Skip to content

Crime & JusticeDeveloping

Justice Department investigates five TV networks over suspended White House pool coverage

By

Coverage spectrum

Covered by 26 outlets across the spectrum.

32 articles in total, 2 of them opinion. The spectrum counts each outlet once and leaves opinion out. How we measure bias

Empty White House briefing room with rows of seats facing a podium and seal.
Image via The New York TimesHow images are chosenReport this image

The Justice Department is investigating whether five television networks broke antitrust law when they suspended White House pool coverage of President Trump last month. ABC, CBS, CNN, Fox News and NBC were told on Friday that the department was looking into the suspension, and federal officials requested communications and materials from them. The suspension followed the White House's decision to restrict access for CNN, MS NOW and Politico. The outlets report that the networks briefly stopped providing pooled coverage of Trump's appearances. Coverage reports no finding or charges so far.

Headline and summary written by Mantle’s AI from the coverage below, under published rules. How this works

What happened

Key points

Each point shows who reports it, from Far Left to Far Right.

  1. The Justice Department is investigating whether five TV networks violated antitrust law by suspending White House pool coverage of Trump.

    Across the spectrumReported byLeft4Center4Right2Far Right2See the outletsHide the outlets
    Left
    The New York Times, Bloomberg, The Washington Post, CBS News
    Center
    BBC News, Newsweek, Deutsche Welle, Financial Times
    Right
    Washington Examiner, Daily Mail
    Far Right
    Just the News, The Western Journal
  2. The networks under investigation are ABC, CBS, CNN, Fox News and NBC.

    Reported byLeft1Center2Right2Far Right1See the outletsHide the outlets
    Left
    The Washington Post
    Center
    Deutsche Welle, Financial Times
    Right
    Washington Examiner, Daily Mail
    Far Right
    The Western Journal
  3. The White House restricted access for CNN, MS NOW and Politico before the suspension.

    Reported byLeft1Center1Far Right2See the outletsHide the outlets
    Left
    CBS News
    Center
    BBC News
    Far Right
    Just the News, The Western Journal
  4. The networks were notified on Friday, and federal officials sought communications and materials from them.

    Reported byLeft1Right1Far Right1See the outletsHide the outlets
    Left
    The New York Times
    Right
    Washington Examiner
    Far Right
    The Western Journal
  5. A Justice Department representative said the networks proudly boycotted covering White House events.

    One outletThe Western Journal· Far Right

What is contested

Where accounts differ

Points the coverage does not agree on, and who says what.

  • The five networks coordinated a boycott of White House pool coverage.

    A Justice Department representative said the networks proudly boycotted covering White House events; the Western Journal describes the suspension as a moment of media solidarity; CBS News and the Washington Examiner describe it as a brief suspension of the pool.

How each side tells it

Compare views

Every side reports that the Justice Department is investigating five TV networks over their suspension of White House pool coverage. Left and center headlines state the probe, while right headlines name the networks and the Far Right says the networks refused pool coverage.

  • the left

    12 outlets

    Left headlines report the Justice Department probing five networks, several linking it to the White House ban on three news organizations, with the Post's description calling the probe a sharp escalation.

    DOJ investigating TV networks over suspension of press pool after Trump media ban
    CBS NewsLeftAll left-leaning headlines
  • the center

    7 outlets

    Center headlines state the probe plainly, though Deutsche Welle calls the suspension a boycott and Newsweek's headline is an explainer on the antitrust law.

    US justice department investigates TV networks over Trump pool coverage
    BBC NewsCenterAll center headlines
  • the right

    7 outlets · 2 opinion

    Right headlines name the networks under investigation, and the Far Right Western Journal leads with Fox News and CNN, while the Washington Examiner stresses the suspension was brief.

    Justice Department investigating TV networks that briefly suspended Trump press pool coverage
    Washington ExaminerRightAll right-leaning headlines

The words they chose

Language to notice

Words that carry a judgement beyond the facts. Tap a highlighted word anywhere on the page to see why.

