Skip to content

Crime & JusticeDeveloping

Lawyers for cleared ex-Olympian David Hearn seek watchdog probes into Reflecting Pool case

By

Coverage spectrum

Covered by 9 outlets across the spectrum.

9 articles in total. The spectrum counts each outlet once and leaves opinion out. How we measure bias

Attorneys for former Olympic canoeist David Hearn have asked the inspectors general of the Justice and Interior Departments to investigate the handling of his prosecution over alleged vandalism of the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool. Hearn was indicted in July on a felony charge of destroying government property, accused of causing more than $1,000 in damage. U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro later moved to dismiss the case after determining the damage was caused by a contractor's faulty installation rather than vandalism. A D.C. Superior Court judge, Todd Edelman, permanently dismissed the indictment with prejudice last week, barring the charge from being refiled. In a letter to the watchdogs, Hearn's lawyers alleged misconduct by officials including Pirro, Interior Secretary Doug Burgum and President Trump.

Headline and summary written by Mantle’s AI from the coverage below, under published rules. How this works

What happened

Key points

Each point shows who reports it, from Far Left to Far Right.

  1. David Hearn, a former Olympic canoeist, was indicted in July on a felony charge of destroying government property related to the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool.

    Reported byLeftCenterRight

  2. Prosecutors alleged more than $1,000 in damage from pulling up part of the pool's newly installed liner.

    Reported byLeftCenter

  3. U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro moved to dismiss the case after determining the damage was caused by a contractor's faulty installation, not vandalism.

    Reported byLeftCenterRight

  4. A D.C. Superior Court judge permanently dismissed the indictment with prejudice, barring the charge from being refiled.

    Reported byLeftCenterRight

  5. Hearn's attorneys sent a letter to the inspectors general of the DOJ and Interior Department asking for investigations into the prosecution.

    Reported byLeftCenterRight

Show 2 more pointsShow fewer points
  1. The letter names President Trump, Pirro and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum as officials involved in what the attorneys call misconduct.

    Reported byLeftCenterRight

  2. The judge reportedly found a 'unique possibility' that prosecutors could try to revive the case due to political pressure from Trump.

    Reported byCenter

What is contested

Where accounts differ

Points the coverage does not agree on, and who says what.

  • Whether the prosecution of Hearn was driven by political pressure from President Trump.

    Hearn's attorneys and the dismissing judge, as cited by The Hill, say there was political pressure from Trump to prosecute suspected vandals; the Justice Department has not publicly confirmed this characterization in the supplied articles.

How each side tells it

Compare views

  • the left

    3 outlets

    Left-leaning outlets emphasize that Hearn was wrongly or falsely accused and focus on the watchdog request as a response to prosecutorial misconduct; ABC's version is an AP wire report.

    Wrongly Indicted Man Seeks Inquiry of Official Conduct in Reflecting Pool Case
    The New York TimesLeftAll left-leaning headlines
  • the center

    3 outlets

    Center outlets describe the watchdog request straightforwardly, often quoting extensively from the letter and noting the judge's dismissal with prejudice.

    Lawyers urge watchdogs to examine Reflecting Pool case against ex-Olympian
    The HillCenterAll center headlines
  • the right

    3 outlets

    Right-leaning outlets present the story factually, noting Trump's earlier accusation and the attorneys' framing of the prosecution as unjust without adopting that characterization themselves.

    Ex-Olympian’s Lawyers Call for Federal Watchdogs to Investigate Reflecting Pool Case
    The Epoch TimesFar RightAll right-leaning headlines

The words they chose

Language to notice

Words that carry a judgement beyond the facts. Tap a highlighted word anywhere on the page to see why.

  • Left1

    abruptly drop the case

  • Center0

    No loaded words in its own voice.

  • Right0

    No loaded words in its own voice.

In the outlets’ own words

  • Loaded verb

    abruptly drop the caseMore neutral: later dropped the case

    ‘Abruptly’ adds a dramatic characterization of the timing not necessary to convey the fact of dismissal.

    …with intentionally damaging the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, only to abruptly drop the case after determining that he was not responsible, are urging two different…

    Used byABC News (Left)

Words quoted from someone else (1)Hide the quoted words

Loaded words that outlets reported someone else saying. They show what was said, not how the outlet chose to say it.

  • Loaded modifier

    Quoted

    blatantly falseMore neutral: inaccurate

    The phrase is a strong accusatory characterization, though attributed to the lawyers' letter.

