Skip to content

Health

Infant bleeding rates rise as more parents decline vitamin K shots, studies find

By

Coverage spectrum

Covered by 3 outlets, mostly left-leaning (67%).

3 articles in total. The spectrum counts each outlet once and leaves opinion out. How we measure bias

Close-up of a clinician in white coat with stenoscope holding a syringe, patient blurred behind
Image via The New York TimesHow images are chosenReport this image

Two studies published Thursday report that bleeding rates in US infants have risen since 2017 as more parents decline the vitamin K shot given at birth. The studies analyzed electronic health records for 5.2 million babies born from 2017 to 2025, according to the New York Post, which reports that about 4.5% had no documented shot. One study found a 347 percent increase in cases as fewer babies received the shot, the New York Times reports. The New York Post reports that bleeding episodes doubled within a year. Reuters reports that refusals accelerated under Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. The shot prevents vitamin K deficiency bleeding, a rare but potentially fatal condition, the Post says.

Headline and summary written by Mantle’s AI from the coverage below, under published rules. Editors read every story. How this works

What happened

Key points

Each point shows who reports it, from Far Left to Far Right.

  1. Two studies published Thursday report that bleeding rates in US infants have risen since 2017.

    Reported byFar Left1Left1Right1See the outletsHide the outlets
    Far Left
    HuffPost
    Left
    The New York Times
    Right
    New York Post
  2. As more parents decline the vitamin K shot given at birth, infant bleeding rates have risen, according to the studies.

    Reported byFar Left1Left1Right1See the outletsHide the outlets
    Far Left
    HuffPost
    Left
    The New York Times
    Right
    New York Post
  3. The studies analyzed electronic health records for 5.2 million babies born in the US from 2017 to 2025.

    One outletNew York Post· Right

  4. About 4.5% of those infants had no documented vitamin K shot.

    One outletNew York Post· Right

  5. One study found a 347 percent increase in cases as fewer babies received the shot.

    One outletThe New York Times· Left

Show 2 more pointsShow fewer points
  1. Reporting says vitamin K refusals accelerated under Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

    One outletHuffPost· Far Left

  2. A single vitamin K shot can prevent vitamin K deficiency bleeding, a rare but potentially fatal condition.

    One outletNew York Post· Right

How each side tells it

Compare views

Every side reports that infant bleeding rates rose as more parents declined the vitamin K shot given at birth. The left-side outlets emphasize vaccine mistrust and Kennedy’s role, while the right-side outlet frames the refusals as a dangerous mistake against 60 years of medical advice.

  • the left

    2 outlets

    Both left-side headlines present the bleeding rise as linked to parents rejecting vitamin K shots, with HuffPost’s description adding Kennedy’s role and the wider mistrust of vaccines.

    Infant Bleeding Surged as Parents Rejected Vitamin K Shots, Studies Find
    The New York TimesLeftAll left-leaning headlines
  • the center

    No coverage yet

    No center outlet that Mantle follows has covered this story yet. That absence is part of the picture.

  • the right

    1 outlet

    The New York Post frames the rise as a dangerous parental mistake, stressing that rejecting the shot defies 60 years of medical recommendations and that vaccines are slipping too.

    Life-threatening infant bleeding rates have doubled in a year as parents make Loaded modifier“dangerous mistake”Calls the parents’ choice a mistake, a judgement the studies as described do not state.More neutral: as more parents decline vitamin K shotsDisagree with this highlight?
    New York PostRightAll right-leaning headlines

The words they chose

Language to notice

Words that carry a judgement beyond the facts. Tap a highlighted word anywhere on the page to see why.

  • Left1

    staggering

  • Center

    Has not covered this story.

  • Right2

    troubling risedangerous mistake

In the outlets’ own words

  • Sensational language

    staggeringMore neutral: 347 percent increase

    The adjective adds drama that the reported percentage does not need.

    One study found a staggering 347 percent increase in cases as fewer babies received the shot, which helps blood…

    Used byThe New York Times (Left)

  • Sensational language

    troubling riseMore neutral: rise

    The adjective adds the outlet’s own judgement to the reported rise.

    …warning that the shift away from the decades-old practice is coinciding with a troubling rise in potentially deadly bleeding episodes among infants.

    Used byNew York Post (Right)

  • Loaded modifier

    dangerous mistakeMore neutral: as more parents decline vitamin K shots

    Calls the parents’ choice a mistake, a judgement the studies as described do not state.

    Life-threatening infant bleeding rates have doubled in a year as parents make dangerous mistake

    Used byNew York Post (Right)

See the full language guide

See for yourself

Side by side

What each side leads with and what it leaves out. Open a side to read its headlines.

From the left

2 outlets

Leads with

  • rising infant bleeding rates
  • parents refusing vitamin K shots
  • Kennedy’s role and vaccine mistrust

Leaves out

  • the 4.5% of infants with no recorded vitamin K shot
  • the doubling of bleeding episodes within a year

Reported by other sides, not found in this side’s coverage.

See the 2 headlines from the leftHide the headlines
  • HuffPostFar LeftReuters report

    U.S. Infant Bleeding Episodes Jump As Vitamin K Refusals Rise, Two Studies Find

    The refusals have accelerated under Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. amid a wave of mistrust toward vaccines and other newborn interventions.

  • Infant Bleeding Surged as Parents Rejected Vitamin K Shots, Studies Find

    One study found a Sensational language“staggering”The adjective adds drama that the reported percentage does not need.More neutral: 347 percent increaseDisagree with this highlight? 347 percent increase in cases as fewer babies received the shot, which helps blood clot.

From the center

0 outlets

No center outlet that Mantle follows has covered this story yet. That absence is part of the picture.

From the right

1 outlet

Leads with

  • parents rejecting a routine newborn treatment
  • 60 years of medical recommendations
  • broader decline in infant vaccination

Leaves out

  • the role of Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in the rise in refusals
  • the 347 percent increase reported in one study

Reported by other sides, not found in this side’s coverage.

See the headline from the rightHide the headlines
  • Life-threatening infant bleeding rates have doubled in a year as parents make Loaded modifier“dangerous mistake”Calls the parents’ choice a mistake, a judgement the studies as described do not state.More neutral: as more parents decline vitamin K shotsDisagree with this highlight?

    Vaccination rates aren't the only thing falling among the nation's youngest.

The stories you read build My Mix, a private picture of which sides cover the stories you choose, kept on this device. What is My Mix?

The left is Far Left and Left together. The right is Right and Far Right together. Every outlet keeps its own five-point rating.

Who reported it when

How the coverage built up

  • Left

    First to report

    The New York Times, Nov 5, 11:38 AM EST

  • Center

    No report yet

    From the outlets Mantle follows

  • Right

    1 day later

    Its first report, Nov 6, 11:45 AM EST

See the order the outlets reported inHide the order
  1. The New York TimesLeftNov 5, 11:38 AM EST
  2. HuffPostFar LeftNov 5, 3:36 PM EST
  3. New York PostRightNov 6, 11:45 AM EST

Times are the ones the outlets published in their own feeds, in Eastern time. Opinion is left out.

Help someone else find the truth beneath the surface

Most people see one side of a story. Share this one, so they can see how every side is telling it and decide for themselves.

Email it
Embed

Show this story’s coverage card on your own site, blog or class page. It has the headline, who is covering it and a link back here, and it tracks nobody. See the card

Seen a mistake? Tell us what is wrong with this page