  • Left11

    sharp escalationperceived enemies in the pressnews outlets he doesn’t likeextraordinary turn

  • Center2

    refused to coverantitrust threat

  • Right9

    refusing pool coveragecoordinated suspensionUh-OhFreezing Out

In the outlets’ own words

  • Loaded verb

    refusing pool coverageMore neutral: suspending pool coverage

    Refusing implies a choice to withhold coverage, while the description says the broadcasters moved to stop pool coverage.

    DOJ investigating whether media outlets violated antitrust law after refusing pool coverage

    Used byJust the News (Far Right)

  • Sensational language

    sharp escalationMore neutral: a new step

    The word sharp adds drama to a characterization of the probe that the coverage does not establish as fact.

    The antitrust probe of the outlets — Fox News, CNN, ABC, CBS and NBC — marks a sharp escalation in the Trump administration’s use of its powers against perceived enemies in the…

    Used byThe Washington Post (Left)

  • Delegitimizing label

    perceived enemies in the pressMore neutral: news organizations it has criticized

    The phrase presents the administration’s treatment of news organizations as hostility in the outlet’s own voice, without attributing that view to anyone.

    …sharp escalation in the Trump administration’s use of its powers against perceived enemies in the press.

    Used byThe Washington Post (Left)

  • Loaded modifier

    news outlets he doesn’t likeMore neutral: three news organizations

    The phrase attributes a personal motive to the White House decision rather than describing the outlets.

    President Donald Trump’s attempt to ban news outlets he doesn’t like has taken another extraordinary turn: the Justice Department is now…

    Used byThe Daily Beast (Far Left)

Show 18 more phrasesShow fewer
  • Sensational language

    extraordinary turnMore neutral: new development

    The adjective adds drama that the facts reported do not require.

    …Donald Trump’s attempt to ban news outlets he doesn’t like has taken another extraordinary turn: the Justice Department is now reportedly investigating the television networks…

    Used byThe Daily Beast (Far Left)

  • Sensational language

    CrackpotMore neutral: Trump’s media ban

    The word is a label of contempt that judges the media ban before the facts are weighed.

    Trump’s Crackpot Media Ban Takes Wild New Turn

    Used byThe Daily Beast (Far Left)

  • Sensational language

    Wild New TurnMore neutral: new development

    The phrase manufactures drama about a development that the reporting describes in plain terms.

    Trump’s Crackpot Media Ban Takes Wild New Turn

    Used byThe Daily Beast (Far Left)

  • Loaded verb

    refused to coverMore neutral: stopped covering

    Refused implies a deliberate defiance that other outlets do not state; the networks are described as suspending or pulling coverage.

    ABC News, CBS News, CNN, Fox News and NBC News refused to cover the president’s activities after last month’s White House ban

    Used byFinancial Times (Center)

  • Absolutist framing

    coordinated suspensionMore neutral: joint suspension

    The description states as fact that the networks coordinated, which is the question the Justice Department is investigating.

    …an antitrust investigation into Fox News, CNN, NBC, ABC and CBS over their coordinated suspension of White House television pool coverage.

    Used byDaily Mail (Right)

  • Loaded verb

    escalates Trump's fight with the pressMore neutral: The move comes amid a court dispute over barring CNN, Politico and MS NOW from the White House.

    Presents the probe as part of a personal conflict and an escalation, which the antitrust announcement itself does not state.

    The move escalates Trump's fight with the press amid court battle over barring CNN, Politico and MS NOW from the White…

    Used byNPR (Left)

  • Loaded verb

    pressuresMore neutral: urges

    “Pressures” implies coercion, where the reported statement is only a call to elect a new leader.

    And, President Trump pressures Ukrainians to elect a new leader.

    Used byNPR (Left)

  • Sensational language

    Uh-OhMore neutral: omit

    The exclamation adds mock alarm to a legal question that the coverage describes as an investigation.

    Uh-Oh: Freezing Out Trump May Have Just Landed These Five Networks in Legal Hot Water

    Used byRedState (Far Right)

  • Loaded verb

    Freezing OutMore neutral: Suspending coverage of

    “Freezing out” casts the networks’ joint pool suspension as hostility toward Trump, where the neutral term is a suspension or boycott.

    Uh-Oh: Freezing Out Trump May Have Just Landed These Five Networks in Legal Hot Water

    Used byRedState (Far Right)

  • Sensational language

    bullyingMore neutral: investigation

    Calls the probe bullying as a conclusion, not a finding; the investigation’s aims are not established in the article.

