Skip to content

PoliticsBreaking

Federal judge strikes down Justice Department policy on state voter rolls

By

Coverage spectrum

Covered by 11 outlets across the spectrum.

11 articles in total. The spectrum counts each outlet once and leaves opinion out. How we measure bias

Department of Justice seal mounted on a wooden podium with dark blue panel
Image via New York PostHow images are chosenReport this image

A federal judge in Washington, Sparkle Sooknanan, ruled Friday that the Justice Department’s effort to collect state voter rolls and check them against the SAVE immigration database is unlawful, and struck down the policy. In a 78-page decision in a challenge brought by the voting group Common Cause, the judge said the department had understated the risk that the database could wrongly remove eligible citizens from voter rolls, and that Congress left election authority with the states. Accounts differ on the order’s reach: some describe it as covering states that voluntarily supplied records, while Bloomberg describes it as blocking a key component of the effort. The ruling comes before the November 3 midterm elections. At least 18 states had supplied unredacted voter records to the department, according to one report.

Headline and summary written by Mantle’s AI from the coverage below, under published rules. How this works

What happened

Key points

Each point shows who reports it, from Far Left to Far Right.

  1. A federal judge in Washington ruled Friday that the Justice Department’s policy of collecting state voter rolls and checking them against the SAVE immigration database is unlawful.

    Across the spectrumReported byLeft6Center2Right2Far Right1See the outletsHide the outlets
    Left
    Bloomberg, The Guardian, Al Jazeera English, The Washington Post, CBS News, TheGrio
    Center
    Straight Arrow News, The Hill
    Right
    The Washington Times, New York Post
    Far Right
    PJ Media

  2. The ruling vacated the Justice Department’s nationwide Voter List Maintenance Policy.

    Reported byLeft1Center1Far Right1See the outletsHide the outlets
    Left
    TheGrio
    Center
    The Hill
    Far Right
    PJ Media

  3. The order also blocks the program in states that voluntarily gave the department their voter records.

    Reported byCenter1Far Right1See the outletsHide the outlets
    Center
    The Hill
    Far Right
    PJ Media

  4. The judge wrote that the department had understated the risk that the database could wrongly remove eligible citizens from voter rolls.

    Reported byLeft1Right1See the outletsHide the outlets
    Left
    TheGrio
    Right
    New York Post

  5. The ruling comes weeks before the November 3 midterm elections.

    Reported byLeft1Right1Far Right1See the outletsHide the outlets
    Left
    TheGrio
    Right
    New York Post
    Far Right
    PJ Media
Show 2 more pointsShow fewer points

  1. The judge wrote that Congress had left election authority with the states.

    One outletNew York Post· Right

  2. A September Supreme Court order allowed wider use of the SAVE database in separate litigation.

    One outletTheGrio· Left

What is contested

Where accounts differ

Points the coverage does not agree on, and who says what.

  • The policy was unlawful or unconstitutional.

    Most outlets describe the ruling as finding the policy unlawful, which matches the supplied text of the New York Post item; its headline calls the policy unconstitutional.

  • The order covers states that voluntarily supplied voter records.

    The Hill and PJ Media say the order reaches states that voluntarily cooperated, while Bloomberg describes it as blocking a key component of the department’s effort.

How each side tells it

Compare views

  • the left

    6 outlets

    Left headlines lead with the judge striking down the policy of the Trump administration or the Justice Department, naming the administration, with the Guardian’s “Trump DoJ” wording the most pointed of the set.

    Judge strikes down Justice Department policy to use voter rolls for citizenship checks
    TheGrioLeftAll left-leaning headlines

  • the center

    2 outlets

    Center headlines name the judge and state the ruling plainly, with The Hill stressing that the order reaches even states that voluntarily cooperated and Straight Arrow News framing the policy as an effort to cull voters.

    Federal judge: DOJ cannot request states' voter lists for eligibility database
    The HillCenterAll center headlines

  • the right

    3 outlets

    Right headlines center the judge’s legal authority and the noncitizen rationale, with the Washington Times calling the effort a cleanup of noncitizens and the far-right PJ Media saying Congress never authorized the policy and that the order reaches beyond the mainstream framing; the New York Post item is a Reuters report under its own headline calling the policy unconstitutional.

    Trump’s DOJ Wanted State Voter Rolls, but a Judge Said Congress Never Authorized It
    PJ MediaFar RightAll right-leaning headlines

The words they chose

Language to notice

Words that carry a judgement beyond the facts. Tap a highlighted word anywhere on the page to see why.

