Skip to content

PoliticsDeveloping

Voters in four states decide ballot measures on transgender athletes in girls’ sports

By

Coverage spectrum

Covered by 3 outlets, mostly right-leaning (67%).

4 articles in total, 1 of them opinion. The spectrum counts each outlet once and leaves opinion out. How we measure bias

Voters in Arizona, Nebraska, Washington and Colorado were deciding ballot measures on transgender athletes in girls’ sports on Tuesday, November 3, according to Fox News and NewsNation. In Washington, The Center Square reports that Initiative 638, which would keep biological males who identify as female out of girls’ and women’s sports, was ahead in early returns Tuesday night, while two other initiatives were failing. Early returns are not final. Jennifer Sey of XX-XY Athletics said she is hopeful that Washington and Colorado will draw a line on the issue.

Headline and summary written by Mantle’s AI from the coverage below, under published rules. Editors read every story. How this works

What happened

Key points

Each point shows who reports it, from Far Left to Far Right.

  1. Ballot measures on transgender athletes in girls’ sports were on the ballot Tuesday, November 3, in four states.

    One outletFox News· Far Right

  2. Washington’s Initiative 638, which would keep biological males who identify as female out of girls’ and women’s sports, was ahead in early returns Tuesday night.

    One outletThe Center Square· Right

  3. Jennifer Sey of XX-XY Athletics said she is hopeful that Washington and Colorado will draw a line on the issue.

    One outletTheBlaze· Far Right

How each side tells it

Compare views

Center and right coverage both report the November 3 votes in four states on measures about transgender athletes in girls’ sports. Right-side headlines lean toward protecting girls’ sports and national stakes, while the center’s live-results headline stays descriptive.

  • the left

    No coverage yet

    No left-leaning outlet that Mantle follows has covered this story yet. That absence is part of the picture.

  • the center

    1 outlet

    The center’s only headline is a neutral live-results label that names the measures without judging them, and it comes from a single outlet’s report.

    Live results: Transgender student-athlete ballot measures
    NewsNationCenterAll center headlines
  • the right

    2 outlets · 1 opinion

    Right-side headlines frame the votes as protecting girls’ sports or as a national or blue-state test, with the Far Right outlets stressing national stakes and The Center Square reporting early results as outcomes.

    Washington initiative to Partisan shorthand“protect girls sports”The phrase adopts the measure supporters’ framing as the name of the initiative, while the excerpt describes it neutrally as keeping certain athletes out of girls’ and women’s sports.More neutral: measure on girls’ and women’s sports eligibilityDisagree with this highlight? Loaded verb“passing”The headline states a result as settled while the text reports only that the initiative was ahead in early returns.More neutral: ahead in early returnsDisagree with this highlight?, two other initiatives failing
    The Center SquareRightAll right-leaning headlines

The words they chose

Language to notice

Words that carry a judgement beyond the facts. Tap a highlighted word anywhere on the page to see why.

  • Left

    Has not covered this story.

  • Center0

    No loaded words in its own voice.

  • Right3

    keep boys out of girls' sportsprotect girls sportspassing

In the outlets’ own words

  • Partisan shorthand

    keep boys out of girls' sportsMore neutral: the fight over whether transgender athletes may compete in girls’ sports

    The wording adopts one side’s framing of the measures as the stated aim, in the outlet’s own voice.

    The fight to keep boys out of girls' sports is heading for a major test at the ballot box — and the results could…

    Used byTheBlaze (Far Right)

  • Partisan shorthand

    protect girls sportsMore neutral: measure on girls’ and women’s sports eligibility

    The phrase adopts the measure supporters’ framing as the name of the initiative, while the excerpt describes it neutrally as keeping certain athletes out of girls’ and women’s sports.

    Washington initiative to protect girls sports passing, two other initiatives failing

    Used byThe Center Square (Right)

  • Loaded verb

    passingMore neutral: ahead in early returns

    The headline states a result as settled while the text reports only that the initiative was ahead in early returns.

    Washington initiative to protect girls sports passing, two other initiatives failing

    Used byThe Center Square (Right)

See the full language guide

See for yourself

Side by side

What each side leads with and what it leaves out. Open a side to read its headlines.

From the left

0 outlets

No left-leaning outlet that Mantle follows has covered this story yet. That absence is part of the picture.

From the center

1 outlet

Leads with

  • live vote results
  • the measures themselves
See the headline from the centerHide the headlines

From the right

2 outlets · 1 opinion

Leads with

  • protecting girls’ sports
  • national stakes
  • two blue states
See the 3 headlines from the rightHide the headlines
  • Washington initiative to Partisan shorthand“protect girls sports”The phrase adopts the measure supporters’ framing as the name of the initiative, while the excerpt describes it neutrally as keeping certain athletes out of girls’ and women’s sports.More neutral: measure on girls’ and women’s sports eligibilityDisagree with this highlight? Loaded verb“passing”The headline states a result as settled while the text reports only that the initiative was ahead in early returns.More neutral: ahead in early returnsDisagree with this highlight?, two other initiatives failing

    (The Center Square) - Tuesday night saw a mixed bag of results for three initiatives on the Nov. 3 ballot that consumed a great deal of public debate leading up election day.

  • Fox NewsFar Right

    Four states vote Tuesday on ballot measures that could reshape girls' and women's sports nationwide

    Voters in Arizona, Nebraska, Washington and Colorado face Tuesday ballot measures on transgender athletes in girls sports and locker room policies.

  • TheBlazeFar RightOpinion

    Glenn Beck: Two blue states could CHANGE the women's sports debate

    The fight to Partisan shorthand“keep boys out of girls' sports”The wording adopts one side’s framing of the measures as the stated aim, in the outlet’s own voice.More neutral: the fight over whether transgender athletes may compete in girls’ sportsDisagree with this highlight? is heading for a major test at the ballot box — and the results could change everything. Founder and CEO of XX-XY Athletics Jennifer Sey is hopeful that the blue states potentially affected might be ready to finally draw a line. …

The stories you read build My Mix, a private picture of which sides cover the stories you choose, kept on this device. What is My Mix?

The left is Far Left and Left together. The right is Right and Far Right together. Every outlet keeps its own five-point rating.

Who reported it when

How the coverage built up

  • Left

    No report yet

    From the outlets Mantle follows

  • Center

    10 hr 59 min later

    Its first report, Nov 3, 6:00 AM EST

  • Right

    First to report

    Fox News, Nov 2, 7:01 PM EST

See the order the outlets reported inHide the order
  1. Fox NewsFar RightNov 2, 7:01 PM EST
  2. NewsNationCenterNov 3, 6:00 AM EST
  3. The Center SquareRightNov 4, 12:30 AM EST

Times are the ones the outlets published in their own feeds, in Eastern time. Opinion is left out.

Help someone else find the truth beneath the surface

Most people see one side of a story. Share this one, so they can see how every side is telling it and decide for themselves.

Email it
Embed

Show this story’s coverage card on your own site, blog or class page. It has the headline, who is covering it and a link back here, and it tracks nobody. See the card

Seen a mistake? Tell us what is wrong with this page