    The antitrust investigation adds another layer of bullying to Trump's vendetta against "Fake News Media Outlets."

    Used byReason (Right)

  • Loaded modifier

    vendettaMore neutral: dispute with

    Attributes a personal motive to the president as settled fact.

    The antitrust investigation adds another layer of bullying to Trump's vendetta against "Fake News Media Outlets."

    Used byReason (Right)

  • Loaded modifier

    show of solidarityMore neutral: joint suspension

    Frames the joint suspension as principled solidarity, which the reporting does not establish.

    …which last Friday demanded network communications regarding the TV pool, that show of solidarity may have violated the Sherman Antitrust Act.

    Used byReason (Right)

  • Sensational language

    antitrust threatMore neutral: antitrust investigation

    “Threat” presents the investigation as intimidation before any finding; the department described it as an antitrust review.

    Trump’s antitrust threat to NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN and Fox News: What to know

    Used byThe Hill (Center)

  • Loaded verb

    rebelledMore neutral: suspended coverage

    “Rebelled” casts the networks’ suspension as defiance, where the same action is described elsewhere as a suspension or boycott.

    Five news outlets rebelled against the White House after President Donald Trump banned three outlets for what he…

    Used byTheBlaze (Far Right)

  • Loaded verb

    claimingMore neutral: saying

    “Claiming” casts doubt on the department’s stated investigation of possible violations, where “saying” reports it neutrally.

    …The Justice Department is now investigating ABC, CBS, CNN, NBC and Fox News, claiming they violated antitrust laws when they temporarily suspended coverage of President…

    Used byHuffPost (Far Left)

  • Vague attribution

    Experts SayMore neutral: A law professor says

    The headline attributes the view to experts, while the article quotes one law professor; a single named source is more precise.

    Experts Say Trump’s Antitrust Probe Of 5 TV Networks Reeks Of Retaliation

    Used byHuffPost (Far Left)

  • Loaded verb

    Reeks Of RetaliationMore neutral: Is Seen as Retaliation

    Asserts the probe is retaliation through a metaphor, where the cited evidence is one expert’s opinion.

    Experts Say Trump’s Antitrust Probe Of 5 TV Networks Reeks Of Retaliation

    Used byHuffPost (Far Left)

  • Loaded verb

    put CNN, Politico, and MSNOW in time outMore neutral: barred CNN, Politico and MS NOW from the White House

    The phrase presents a government ban on news outlets from the White House as a child's punishment, which adds judgement the facts do not carry.

    …the time, ruled that pool coverage would not take place after Trump put CNN, Politico, and MSNOW in time out and banned them from the White House.

    Used byThe Western Journal (Far Right)

Words quoted from someone else (2)Hide the quoted words

Loaded words that outlets reported someone else saying. They show what was said, not how the outlet chose to say it.

  • Delegitimizing label

    Quoted

    fake newsMore neutral: reporting he disputes

    Presents the press as producing fake news, a characterization the coverage attributes to Trump rather than establishing.

    …MS NOW, and Politico from the grounds of the White House for repeatedly pushing "fake news" about him and his administration.

    Quoted byRedState (Far Right)Reason (Right)TheBlaze (Far Right)

    These are Donald Trump’s words. The outlets are reporting them.

  • Loaded verb

    Quoted

    claimedMore neutral: said

    “Claimed” casts doubt on a statement the department made openly, where “said” reports it neutrally.

    …among commercial competitors can violate the Sherman Act’ a DOJ spokesperson claimed

    Quoted byThe Independent (Left)

    These are Department of Justice spokesperson’s words. The outlets are reporting them.

See the full language guide

See for yourself

Side by side

What each side leads with and what it leaves out. Open a side to read its headlines.

From the left

12 outlets

Leads with

  • the Justice Department investigation
  • the White House ban on news organizations
  • escalating federal power against the press

Leaves out

  • court pause of the White House ban
  • Justice Department statement that networks proudly boycotted coverage

Reported by other sides, not found in this side’s coverage.