  • Left0

    No loaded words in its own voice.

  • Center1

    cull voters from state rolls

  • Right4

    prod the states to bootcleansehas again interruptedpush to expand federal control over election administration

In the outlets’ own words

  • Loaded verb

    prod the states to bootMore neutral: ask the states to remove

    The verbs suggest pressure and forced expulsion, where the reported facts describe a federal request that states act on lists.

    …lists, run them through federal databases to identify noncitizens, then prod the states to boot those people from their rolls is illegal, a federal judge ruled Friday.

    Used byThe Washington Times (Right)

  • Loaded verb

    cleanseMore neutral: remove noncitizens from

    The verb implies the voter rolls are dirty and that removal is purification, which presumes the conclusion about who is on the rolls.

    Judge strikes down DOJ's effort to cleanse state voter rolls of noncitizens

    Used byThe Washington Times (Right)

  • Loaded verb

    cull voters from state rollsMore neutral: remove voters from state rolls

    Culling suggests selective weeding out of people, a judgement about the policy’s purpose that the article’s own reporting does not establish.

    Federal judge rules against Trump’s effort to cull voters from state rolls

    Used byStraight Arrow News (Center)

  • Loaded verb

    has again interruptedMore neutral: has again blocked

    Interrupted casts a court ruling as a disruption of government work, while the neutral description is that the court blocked the effort.

    With the November 3 midterms approaching, one district court has again interrupted a federal effort to check voter eligibility across state lines.

    Used byPJ Media (Far Right)

Show 1 more phrasesShow fewer

  • Partisan shorthand

    push to expand federal control over election administrationMore neutral: effort to play a larger federal role in election administration

    Describes the administration’s data request as an attempt to seize federal control, a conclusion about a contested policy stated in the outlet’s own voice.

    …marked the latest setback for President Donald Trump’s push to expand federal control over election administration ahead of the November 3 midterms, with his Republican Party…

    Used byNew York Post (Right)

See the full language guide

See for yourself

Side by side

What each side leads with and what it leaves out. Open a side to read its headlines.

From the left

6 outlets

Leads with

  • the ruling against the Trump administration
  • the risk of wrongly removing eligible voters
  • the use of federal immigration data to check voters
  • the judge’s finding that officials understated the risk of errors

Leaves out

  • the judge’s finding that Congress left election authority with the states
  • the order’s reach to states that voluntarily supplied records

Reported by other sides, not found in this side’s coverage.

See the 6 headlines from the leftHide the headlines
  • TheGrioLeft

    Judge strikes down Justice Department policy to use voter rolls for citizenship checks

    The ruling says the DOJ exceeded its authority and risked wrongly removing eligible voters from registration lists before the midterms.

    Read at TheGrio (opens in a new tab)
  • CBS NewsLeft

    Judge strikes down DOJ's policy of reviewing state voter rolls

    A federal judge has struck down the Trump administration's plan to check state voter rolls against federal immigration databases and press states to remove voters it determines are registered illegally.

    Read at CBS News (opens in a new tab)
  • The Washington PostLeft

    D.C. judge bars DOJ from gathering states’ voter lists to find noncitizens

    Voting rights groups had challenged the effort, noting federal data includes errors that have led to citizens being wrongly removed from electoral rolls.

    Read at The Washington Post (opens in a new tab)
  • Al Jazeera EnglishLeft

    US judge rules Trump administration’s use of voter data unlawful

    A federal judge ruled against the Justice Department's use of voter data to cross-reference an immigration database.

    Read at Al Jazeera English (opens in a new tab)
  • The GuardianLeft

    Federal judge rules against Trump DoJ’s policy of collecting state voter rolls

    Judge says justice department policy of checking state voter rolls against a federal immigration database is unlawful A federal judge ruled on Friday that the US justice department’s policy of collecting states’ unredacted voter rolls to check them against a federal immigration …

    Read at The Guardian (opens in a new tab)
  • BloombergLeft

    US Judge Blocks DOJ’s ‘Dragnet’ Probes of Voter Fraud Nationwide

    A US judge blocked a key component of the Justice Department’s efforts under the Trump administration to obtain state voter records as part of a nationwide probe into alleged election fraud by non-US citizens.

    Read at Bloomberg (opens in a new tab)

From the center

2 outlets

Leads with

  • the reach to states that voluntarily cooperated
  • the judge’s finding that the department exceeded its legal authority
  • violations of federal privacy law

Leaves out

  • the September Supreme Court order allowing wider use of the SAVE database

Reported by other sides, not found in this side’s coverage.