    …prosecutors of ignoring their own evidence to indict him and then providing “blatantly false” information about what they knew when.

    Quoted byThe New York Times (Left)

    Inside a quotation: the outlets are reporting someone else’s words.

See the full language guide

See for yourself

Side by side

What each side leads with and what it leaves out. Open a side to read its headlines.

From the left

3 outlets

Leads with

  • Hearn's wrongful indictment
  • call for watchdog investigations
  • alleged misconduct by officials
See the 3 headlines from the leftHide the headlines
  • ABC NewsLeftAssociated Press report

    Lawyers for ex-Olympian cleared in Reflecting Pool case call for government watchdog investigations

    Lawyers for a former Olympian whom the Justice Department charged with intentionally damaging the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, only to Loaded verb“abruptly drop the case”‘Abruptly’ adds a dramatic characterization of the timing not necessary to convey the fact of dismissal.More neutral: later dropped the caseDisagree with this highlight? after determining that he was not responsible, are urging two different government watchd...

  • Wrongly Indicted Man Seeks Inquiry of Official Conduct in Reflecting Pool Case

    Lawyers for the former Olympian David Hearn accused prosecutors of ignoring their own evidence to indict him and then providing “Loaded modifier“blatantly false”The phrase is a strong accusatory characterization, though attributed to the lawyers' letter.More neutral: inaccurateThis appears inside a quotation. The outlet is reporting someone else’s words.Disagree with this highlight?” information about what they knew when.

  • Olympian accused of damaging Reflecting Pool seeks probe of potential misconduct

    David Hearn is asking the Justice and Interior Dept. inspectors general to investigate his arrest and the dismissal of the case against him.

From the center

3 outlets

Leads with

  • details from the letter itself
  • judge's dismissal findings
  • specific officials named
See the 3 headlines from the centerHide the headlines
  • The HillCenter

    Lawyers urge watchdogs to examine Reflecting Pool case against ex-Olympian

    Lawyers for a former U.S. Olympian cleared of damaging the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool are asking federal watchdogs to investigate how the Justice Department built a felony case against him before prosecutors concluded he was not responsible. …

  • Ex-Olympian demands watchdog probe of DOJ, Interior Dept. over dismissed Reflecting Pool case

    Attorneys for Olympian David Hearn want a probe into the DOJ and Interior Dept. for falsely accusing him of damaging the Reflecting Pool.

  • NewsweekCenter

    Ex-Olympian Pushes Watchdog Probe After Reflecting Pool Charges Dropped

    Federal watchdogs should conduct investigations into the prosecution of former Olympian David Hearn, his attorneys said Tuesday.

From the right

3 outlets

Leads with

  • procedural history of the case
  • Trump's earlier public accusation
  • attorneys' stated goal of accountability

Leaves out

  • details of the $1,000 damage claim
  • specific contractor explanation

Reported by other sides, not found in this side’s coverage.

See the 3 headlines from the rightHide the headlines

Articles you open from here build My Mix, a private picture of how your reading spreads across the spectrum, kept on this device. What is My Mix?

The left is Far Left and Left together. The right is Right and Far Right together. Every outlet keeps its own five-point rating.

Who reported it when

How the coverage built up

  • Left

    First to report

    CBS News, Oct 6, 12:00 PM EDT

  • Center

    1 hr 26 min later

    Its first report, Oct 6, 1:25 PM EDT

  • Right

    1 hr 18 min later

    Its first report, Oct 6, 1:17 PM EDT

See the order the outlets reported inHide the order
  1. CBS NewsLeftOct 6, 12:00 PM EDT
  2. The New York TimesLeftOct 6, 12:38 PM EDT
  3. The Washington TimesRightOct 6, 1:17 PM EDT
  4. NewsweekCenterOct 6, 1:25 PM EDT
  5. Straight Arrow NewsCenterOct 6, 1:31 PM EDT
  6. ABC NewsLeftOct 6, 3:16 PM EDT
  7. The HillCenterOct 6, 3:37 PM EDT
  8. Washington ExaminerRightOct 6, 3:39 PM EDT
  9. The Epoch TimesFar RightOct 7, 10:41 AM EDT

Times are the ones the outlets published in their own feeds, in Eastern time. Opinion is left out.

Help someone else find the truth beneath the surface

Most people see one side of a story. Share this one, so they can see how every side is telling it and decide for themselves.

Email it

Seen a mistake? Tell us what is wrong with this page