Skip to content

PoliticsDeveloping

NYT report: Kushner, Witkoff talks with Russia included proposed oil deal

By

Coverage spectrum

Covered by 3 outlets, mostly left-leaning (67%).

4 articles in total. The spectrum counts each outlet once and leaves opinion out. How we measure bias

According to reporting by The New York Times, President Vladimir Putin raised the possible sale of Russian energy assets during talks with U.S. envoys Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff, who are negotiating to end the war in Ukraine. The Times reports the proposed multibillion-dollar deal would benefit Middle Eastern business figures, including brothers Moutaz and Ramez Al-Khayyat, who have business ties to Kushner. The reporting has raised questions about potential conflicts of interest involving the negotiators. Russian special envoy Kirill Dmitriev publicly defended Kushner on social media after the report drew scrutiny, calling him a “Peacemaker.” The Hill republished elements of the Times report.

Headline and summary written by Mantle’s AI from the coverage below, under published rules. How this works

What happened

Key points

Each point shows who reports it, from Far Left to Far Right.

  1. Putin raised the sale of Russian energy assets with U.S. envoys Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff during Ukraine peace talks, according to The New York Times.

    Reported byLeftCenter

  2. The proposed deal would reportedly benefit Middle Eastern business figures, including Qatar-based brothers Moutaz and Ramez Al-Khayyat, who have partnered with Kushner.

    Reported byLeftCenter

  3. The reporting has raised questions about potential conflicts of interest for the Trump administration's negotiators.

    Reported byLeftCenter

  4. Russian special envoy Kirill Dmitriev publicly defended Kushner on social media, calling him a “Peacemaker.”

    Reported byLeft

  5. The Hill's coverage is based on and credits The New York Times' original reporting.

    Reported byCenter

What is contested

Where accounts differ

Points the coverage does not agree on, and who says what.

  • Whether the proposed oil deal constitutes an improper conflict of interest.

    The New York Times and The Daily Beast present the arrangement as raising clear conflict-of-interest concerns given Kushner and Witkoff's business ties; no outlet in this set presents a rebuttal beyond the Kremlin's characterization of Kushner as a peacemaker.

How each side tells it

Compare views

  • the left

    2 outlets

    The New York Times frames the story around conflicts of interest in administration policy, while the Daily Beast, further left, emphasizes Kremlin reaction and casts the deal as a scandal being exposed.

    Kremlin Loaded verb“Rushes to Defend”Implies urgency and defensiveness beyond simply reporting that an official made a statement.More neutral: DefendsDisagree with this highlight? Jared Kushner as Loaded modifier“Murky Deal Is Exposed”Presents the deal's questionable nature and the act of exposure as settled fact rather than attributed reporting.More neutral: Deal Is ReportedDisagree with this highlight?
    The Daily BeastFar LeftAll left-leaning headlines

  • the center

    1 outlet

    The Hill presents the story as a republished report, attributing the claims directly to The New York Times without added characterization.

    US, Russia talks on Ukraine involve oil deal tied to Kushner, Witkoff: Report
    The HillCenterAll center headlines

  • the right

    No coverage yet

    No right-leaning outlet that Mantle follows has covered this story yet. That absence is part of the picture.

The words they chose

Language to notice

Words that carry a judgement beyond the facts. Tap a highlighted word anywhere on the page to see why.

  • Left4

    striking even for an administration that regularly mixes personal business interests with foreign policypotentially murky dealingsRushes to DefendMurky Deal Is Exposed

  • Center0

    No loaded words in its own voice.

  • Right

    Has not covered this story.

In the outlets’ own words

  • Sensational language

    striking even for an administration that regularly mixes personal business interests with foreign policyMore neutral: notable given other instances in which the administration's business interests have intersected with its foreign policy

    Presents a contested characterization of the administration's conduct as an established pattern rather than an allegation.

    …purchase of Russian energy assets is striking even for an administration that regularly mixes personal business interests with foreign policy.

    Used byThe New York Times (Left)

  • Loaded modifier

    potentially murky dealingsMore neutral: business arrangement under scrutiny

    Characterizes the business arrangement as suspicious without attribution to a specific finding.

