Skip to content

Government & PolicyDeveloping

Federal review ends on Trump's planned 250-foot arch near Arlington Cemetery

By

Coverage spectrum

Covered by 4 outlets. No right-leaning outlet that Mantle follows has covered it yet.

6 articles in total, 2 of them opinion. The spectrum counts each outlet once and leaves opinion out. How we measure bias

A federal historic preservation agency has ended its consultation with Virginia and Washington, D.C. officials over President Trump's planned 250-foot 'Triumphal Arch' near Arlington National Cemetery, clearing the way for the project to proceed without local agreement. The National Park Service has acknowledged the arch would have 'adverse effects' on the surrounding historic landscape, and Virginia officials say it would 'mar' the area. Trump has said the arch would double as a military complex able to house drones, snipers and equipment, which he has described as serving national security purposes. Sen. Tammy Duckworth called the plan 'foolhardy' and urged federal aviation officials to reject it, though the FAA has ruled the structure would not pose a risk to nearby flights. Excavation work has reportedly begun at the site, and the administration says it does not need congressional approval, citing a 1925 authorization.

Headline and summary written by Mantle’s AI from the coverage below, under published rules. How this works

What happened

Key points

Each point shows who reports it, from Far Left to Far Right.

  1. The planned arch would stand 250 feet tall near Arlington National Cemetery and the Lincoln Memorial

    Reported byLeftCenter

  2. The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation ended required consultation with Virginia and D.C. officials on Thursday

    Reported byLeftCenter

  3. Virginia officials say the arch would 'mar' the historic landscape

    Reported byLeftCenter

  4. Trump announced the arch would double as a military complex housing drones, snipers and ammunition for 'national security' purposes

    Reported byLeftCenter

  5. The administration argues it does not need congressional approval, citing a 1925 project authorization

    Reported byLeft

Show 2 more pointsShow fewer points

  1. The FAA ruled the structure would not pose a risk to flights near Reagan National Airport

    Reported byCenter

  2. Excavation work has reportedly begun at the proposed site

    Reported byLeft

What is contested

Where accounts differ

Points the coverage does not agree on, and who says what.

  • Whether the arch project requires congressional approval

    The Trump administration claims a 1925 authorization for the nearby Arlington Memorial Bridge covers the arch and that congressional approval is unnecessary, a claim reported by The New Republic; other outlets note veterans and an architectural historian are suing, arguing Congress never authorized the arch, as reported by Slate.

  • Whether the arch and its military features pose a safety risk to nearby air traffic

    Sen. Tammy Duckworth argues the structure and planned drone/sniper operations pose risks near a busy flight path, per BBC; the FAA has ruled the structure would not pose a risk to flights, also per BBC.

How each side tells it

Compare views

  • the left

    2 outlets · 1 opinion

    Mainstream left outlets (ABC) report the procedural developments straightforwardly, while the further-left outlets (The New Republic, Slate) frame the story around Trump's legal tactics and use skeptical or mocking language about the project's justification.

    Federal agency says it's moving on without DC, Virginia cooperation on Trump's arch
    ABC NewsLeftAll left-leaning headlines

  • the center

    2 outlets

    Center outlets describe the procedural and regulatory status of the project in neutral terms, noting both preservation concerns and the FAA's safety assessment.

    Trump's plans for massive arch move ahead
    BBC NewsCenterAll center headlines

  • the right

    No coverage yet

    No right-leaning outlet that Mantle follows has covered this story yet. That absence is part of the picture.

The words they chose

Language to notice

Words that carry a judgement beyond the facts. Tap a highlighted word anywhere on the page to see why.

  • Left5

    get-out-of-court-free cardillegal White House ballroom projectHarebrained Schemesthe air of an Avengers subplot, not a serious proposal from a U.S. president

  • Center1

    blasting Trump's plans

  • Right

    Has not covered this story.

In the outlets’ own words

  • Sensational language

    get-out-of-court-free cardMore neutral: a broad legal justification

    Dramatizes the legal argument rather than describing it factually.

    …Donald Trump appears to think that the phrase “national security” is a get-out-of-court-free card whenever he wants to do (or get away with) something.

    Used byThe New Republic (Far Left)

  • Absolutist framing

    illegal White House ballroom projectMore neutral: White House ballroom project, which a lower court had blocked

    Presents a contested legal characterization as settled fact.

    Last month, the justices allowed his illegal White House ballroom project to move forward after a lower court had blocked it.

    Used byThe New Republic (Far Left)

  • Loaded modifier

    Harebrained SchemesMore neutral: Legal Justifications

    Labels the administration's actions as foolish rather than describing them neutrally.

    The Magic Words Trump Uses to Legally Justify His Harebrained Schemes

    Used byThe New Republic (Far Left)

  • Sensational language

    the air of an Avengers subplot, not a serious proposal from a U.S. presidentMore neutral: an unusual proposal

    Uses mocking, dramatic comparison rather than neutral description.

