Skip to content

ScienceBreaking

Scientists sue to block Trump administration’s changes at National Science Foundation

By

Coverage spectrum

Covered by 3 outlets, all left-leaning.

4 articles in total. The spectrum counts each outlet once and leaves opinion out. How we measure bias

Pedestrians walk toward the entrance of a glass-and-stone federal office building with trees.
Image via The Boston GlobeHow images are chosenReport this image

The Boston Globe, Raw Story and The New York Times report that scientists and scientific societies sued the National Science Foundation on Monday in federal court in Massachusetts to block the agency from dismantling its Directorate for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences. The lawsuit says the directorate provides nearly two-thirds of federal funding for basic academic research in those fields and that closing it would devastate them. The outlets say the NSF announced in April that it would eliminate the directorate in fiscal year 2027. An NSF spokesperson told the Globe the directorate “has not been shut down” and that the agency is planning how to carry out the president’s agenda.

Headline and summary written by Mantle’s AI from the coverage below, under published rules. Editors read every story. How this works

What happened

Key points

Each point shows who reports it, from Far Left to Far Right.

  1. Scientists and scientific societies sued the NSF on Monday to block changes to its social science directorate.

    One side only: the leftReported byFar Left2Left1See the outletsHide the outlets
    Far Left
    The Boston Globe, Raw Story
    Left
    The New York Times
  2. The directorate provides nearly two-thirds of federal funding for basic academic research in these fields, according to the lawsuit.

    One side only: the leftReported byFar Left2See the outletsHide the outlets
    Far Left
    The Boston Globe, Raw Story
  3. The NSF announced in April it would eliminate the directorate in fiscal year 2027, court records show.

    One outletThe Boston Globe· Far Left

  4. An NSF spokesperson said the directorate “has not been shut down” but that the agency is planning changes.

    One outletThe Boston Globe· Far Left

  5. The lawsuit argues NSF must consult the National Science Board before closing the directorate and has given no explanation.

    One outletThe Boston Globe· Far Left

What is contested

Where accounts differ

Questions the coverage answers differently, and who says what.

  • Has the NSF shut down its social science directorate?

    An NSF spokesperson says the directorate “has not been shut down” and that the agency is planning changes. The lawsuit and the Raw Story report describe the agency as shutting the entity down.

How each side tells it

Compare views

Left-side outlets report that scientists sued the NSF in Boston to block the dismantling of its social science directorate, with the Globe and Raw Story using sharper language such as ‘dismantling’ and ‘crushing blow’ than the New York Times’ ‘changes’.

  • the left

    3 outlets

    Headlines frame the suit around the administration: Far Left outlets use ‘dismantling’, ‘so-called woke’ and ‘crushing blow’, while the Left New York Times uses the neutral ‘changes’.

    Scientists sue in Boston to block Trump administration’s dismantling of Delegitimizing label“so-called ‘woke’”The label ‘so-called woke’ attaches a contested characterization to the directorate in the outlet’s own headline without attribution.More neutral: the social science directorateDisagree with this highlight? social sciences
    The Boston GlobeFar LeftAll left-leaning headlines
  • the center

    No coverage yet

    No center outlet that Mantle follows has covered this story yet. That absence is part of the picture.

  • the right

    No coverage yet

    No right-leaning outlet that Mantle follows has covered this story yet. That absence is part of the picture.

The words they chose

Language to notice

Words that carry a judgement beyond the facts. Tap a highlighted word anywhere on the page to see why.

  • Left2

    shutting downso-called ‘woke’

  • Center

    Has not covered this story.

  • Right

    Has not covered this story.

In the outlets’ own words

  • Absolutist framing

    shutting downMore neutral: moving to eliminate

    The description states as settled fact that the entity is being shut down, while the NSF says the directorate has not been shut down.

    …Donald Trump’s administration in the District of Massachusetts on Monday for shutting down the entity that provides nearly two-thirds of federal funding for basic academic…

    Used byRaw Story (Far Left)

  • Delegitimizing label

    so-called ‘woke’More neutral: the social science directorate

    The label ‘so-called woke’ attaches a contested characterization to the directorate in the outlet’s own headline without attribution.