    A top Russian official defended Jared Kushner after suggestions of potentially murky dealings in negotiations to end Putin’s war in Ukraine.

    Used byThe Daily Beast (Far Left)

  • Loaded verb

    Rushes to DefendMore neutral: Defends

    Implies urgency and defensiveness beyond simply reporting that an official made a statement.

    Kremlin Rushes to Defend Jared Kushner as Murky Deal Is Exposed

    Used byThe Daily Beast (Far Left)

  • Loaded modifier

    Murky Deal Is ExposedMore neutral: Deal Is Reported

    Presents the deal's questionable nature and the act of exposure as settled fact rather than attributed reporting.

    Kremlin Rushes to Defend Jared Kushner as Murky Deal Is Exposed

    Used byThe Daily Beast (Far Left)

See the full language guide

See for yourself

Side by side

What each side leads with and what it leaves out. Open a side to read its headlines.

From the left

2 outlets

Leads with

  • conflict of interest concerns
  • administration's mixing of business and foreign policy
  • Kremlin's defense of Kushner
See the 2 headlines from the leftHide the headlines
  • The Daily BeastFar Left

    Kremlin Loaded verb“Rushes to Defend”Implies urgency and defensiveness beyond simply reporting that an official made a statement.More neutral: DefendsDisagree with this highlight? Jared Kushner as Loaded modifier“Murky Deal Is Exposed”Presents the deal's questionable nature and the act of exposure as settled fact rather than attributed reporting.More neutral: Deal Is ReportedDisagree with this highlight?

    A top Russian official defended Jared Kushner after suggestions of potentially murky dealings in negotiations to end Putin’s war in Ukraine. Kushner and Steve Witkoff, the U.S. …

    Read at The Daily Beast (opens in a new tab)
  • The New York TimesLeft

    Trump, Putin, Ukraine and an Oil Deal: 5 Takeaways

    A proposal to bolster relations with the Kremlin through the purchase of Russian energy assets is Sensational language“striking even for an administration that regularly mixes personal business interests with foreign policy”Presents a contested characterization of the administration's conduct as an established pattern rather than an allegation.More neutral: notable given other instances in which the administration's business interests have intersected with its foreign policyDisagree with this highlight?.

    Read at The New York Times (opens in a new tab)
    1 more from The New York Times

From the center

1 outlet

Leads with

  • attribution to original NYT report
  • basic facts of the deal's existence

Leaves out

  • Kremlin spokesperson's defense of Kushner

Reported by other sides, not found in this side’s coverage.

See the headline from the centerHide the headlines
  • The HillCenter

    US, Russia talks on Ukraine involve oil deal tied to Kushner, Witkoff: Report

    The Trump administration’s ongoing discussions with Russia to end the Ukraine war now include a multibillion-dollar oil deal that would benefit Middle Eastern business executives tied to the lead U.S. negotiators, according to new reporting from The New York Times. U.S. …

    Read at The Hill (opens in a new tab)

From the right

0 outlets

No right-leaning outlet that Mantle follows has covered this story yet. That absence is part of the picture.

Articles you open from here build My Mix, a private picture of how your reading spreads across the spectrum, kept on this device. What is My Mix?

The left is Far Left and Left together. The right is Right and Far Right together. Every outlet keeps its own five-point rating.

Who reported it when

How the coverage built up

  • Left

    First to report

    The New York Times, Oct 3, 5:02 AM EDT

  • Center

    3 hr 9 min later

    Its first report, Oct 3, 8:11 AM EDT

  • Right

    No report yet

    From the outlets Mantle follows

See the order the outlets reported inHide the order
  1. The New York TimesLeftOct 3, 5:02 AM EDT
  2. The HillCenterOct 3, 8:11 AM EDT
  3. The Daily BeastFar LeftOct 4, 1:29 AM EDT

Times are the ones the outlets published in their own feeds, in Eastern time. Opinion is left out.

Read next

Help someone else find the truth beneath the surface

Most people see one side of a story. Share this one, so they can see how every side is telling it and decide for themselves.

Email it

Seen a mistake? Tell us what is wrong with this page