    The whole thing has the air of an Avengers subplot, not a serious proposal from a U.S. president.

    Used bySlate (Far Left)

Show 2 more phrasesShow fewer

  • Delegitimizing label

    Perfected His Favorite New Legal PretextMore neutral: Uses National Security Rationale Again

    Characterizes the administration's legal reasoning as a deliberate pretext rather than a contested legal position.

    Trump Perfected His Favorite New Legal Pretext in Environmental Cases

    Used bySlate (Far Left)

  • Loaded verb

    blasting Trump's plansMore neutral: criticizing Trump's plans

    Describes the senator's criticism with a dramatic verb rather than a neutral one like 'criticizing'.

    …arch, and using it for military purposes, is growing with one Democrat blasting Trump's plans as "foolhardy".

    Used byBBC News (Center)

See the full language guide

See for yourself

Side by side

What each side leads with and what it leaves out. Open a side to read its headlines.

From the left

2 outlets · 1 opinion

Leads with

  • Legal justification via 'national security' claims
  • Administration bypassing Congress or courts
  • Environmental and preservation concerns
  • Excavation and construction progress

Leaves out

  • The FAA's ruling that the structure poses no aviation risk
  • Sen. Duckworth's specific safety objections

Reported by other sides, not found in this side’s coverage.

See the 3 headlines from the leftHide the headlines
  • ABC NewsLeft

    Federal agency says it's moving on without DC, Virginia cooperation on Trump's arch

    Virginia agency says the Park Service hasn't tried to resolve opposition.

    Read at ABC News (opens in a new tab)
  • The New RepublicFar Left

    Trump Is Already Breaking Ground for His Triumphal Arch

    Excavation work has already begun at the proposed site of Donald Trump’s 250-foot “Triumphal Arch.” Construction crews were spotted at Memorial Circle on Columbia Island Thursday morning, surrounded by fences and accompanied by a small drilling rig, according to photographs …

    Read at The New Republic (opens in a new tab)
    1 more from The New Republic
  • SlateFar LeftOpinion

    Trump Delegitimizing label“Perfected His Favorite New Legal Pretext”Characterizes the administration's legal reasoning as a deliberate pretext rather than a contested legal position.More neutral: Uses National Security Rationale AgainDisagree with this highlight? in Environmental Cases

    He announced that his planned 250-foot triumphal arch between the Lincoln Memorial and Arlington National Cemetery would become a “Military Complex.”

    Read at Slate (opens in a new tab)

From the center

2 outlets

Leads with

  • End of the federal preservation consultation process
  • Virginia and D.C. officials' objections
  • Military-use plans and safety concerns raised by lawmakers
  • FAA's risk assessment

Leaves out

  • The administration's legal argument that congressional approval is unnecessary
  • Details of the 1925 authorization being cited

Reported by other sides, not found in this side’s coverage.

See the 2 headlines from the centerHide the headlines
  • BBC NewsCenter

    Trump's plans for massive arch move ahead

    Opposition to building the 250-foot arch, and using it for military purposes, is growing with one Democrat Loaded verb“blasting Trump's plans”Describes the senator's criticism with a dramatic verb rather than a neutral one like 'criticizing'.More neutral: criticizing Trump's plansDisagree with this highlight? as "foolhardy".

    Read at BBC News (opens in a new tab)
  • Straight Arrow NewsCenter

    Federal preservation review ends for Trump arch, final approval still pending

    Virginia officials say the arch would “mar” the landscape around Arlington National Cemetery and want the administration to consider changes.

    Read at Straight Arrow News (opens in a new tab)

From the right

0 outlets

No right-leaning outlet that Mantle follows has covered this story yet. That absence is part of the picture.

Articles you open from here build My Mix, a private picture of how your reading spreads across the spectrum, kept on this device. What is My Mix?

The left is Far Left and Left together. The right is Right and Far Right together. Every outlet keeps its own five-point rating.

Who reported it when

How the coverage built up

  • Left

    First to report

    The New Republic, Sep 24, 12:53 PM EDT

  • Center

    19 hr 7 min later

    Its first report, Sep 25, 8:00 AM EDT

  • Right

    No report yet

    From the outlets Mantle follows

See the order the outlets reported inHide the order
  1. The New RepublicFar LeftSep 24, 12:53 PM EDT
  2. Straight Arrow NewsCenterSep 25, 8:00 AM EDT
  3. ABC NewsLeftSep 25, 11:58 AM EDT
  4. BBC NewsCenterSep 25, 2:27 PM EDT

Times are the ones the outlets published in their own feeds, in Eastern time. Opinion is left out.

Read next

Help someone else find the truth beneath the surface

Most people see one side of a story. Share this one, so they can see how every side is telling it and decide for themselves.

Email it

Seen a mistake? Tell us what is wrong with this page