debate. Crenshaw said, “I bet they’re willing to work with Trump on this after the midterms.” Raskin asked, “Donald Trump wants to

The stories you read build My Mix, a private picture of which sides cover the stories you choose, kept on this device. What is My Mix?

The left is Far Left and Left together. The right is Right and Far Right together. Every outlet keeps its own five-point rating.

Who reported it when

How the coverage built up

  • Left

    First to report

    Raw Story, Nov 4, 4:01 PM EST

  • Center

    No report yet

    From the outlets Mantle follows

  • Right

    2 hr 43 min later

    Its first report, Nov 4, 6:44 PM EST

See the order the outlets reported inHide the order
  1. Raw StoryFar LeftNov 4, 4:01 PM EST
  2. Breitbart NewsFar RightNov 4, 6:44 PM EST
  3. RedStateFar RightNov 4, 9:30 PM EST

Times are the ones the outlets published in their own feeds, in Eastern time. Opinion is left out.

Help someone else find the truth beneath the surface

Most people see one side of a story. Share this one, so they can see how every side is telling it and decide for themselves.

Email it
Embed

Show this story’s coverage card on your own site, blog or class page. It has the headline, who is covering it and a link back here, and it tracks nobody. See the card

Seen a mistake? Tell us what is wrong with this page