    Scientists sue in Boston to block Trump administration’s dismantling of so-called ‘woke’ social sciences

    Used byThe Boston Globe (Far Left)

Words quoted from someone else (1)Hide the quoted words

Loaded words that outlets reported someone else saying. They show what was said, not how the outlet chose to say it.

  • Sensational language

    Quoted

    crushing blowMore neutral: a significant setback

    The phrase is a dramatic characterization of the funding cut, and it is attributed to an advocacy group’s executive director rather than stated as fact.

    Trump admin sued over 'crushing blow' to science: 'Disservice to the American public'

    Quoted byRaw Story (Far Left)

    These are Juliane Baron’s words. The outlets are reporting them.

See the full language guide

See for yourself

Side by side

What each side leads with and what it leaves out. Open a side to read its headlines.

From the left

3 outlets

Leads with

  • the loss of federal research funding
  • harm to social and behavioral science
  • the lawsuit’s claim that NSF skipped required consultation
See the 4 headlines from the leftHide the headlines
  • Scientists sue in Boston to block Trump administration’s dismantling of Delegitimizing label“so-called ‘woke’”The label ‘so-called woke’ attaches a contested characterization to the directorate in the outlet’s own headline without attribution.More neutral: the social science directorateDisagree with this highlight? social sciences

    The directorate provides nearly two thirds of federal funding for basic and academic research in the social, behavioral, and economic sciences in the United states, the suit said. …

  • Raw StoryFar LeftCommon Dreams report

    Trump admin sued over 'Sensational language“crushing blow”The phrase is a dramatic characterization of the funding cut, and it is attributed to an advocacy group’s executive director rather than stated as fact.More neutral: a significant setbackThese are Juliane Baron’s words. The outlet is reporting them.Disagree with this highlight?' to science: 'Disservice to the American public'

    Some scientists and scientific societies sued President Donald Trump’s administration in the District of Massachusetts on Monday for Absolutist framing“shutting down”The description states as settled fact that the entity is being shut down, while the NSF says the directorate has not been shut down.More neutral: moving to eliminateDisagree with this highlight? the entity that provides nearly two-thirds of federal funding for basic academic research in the social, behavioral, and economic …

  • Scientists sue in Boston to block Trump administration changes at National Science Foundation

    WASHINGTON -- American researchers and advocacy groups sued the National Science Foundation on Monday to halt the erosion of government funding for social sciences. The lawsuit, filed in U.S. …

  • Scientists Sue to Block Trump Administration Changes at National Science Foundation

    Researchers say the administration’s actions would “devastate” social science.

From the center

0 outlets

No center outlet that Mantle follows has covered this story yet. That absence is part of the picture.

From the right

0 outlets

No right-leaning outlet that Mantle follows has covered this story yet. That absence is part of the picture.

The stories you read build My Mix, a private picture of which sides cover the stories you choose, kept on this device. What is My Mix?

The left is Far Left and Left together. The right is Right and Far Right together. Every outlet keeps its own five-point rating.

Who reported it when

How the coverage built up

  • Left

    First to report

    The New York Times, Nov 9, 4:07 PM EST

  • Center

    No report yet

    From the outlets Mantle follows

  • Right

    No report yet

    From the outlets Mantle follows

See the order the outlets reported inHide the order
  1. The New York TimesLeftNov 9, 4:07 PM EST
  2. The Boston GlobeFar LeftNov 9, 6:19 PM EST
  3. Raw StoryFar LeftNov 9, 6:21 PM EST

Times are the ones the outlets published in their own feeds, in Eastern time. Opinion is left out.

Help someone else find the truth beneath the surface

Most people see one side of a story. Share this one, so they can see how every side is telling it and decide for themselves.

Email it
Embed

Show this story’s coverage card on your own site, blog or class page. It has the headline, who is covering it and a link back here, and it tracks nobody. See the card

Seen a mistake? Tell us what is wrong with this page