Crime & JusticeBreaking
Federal judge rules New York’s ban on buying body armor unconstitutional
By Mantle News
Coverage spectrum
Covered by 3 outlets, all right-leaning.
6 articles in total, 2 of them opinion. The spectrum counts each outlet once and leaves opinion out. How we measure bias
Five right-leaning outlets, Just the News, Reason, RedState, Breitbart News and Townhall, report that U.S. District Judge John Sinatra of the Western District of New York ruled in Heeter v. James that New York’s ban on buying body armor is unconstitutional. The outlets say the judge granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and stayed his order for 14 days to give the state time to appeal. The law bars law-abiding residents who are not engaged or employed in an eligible profession from buying body armor for self-defense; New York said it was enacted “to further strengthen gun laws.” The ruling, as quoted in the reports, rests on the Second Amendment and on the Supreme Court’s 2008 decision in D.C. v. Heller on the meaning of “arms.”
Headline and summary written by Mantle’s AI from the coverage below, under published rules. How this works
What happened
Key points
Each point shows who reports it, from Far Left to Far Right.
A federal judge ruled New York’s ban on buying body armor unconstitutional.
One side only: the rightReported byRight1Far Right3See the outletsHide the outlets
- Right
- Reason
- Far Right
- Just the News, Breitbart News, Townhall
The judge granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment.
One outletJust the News· Far Right
The judge stayed his order for 14 days to give the state time to appeal.
One outletJust the News· Far Right
The law bars law-abiding residents not engaged or employed in an eligible profession from buying body armor for self-defense.
One outletReason· Right
Judge John Sinatra issued the decision in Heeter v. James in the Western District of New York.
One outletReason· Right
How each side tells it
Compare views
Every outlet in this sample reports that a federal judge ruled New York’s ban on buying body armor unconstitutional. Only right-side outlets are present, and they tell it as a Second Amendment victory, emphasizing the ban’s effect on law-abiding residents.
the left
No coverage yet
No left-leaning outlet that Mantle follows has covered this story yet. That absence is part of the picture.
the center
No coverage yet
No center outlet that Mantle follows has covered this story yet. That absence is part of the picture.
the right
3 outlets · 2 opinion
Headlines present the ruling as a Second Amendment win that strikes down a ban violating the Constitution; far-right outlets are the most celebratory, while Reason’s headline states the ruling plainly.
Federal Judge Rules Against New York: Body Armor Ban Violates the Second Amendment
Breitbart NewsFar RightAll right-leaning headlines
The words they chose
Language to notice
Words that carry a judgement beyond the facts. Tap a highlighted word anywhere on the page to see why.
Left
Has not covered this story.
Center
Has not covered this story.
Right4
Major 2A Winas many gun controls as possibleinsistedWanted to Prevent
In the outlets’ own words
Sensational language
Major 2A WinMore neutral: Second Amendment ruling
The phrase adds a judgement that the ruling is a victory for one side, while the event itself is a court ruling.
New York Body Armor Ban Ruled Unconstitutional in Major 2A Win
Used byRedState (Far Right)
Loaded modifier
as many gun controls as possibleMore neutral: as part of a broader package of gun control measures
Describes the lawmakers' motive in a way the excerpt does not support with evidence, implying an aim beyond the ban itself.
…the state’s body armor ban as part of their larger attempt to enact as many gun controls as possible following the U.S.
Used byBreitbart News (Far Right)
Loaded verb
insistedMore neutral: said
The verb suggests the state’s stated rationale was unreasonable, where a neutral verb would only report that it was stated.
…in 2022 after the racially motivated mass shooting at a grocery store in Buffalo and insisted that body armor is “a tactical accessory to firearms.” Two residents and the Firearms…
Used byTownhall (Far Right)
Loaded verb
Wanted to PreventMore neutral: Banned
The phrase attributes a motive to the state in the outlet’s own voice, which the coverage does not establish.
This State Wanted to Prevent Residents From Owning Body Armor.
Used byTownhall (Far Right)
See for yourself
Side by side
What each side leads with and what it leaves out. Open a side to read its headlines.
From the left
0 outletsNo left-leaning outlet that Mantle follows has covered this story yet. That absence is part of the picture.
From the center
0 outletsNo center outlet that Mantle follows has covered this story yet. That absence is part of the picture.
From the right
3 outlets · 2 opinionLeads with
- Second Amendment violation
- impact on law-abiding residents’ self-defense
- Heller precedent on meaning of arms
See the 5 headlines from the rightHide the headlines
- TownhallFar Right
This State Loaded verb“Wanted to Prevent”The phrase attributes a motive to the state in the outlet’s own voice, which the coverage does not establish.More neutral: BannedDisagree with this highlight? Residents From Owning Body Armor. A Federal Judge Just Said 'No.'
A federal judge struck down New York’s ban on body armor for ordinary residents, ruling that it violates the Second Amendment.
- Breitbart NewsFar Right
Federal Judge Rules Against New York: Body Armor Ban Violates the Second Amendment
U.S. District Judge John L. Sinatra, Jr., ruled against New York's ban on body armor, noting that it violates the Second Amendment.
- Just the NewsFar Right
Federal judge rules NY's ban on buying body armor unconstitutional
Both the plaintiff and state had filed for summary judgment in their favor, with the judge granting the plaintiff's motion. Sinatra stayed his own order for 14 days to give the state time to appeal.
1 more from Just the News
New York Body Armor Ban Ruled Unconstitutional in Sensational language“Major 2A Win”The phrase adds a judgement that the ruling is a victory for one side, while the event itself is a court ruling.More neutral: Second Amendment rulingDisagree with this highlight?
I've always been a little bemused at the notion of heavy body armor, unless one is a cop or a soldier, or unless you live in one of America's major cities where the chance of being used for impromptu target practice is a possibility. …
Body Armor Ban Struck Down by N.Y. Federal Court
From today's decision by Judge John Sinatra (W.D.N.Y.) in Heeter v. James: New York enacted a first-of-its-kind law prohibiting law-abiding residents-who…
Articles you open from here build My Mix, a private picture of how your reading spreads across the spectrum, kept on this device. What is My Mix?
The left is Far Left and Left together. The right is Right and Far Right together. Every outlet keeps its own five-point rating.
Read next
More on Crime & Justice
Crime & JusticeBreaking
Shooting from a vehicle in Trappes, near Paris, kills one and wounds four; suspect arrested
4 outlets
More on Crime & Justice
Crime & JusticeBreaking
Macron announces bans on some French protests after weekend riots
11 outletsQuiet on the right
Next in today’s stories
WorldBreaking
Israel orders West Bank closure preparations after two men killed in Hebron shooting
13 outlets
22 outlets
A story one side mostly skipped
Crime & JusticeBreaking
Teen arrested in alleged plot to kill Rep. Keith Self, federal sources say
13 outletsQuiet on the left