See the 12 headlines from the leftHide the headlines
  • HuffPostFar Left

    Vague attribution“Experts Say”The headline attributes the view to experts, while the article quotes one law professor; a single named source is more precise.More neutral: A law professor saysDisagree with this highlight? Trump’s Antitrust Probe Of 5 TV Networks Loaded verb“Reeks Of Retaliation”Asserts the probe is retaliation through a metaphor, where the cited evidence is one expert’s opinion.More neutral: Is Seen as RetaliationDisagree with this highlight?

    “It’s just so obvious that they don’t like the speech-based decisions of these networks,” one law professor said of the Trump administration.

  • What’s the White House press pool?

    The Justice Department is investigating the five TV networks that make up the White House TV press pool. Here’s how the pool works.

    1 more from NBC News
  • NPRLeft

    DOJ launches antitrust probe of TV networks. And, Trump says Ukraine needs new leader

    The Justice Department is investigating several TV networks for possible antitrust violations. And, President Trump Loaded verb“pressures”“Pressures” implies coercion, where the reported statement is only a call to elect a new leader.More neutral: urgesDisagree with this highlight? Ukrainians to elect a new leader.

    1 more from NPR
  • DOJ investigating five TV networks over White House pool coverage

    ‘Group boycotts among commercial competitors can violate the Sherman Act’ a DOJ spokesperson Loaded verb“claimed”“Claimed” casts doubt on a statement the department made openly, where “said” reports it neutrally.More neutral: saidThese are Department of Justice spokesperson’s words. The outlet is reporting them.Disagree with this highlight?

  • US opens antitrust probe into TV networks halting Trump coverage

    Department of Justice says it's investigating whether the White House press pool's decision violated antitrust laws.

  • The GuardianLeftAssociated Press report

    US justice department investigating TV networks over Trump pool coverage

    Investigation launched after five broadcasters last month ceased presidential coverage after CNN, MS Now and Politico were barred from White House The US Department of Justice is investigating whether the decision of the White House television press pool to halt coverage of the …

  • Trump’s Sensational language“Crackpot”The word is a label of contempt that judges the media ban before the facts are weighed.More neutral: Trump’s media banDisagree with this highlight? Media Ban Takes Sensational language“Wild New Turn”The phrase manufactures drama about a development that the reporting describes in plain terms.More neutral: new developmentDisagree with this highlight?

    President Donald Trump’s attempt to ban Loaded modifier“news outlets he doesn’t like”The phrase attributes a personal motive to the White House decision rather than describing the outlets.More neutral: three news organizationsDisagree with this highlight? has taken another Sensational language“extraordinary turn”The adjective adds drama that the facts reported do not require.More neutral: new developmentDisagree with this highlight?: the Justice Department is now reportedly investigating the television networks that pushed back against him. …

  • ABC NewsLeftAssociated Press report

    DOJ says it's investigating whether White House TV pool's coverage halt violated antitrust law

    The U.S. Department of Justice is investigating whether the decision of the White House television press pool to halt coverage of President Donald Trump last month violated antitrust law

  • DOJ investigating TV networks over suspension of press pool after Trump media ban

    The Justice Department is investigating whether the major TV networks violated antitrust laws after they briefly suspended the TV press pool system in response to President Trump's decision to ban three news organizations from the White House.

  • DOJ investigating five TV networks over White House pool coverage

    The antitrust probe of the outlets — Fox News, CNN, ABC, CBS and NBC — marks a Sensational language“sharp escalation”The word sharp adds drama to a characterization of the probe that the coverage does not establish as fact.More neutral: a new stepDisagree with this highlight? in the Trump administration’s use of its powers against Delegitimizing label“perceived enemies in the press”The phrase presents the administration’s treatment of news organizations as hostility in the outlet’s own voice, without attributing that view to anyone.More neutral: news organizations it has criticizedDisagree with this highlight?.

  • DOJ Probes TV Networks Over White House Coverage Decisions

    The Justice Department said it is investigating five television networks that stopped providing pooled coverage of President Donald Trump’s appearances after the White House barred several news organizations from access.

  • Justice Dept. Is Investigating TV Networks Over Trump Pool Coverage

    Major TV networks were notified on Friday that the department was looking into whether they violated antitrust laws when they suspended pool coverage of President Trump.