See the 2 headlines from the centerHide the headlines
  • The HillCenter

    Federal judge: DOJ cannot request states' voter lists for eligibility database

    A federal judge struck down on Friday the Justice Department’s nationwide effort to collect voter registration records and identify suspected non-U.S. citizens, blocking the Trump administration from continuing the program even in states that voluntarily cooperated. U.S. …

    Read at The Hill (opens in a new tab)
  • Straight Arrow NewsCenter

    Federal judge rules against Trump’s effort to Loaded verb“cull voters from state rolls”Culling suggests selective weeding out of people, a judgement about the policy’s purpose that the article’s own reporting does not establish.More neutral: remove voters from state rollsDisagree with this highlight?

    The judge said the Trump administration's move is “unlawful,” “arbitrary and capricious,” and “violates” federal privacy laws.

    Read at Straight Arrow News (opens in a new tab)

From the right

3 outlets

Leads with

  • Congress never authorized the policy
  • the wider reach to states that voluntarily cooperated
  • the aim of removing noncitizens from voter rolls
  • the November 3 midterms

Leaves out

  • the September Supreme Court order allowing wider use of the SAVE database

Reported by other sides, not found in this side’s coverage.

See the 3 headlines from the rightHide the headlines
  • New York PostRightReuters report

    US judge rules DOJ using state voter rolls unconstitutional

    US District Judge Sparkle Sooknanan ruled that the Justice Department's push to obtain state voter rolls to check citizenship status is unconstitutional.

    Read at New York Post (opens in a new tab)
  • PJ MediaFar Right

    Trump’s DOJ Wanted State Voter Rolls, but a Judge Said Congress Never Authorized It

    A federal judge in Washington did far more Friday than reject another Justice Department demand for voter records. U.S. District Judge Sparkle Sooknanan vacated the Trump administration’s entire nationwide Voter List Maintenance Policy, reaching even states that voluntarily …

    Read at PJ Media (opens in a new tab)
  • The Washington TimesRight

    Judge strikes down DOJ's effort to Loaded verb“cleanse”The verb implies the voter rolls are dirty and that removal is purification, which presumes the conclusion about who is on the rolls.More neutral: remove noncitizens fromDisagree with this highlight? state voter rolls of noncitizens

    The Justice Department's campaign to get ahold of state voter registration lists, run them through federal databases to identify noncitizens, then Loaded verb“prod the states to boot”The verbs suggest pressure and forced expulsion, where the reported facts describe a federal request that states act on lists.More neutral: ask the states to removeDisagree with this highlight? those people from their rolls is illegal, a federal judge ruled Friday.

    Read at The Washington Times (opens in a new tab)

Articles you open from here build My Mix, a private picture of how your reading spreads across the spectrum, kept on this device. What is My Mix?

The left is Far Left and Left together. The right is Right and Far Right together. Every outlet keeps its own five-point rating.

Who reported it when

How the coverage built up

  • Left

    First to report

    Bloomberg, Oct 9, 2:27 PM EDT

  • Center

    3 hr 19 min later

    Its first report, Oct 9, 5:46 PM EDT

  • Right

    2 hr later

    Its first report, Oct 9, 4:28 PM EDT

See the order the outlets reported inHide the order
  1. BloombergLeftOct 9, 2:27 PM EDT
  2. The GuardianLeftOct 9, 3:19 PM EDT
  3. The Washington TimesRightOct 9, 4:28 PM EDT
  4. Al Jazeera EnglishLeftOct 9, 5:29 PM EDT
  5. Straight Arrow NewsCenterOct 9, 5:46 PM EDT
  6. The Washington PostLeftOct 9, 5:47 PM EDT
  7. PJ MediaFar RightOct 9, 5:55 PM EDT
  8. CBS NewsLeftOct 9, 6:46 PM EDT
  9. New York PostRightOct 9, 9:15 PM EDT
  10. The HillCenterOct 9, 11:13 PM EDT
  11. TheGrioLeftOct 10, 2:49 PM EDT

Times are the ones the outlets published in their own feeds, in Eastern time. Opinion is left out.

Read next

Help someone else find the truth beneath the surface

Most people see one side of a story. Share this one, so they can see how every side is telling it and decide for themselves.

Email it

Seen a mistake? Tell us what is wrong with this page