Skip to content

Government & PolicyBreaking

Supreme Court agrees to hear challenge to Maryland middle school magnet admissions

By

Coverage spectrum

Covered by 16 outlets across the spectrum.

21 articles in total, 2 of them opinion. The spectrum counts each outlet once and leaves opinion out. How we measure bias

White marble Supreme Court building with columns, fountain, and a distant guard on a sunny day.
Image via The Washington TimesHow images are chosenReport this image

The US Supreme Court said Monday that it will hear a challenge to admissions for selective magnet programs at middle schools in Montgomery County, Maryland. The parents who brought the case, organized as the Association for Education Fairness, say the county's selection process discriminates against Asian American students. The county says its process is race-neutral and says it changed the system for the 2021–22 school year, moving from test scores and grades to a lottery stage. The case is the court's next test of race in school admissions since its 2023 decision ending affirmative action in higher education, and it leaves open how far school districts may go to promote diversity.

Headline and summary written by Mantle’s AI from the coverage below, under published rules. How this works

What happened

Key points

Each point shows who reports it, from Far Left to Far Right.

  1. The US Supreme Court agreed on Monday to hear a challenge to admissions for selective middle school programs in Montgomery County, Maryland.

    Reported byLeft6Center1Right2Far Right3See the outletsHide the outlets
    Left
    Bloomberg, NBC News, The New York Times, Los Angeles Times, ABC News, Al Jazeera English
    Center
    The Hill
    Right
    The Washington Times, Reason
    Far Right
    Just the News, The Daily Signal, The Epoch Times

  2. The case follows the Supreme Court’s 2023 decision ending affirmative action in higher education admissions.

    Reported byLeft1Center1Right1Far Right1See the outletsHide the outlets
    Left
    The New York Times
    Center
    The Hill
    Right
    Reason
    Far Right
    The Daily Signal

  3. Parents who brought the case say the county’s magnet selection process disadvantages Asian American students.

    Reported byLeft2Right1Far Right1See the outletsHide the outlets
    Left
    Los Angeles Times, Al Jazeera English
    Right
    Reason
    Far Right
    The Epoch Times

  4. The county says its selection process is race-neutral and that it changed the process for the 2021–22 school year, replacing test-score and grade screening with a lottery stage.

    One outletReason· Right

What is contested

Where accounts differ

Points the coverage does not agree on, and who says what.

  • Montgomery County’s magnet school selection process discriminates against Asian American students.

    Parents in the Association for Education Fairness case say the process disadvantages Asian American students; the county says its process is race-neutral and was changed for the 2021–22 school year.

How each side tells it

Compare views

Every side reports that the Supreme Court agreed Monday to hear a challenge to Montgomery County, Maryland, middle school magnet admissions. Left and center headlines present a new case on race and school admissions after the 2023 affirmative action ruling, while right headlines stress race-based admissions and the claim that Asian American students were disadvantaged.

  • the left

    6 outlets · 1 opinion

    Headlines report a new Supreme Court case on race and school admissions, often linking it to the affirmative action ruling; the Los Angeles Times instead frames it as a possible ruling against policies that limit Asian students.

    Supreme Court to Hear New Case on Race and School Admissions
    The New York TimesLeftAll left-leaning headlines

  • the center

    1 outlet

    Headline reports that the Supreme Court takes up a new case on race and school admissions, without describing the parents’ claim.

    Supreme Court takes up new case over race and school admissions
    The HillCenterAll center headlines

  • the right

    9 outlets

    Headlines describe the Supreme Court taking up race-based admissions, with the Daily Signal and Epoch Times stressing a major battle or a claim that Asian American students were disadvantaged; Reason frames it as accusations.

    Supreme Court Takes Up Sensational language“Major New Battle”Calling a court case a battle adds drama that the announcement itself does not state.More neutral: New CaseDisagree with this highlight? Over Race in School Admissions
    The Daily SignalFar RightAll right-leaning headlines

The words they chose

Language to notice

Words that carry a judgement beyond the facts. Tap a highlighted word anywhere on the page to see why.

  • Left3

    mediocre white folkstakes aim atComing for

  • Center0

    No loaded words in its own voice.

  • Right5

    Major New Battleanti-Asian discriminationadopted for the purpose of reducingDiscrimination Against Asian Students

In the outlets’ own words

  • Hateful rhetoric

    mediocre white folksMore neutral: white opponents of the policy

    The phrase describes white people as inferior as a group because of their race, and no neutral description of the case requires it.

    Attacks or dehumanizes a person or a group because of who they are: their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation or disability.

    One might think that mediocre white folks and the minority of AAPI parents who have decided to join forces with them…

    Used byThe Nation (Far Left)

  • Sensational language

    Major New BattleMore neutral: New Case

    Calling a court case a battle adds drama that the announcement itself does not state.