From the center

7 outlets

Leads with

  • the antitrust question
  • the White House block on CNN, MS NOW and Politico
  • the networks' pause in pool coverage

Leaves out

  • court pause of the White House ban

Reported by other sides, not found in this side’s coverage.

See the 7 headlines from the centerHide the headlines
  • The HillCenter

    Trump’s Sensational language“antitrust threat”“Threat” presents the investigation as intimidation before any finding; the department described it as an antitrust review.More neutral: antitrust investigationDisagree with this highlight? to NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN and Fox News: What to know

    The Justice Department (DOJ) took many by surprise when it said over the weekend it would investigate the country's top television networks on antitrust grounds over a boycott they carried out last month responding to his ban of three news outlets from the White House. …

    1 more from The Hill
  • CNBCCenter

    Justice Department opens antitrust probe as White House press-access fight escalates

    The Justice Department said in a statement that it is examining whether the White House TV press pool violated the Sherman Act.

  • DOJ investigating major news networks over suspension of pool coverage

    The Department of Justice is looking into whether CBS, CNN, ABC, NBC and Fox News violated federal antitrust laws.

  • US justice department probes TV networks over Trump pool coverage

    ABC News, CBS News, CNN, Fox News and NBC News Loaded verb“refused to cover”Refused implies a deliberate defiance that other outlets do not state; the networks are described as suspending or pulling coverage.More neutral: stopped coveringDisagree with this highlight? the president’s activities after last month’s White House ban

  • US: Justice Department probes Trump's press pool boycott for antitrust violation

    The Department of Justice is investigating whether the five news organizations violated antitrust laws when they suspended their coverage of Trump in protest. The networks under probe are ABC, CBS, CNN, NBC and Fox News.

  • NewsweekCenter

    What Is the Sherman Act? Why DOJ Investigating Networks Over Trump Coverage

    DOJ is investigating whether major TV networks violated antitrust law by suspending White House pool coverage.

  • BBC NewsCenter

    US justice department investigates TV networks over Trump pool coverage

    The White House had blocked access for CNN, MS Now and Politico, leading them to restrict pool coverage.

From the right

7 outlets · 2 opinion

Leads with

  • the networks named in the probe
  • the brief suspension of pool coverage
  • the networks' refusal to cover White House events
See the 9 headlines from the rightHide the headlines
  • DOJ Investigating Fox News, CNN, Broadcast Networks for Possible Violations of Federal Law

    TV networks pictured a refusal to broadcast what President Donald Trump was doing last month as a moment of media solidarity. The Department of Justice is wondering whether it violated

  • TheBlazeFar Right

    News outlets boycotting pool report might have violated US law, Justice Department says

    The ongoing feud between the mainstream media and the Trump administration has opened up another field of battle after the Justice Department confirmed a criminal investigation. …

  • DOJ Probes 5 Major TV Networks Over Suspension of Pool Coverage

    A DOJ official said that ‘group boycotts among commercial competitors can violate the Sherman Act.’

  • DOJ Investigating Five Major News Networks for Alleged Boycott of White House Events

    The U.S. Department of Justice is investigating several major television networks for an alleged boycott of events at the White House after President Donald Trump banned CNN and other outlets.

  • Justice Department is investigating major TV networks including Fox News, CNN, NBC, ABC, and CBS, over Trump coverage boycott

    The Justice Department has launched an antitrust investigation into Fox News, CNN, NBC, ABC and CBS over their Absolutist framing“coordinated suspension”The description states as fact that the networks coordinated, which is the question the Justice Department is investigating.More neutral: joint suspensionDisagree with this highlight? of White House television pool coverage.

  • Justice Department investigating TV networks that briefly suspended Trump press pool coverage

    The Justice Department is investigating whether the major TV networks violated antitrust law last month when they briefly suspended their pool coverage of President Donald Trump after he blocked multiple news outlets from fully accessing White House grounds. …

  • Just the NewsFar Right

    DOJ investigating whether media outlets violated antitrust law after Loaded verb“refusing pool coverage”Refusing implies a choice to withhold coverage, while the description says the broadcasters moved to stop pool coverage.More neutral: suspending pool coverageDisagree with this highlight?

