Skip to content

PoliticsDeveloping

Former HHS adviser Calley Means alleges Trump advisers favored donors over health policy

By

Coverage spectrum

Covered by 3 outlets, all left-leaning.

4 articles in total. The spectrum counts each outlet once and leaves opinion out. How we measure bias

Raw Story, The Washington Post and The New York Times report that former HHS adviser Calley Means accused top Trump administration aides of favoring special interests in a two-hour interview with Joe Rogan. Means said White House chief of staff Susie Wiles put midterm fundraising ahead of health policy, and that pollster Tony Fabrizio decides which policies are politically viable, though his website lists clients such as Pepsi and pharmaceutical companies. Raw Story reports that Trump announced hours after the interview that he was replacing Wiles. The allegations are Means’s; the articles do not include records that confirm them.

Headline and summary written by Mantle’s AI from the coverage below, under published rules. Editors read every story. How this works

What happened

Key points

Each point shows who reports it, from Far Left to Far Right.

  1. Calley Means told Joe Rogan that Susie Wiles and other top aides put midterm fundraising ahead of health policy.

    One side only: the leftReported byFar Left1Left1See the outletsHide the outlets
    Far Left
    Raw Story
    Left
    The New York Times

  2. Means said pollster Tony Fabrizio decides which policies are politically viable, though his website lists clients such as Pepsi and pharmaceutical companies.

    One outletRaw Story· Far Left

  3. Means claimed Wiles’s team loosened planned limits on kratom products after lobbying from the industry.

    One outletRaw Story· Far Left

  4. Trump announced he was replacing Wiles as chief of staff hours after the interview.

    One outletRaw Story· Far Left

How each side tells it

Compare views

Raw Story, The Washington Post and The New York Times report that former HHS adviser Calley Means told Joe Rogan that Trump advisers took special-interest money. The coverage presents this as Means’s accusation, with Raw Story’s headlines adding sharper language about Susie Wiles.

  • the left

    3 outlets

    Headlines are sharper at Raw Story, which calls the claim a bombshell and ties it to Wiles’s ouster, while The Washington Post and The New York Times state it as an accusation.

    Former White House health aide accuses Trump advisers of catering to special interests
    The Washington PostLeftAll left-leaning headlines

  • the center

    No coverage yet

    No center outlet that Mantle follows has covered this story yet. That absence is part of the picture.

  • the right

    No coverage yet

    No right-leaning outlet that Mantle follows has covered this story yet. That absence is part of the picture.

The words they chose

Language to notice

Words that carry a judgement beyond the facts. Tap a highlighted word anywhere on the page to see why.

  • Left3

    wallopedbombshellugly workings

  • Center

    Has not covered this story.

  • Right

    Has not covered this story.

In the outlets’ own words

  • Loaded verb

    wallopedMore neutral: accused

    “Walloped” casts the claim as a blow to Wiles before any response is reported.

    Susie Wiles walloped by bombshell claim on Joe Rogan's podcast hours before her ouster

    Used byRaw Story (Far Left)

  • Sensational language

    bombshellMore neutral: claim

    Calls the claim dramatic before its accuracy is established.

    Susie Wiles walloped by bombshell claim on Joe Rogan's podcast hours before her ouster

    Used byRaw Story (Far Left)

  • Sensational language

    ugly workingsMore neutral: internal workings

    “Ugly” is a judgement about the administration rather than a described fact.

    aide spills tea to Joe Rogan on ugly workings inside Trump administration

    Used byRaw Story (Far Left)

See the full language guide

See for yourself

Side by side

What each side leads with and what it leaves out. Open a side to read its headlines.

From the left

3 outlets

Leads with

  • Susie Wiles and midterm fundraising
  • Industry lobbying and special-interest money
  • Pollster Tony Fabrizio’s role
  • Health policy sidelined
See the 3 headlines from the leftHide the headlines

From the center

0 outlets

No center outlet that Mantle follows has covered this story yet. That absence is part of the picture.

From the right

0 outlets

No right-leaning outlet that Mantle follows has covered this story yet. That absence is part of the picture.

The stories you read build My Mix, a private picture of which sides cover the stories you choose, kept on this device. What is My Mix?

The left is Far Left and Left together. The right is Right and Far Right together. Every outlet keeps its own five-point rating.

Who reported it when

How the coverage built up

  • Left

    First to report

    The New York Times, Nov 6, 1:42 PM EST

  • Center

    No report yet

    From the outlets Mantle follows

  • Right

    No report yet

    From the outlets Mantle follows

See the order the outlets reported inHide the order
  1. The New York TimesLeftNov 6, 1:42 PM EST
  2. The Washington PostLeftNov 6, 3:30 PM EST
  3. Raw StoryFar LeftNov 6, 4:04 PM EST

Times are the ones the outlets published in their own feeds, in Eastern time. Opinion is left out.

Read next

Help someone else find the truth beneath the surface

Most people see one side of a story. Share this one, so they can see how every side is telling it and decide for themselves.

Email it
Embed

Show this story’s coverage card on your own site, blog or class page. It has the headline, who is covering it and a link back here, and it tracks nobody. See the card

Seen a mistake? Tell us what is wrong with this page