    The investigation follows a move last month by the five broadcasters in the White House television pool to stop pool coverage of Trump after the administration restricted CNN, MS NOW and Politico’s access to the White House.

    1 more from Just the News
  • ReasonRightOpinion

    TV Networks Protested Press Bans by Declining To Cover Trump. That Might Have Been Illegal, the DOJ Says.

    The antitrust investigation adds another layer of Sensational language“bullying”Calls the probe bullying as a conclusion, not a finding; the investigation’s aims are not established in the article.More neutral: investigationDisagree with this highlight? to Trump's Loaded modifier“vendetta”Attributes a personal motive to the president as settled fact.More neutral: dispute withDisagree with this highlight? against "Delegitimizing label“Fake News”Dismisses reporting wholesale; a false claim should be identified specifically.More neutral: inaccurate report, say what is false and how you knowThis appears inside a quotation. The outlet is reporting someone else’s words.Disagree with this highlight? Media Outlets."

  • RedStateFar RightOpinion

    Sensational language“Uh-Oh”The exclamation adds mock alarm to a legal question that the coverage describes as an investigation.More neutral: omitDisagree with this highlight?: Loaded verb“Freezing Out”“Freezing out” casts the networks’ joint pool suspension as hostility toward Trump, where the neutral term is a suspension or boycott.More neutral: Suspending coverage ofDisagree with this highlight? Trump May Have Just Landed These Five Networks in Legal Hot Water

    The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) said Saturday that it is investigating whether five major television networks violated federal antitrust law when they banded together last month and stopped providing pool coverage of President Trump. …

Articles you open from here build My Mix, a private picture of how your reading spreads across the spectrum, kept on this device. What is My Mix?

The left is Far Left and Left together. The right is Right and Far Right together. Every outlet keeps its own five-point rating.

Who reported it when

How the coverage built up

  • Left

    First to report

    The New York Times, Oct 10, 7:03 PM EDT

  • Center

    1 hr 46 min later

    Its first report, Oct 10, 8:49 PM EDT

  • Right

    5 hr 34 min later

    Its first report, Oct 11, 12:37 AM EDT

See the order the outlets reported inHide the order
  1. The New York TimesLeftOct 10, 7:03 PM EDT
  2. BloombergLeftOct 10, 8:38 PM EDT
  3. BBC NewsCenterOct 10, 8:49 PM EDT
  4. The Washington PostLeftOct 10, 8:52 PM EDT
  5. NewsweekCenterOct 10, 9:53 PM EDT
  6. CBS NewsLeftOct 10, 10:21 PM EDT
  7. NBC NewsLeftOct 10, 10:39 PM EDT
  8. ABC NewsLeftOct 10, 10:45 PM EDT
  9. The Daily BeastFar LeftOct 10, 11:11 PM EDT
  10. The GuardianLeftOct 10, 11:15 PM EDT
  11. Deutsche WelleCenterOct 10, 11:59 PM EDT
  12. Financial TimesCenterOct 11, 12:28 AM EDT
  13. Al Jazeera EnglishLeftOct 11, 12:30 AM EDT
  14. Washington ExaminerRightOct 11, 12:37 AM EDT
  15. Daily MailRightOct 11, 1:31 AM EDT
  16. The HillCenterOct 11, 7:44 AM EDT
  17. NPRLeftOct 11, 8:04 AM EDT
  18. Straight Arrow NewsCenterOct 11, 1:00 PM EDT
  19. CNBCCenterOct 11, 3:15 PM EDT
  20. Breitbart NewsFar RightOct 11, 5:07 PM EDT
  21. The IndependentLeftOct 12, 4:37 AM EDT
  22. The Epoch TimesFar RightOct 12, 9:09 AM EDT
  23. TheBlazeFar RightOct 12, 5:26 PM EDT
  24. HuffPostFar LeftOct 12, 6:50 PM EDT
  25. The Western JournalFar RightOct 12, 9:37 PM EDT

Times are the ones the outlets published in their own feeds, in Eastern time. Opinion is left out. Just the News gave only a date, so it is not placed.

Help someone else find the truth beneath the surface

Most people see one side of a story. Share this one, so they can see how every side is telling it and decide for themselves.

Email it

Seen a mistake? Tell us what is wrong with this page