    Supreme Court Takes Up Major New Battle Over Race in School Admissions

    Used byThe Daily Signal (Far Right)

  • Absolutist framing

    anti-Asian discriminationMore neutral: alleged discrimination against Asian applicants

    The description presents the existence of discrimination as settled rather than as the claim of the plaintiffs.

    The case arises as both right and left favor various forms of anti-Asian discrimination.

    Used byReason (Right)

  • Absolutist framing

    adopted for the purpose of reducingMore neutral: that plaintiffs argue was intended to reduce

    The excerpt states a contested reading of the policy's purpose as what the evidence shows, in the outlet's own voice.

    But evidence indicates they were likely adopted for the purpose of reducing the percentage of Asian students in entering classes.

    Used byReason (Right)

Show 4 more phrasesShow fewer

  • Absolutist framing

    Discrimination Against Asian StudentsMore neutral: Claims of Discrimination Against Asian Students

    The headline states a contested claim as established fact in the outlet's own voice.

    Supreme Court Will Hear Case on "Facially Neutral" Discrimination Against Asian Students in Admissions to Public Magnet Schools

    Used byReason (Right)

  • Loaded modifier

    covert demographic quotasMore neutral: race-based admissions criteria

    The outlet states as fact that the district uses hidden quotas, a contested accusation that the parents’ claim and the district’s position dispute.

    …(SCOTUS) has agreed to decide whether K–12 public school districts can use covert demographic quotas to restrict access to elite middle and high schools.

    Used byOne America News (Far Right)

  • Loaded verb

    takes aim atMore neutral: concerns

    The phrase presents the case as an attack on diversity efforts, while the case itself concerns whether the policy discriminates.

    Elie Mystal The high court has just accepted a case that takes aim at efforts to increase diversity at high-performing public schools.

    Used byThe Nation (Far Left)

  • Loaded verb

    Coming forMore neutral: agrees to hear

    The idiom casts the court as hostile to a policy in the voice of a headline, where a neutral report would say it agreed to hear a case.

    The Supreme Court Is Coming for Affirmative Action—Again

    Used byThe Nation (Far Left)

See the full language guide

See for yourself

Side by side

What each side leads with and what it leaves out. Open a side to read its headlines.

From the left

6 outlets · 1 opinion

Leads with

  • new case on race and school admissions
  • link to the affirmative action ruling
  • drop in Asian student enrollment
See the 7 headlines from the leftHide the headlines
  • Al Jazeera EnglishLeft

    US Supreme Court to hear case on race in school admissions

    A group of parents claims local admission policy boosts Black and Latino students while constraining Asian applicants.

    Read at Al Jazeera English (opens in a new tab)
  • ABC NewsLeftAssociated Press report

    Supreme Court to hear case on race in middle school admissions

    The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case about race in middle school admissions

    Read at ABC News (opens in a new tab)
  • Los Angeles TimesLeft

    Supreme Court may strike down school policies that limit Asian students

    The court agreed to hear an appeal from parents in Montgomery County, Md., who were upset by a sharp drop in Asian students at its four magnet schools for gifted students.

    Read at Los Angeles Times (opens in a new tab)
  • The New York TimesLeft

    Supreme Court to Hear New Case on Race and School Admissions

    The court’s decision to review an admissions policy for selective middle school programs in Maryland follows its rejection of affirmative action in higher education.

    Read at The New York Times (opens in a new tab)
  • NBC NewsLeft

    Supreme Court to hear a new case on race and school admissions, this time in Maryland

    The Supreme Court agreed to hear a new challenge to school admissions policies on diversity, taking up a case on magnet programs in Montgomery County, Maryland.

    Read at NBC News (opens in a new tab)
  • BloombergLeft

    Supreme Court to Hear Claim of Bias in School Admissions Policy

    The US Supreme Court agreed to consider making it easier to challenge public school admissions policies as racially discriminatory in a fresh test of educational diversity efforts.

    Read at Bloomberg (opens in a new tab)
  • The NationFar LeftOpinion

    The Supreme Court Is Loaded verb“Coming for”The idiom casts the court as hostile to a policy in the voice of a headline, where a neutral report would say it agreed to hear a case.More neutral: agrees to hearDisagree with this highlight? Affirmative Action—Again

    Elie Mystal The high court has just accepted a case that Loaded verb“takes aim at”The phrase presents the case as an attack on diversity efforts, while the case itself concerns whether the policy discriminates.More neutral: concernsDisagree with this highlight? efforts to increase diversity at high-performing public schools.

    Read at The Nation (opens in a new tab)

From the center

1 outlet

Leads with

  • new case on race and school admissions
  • test of the 2023 affirmative action decision
  • open questions for school districts on diversity
See the headline from the centerHide the headlines
  • The HillCenter

    Supreme Court takes up new case over race and school admissions

    The Supreme Court will hear a challenge to admissions policies at a suburban Maryland county’s competitive middle school, the justices announced Monday. It’s a key test of the court’s 2023 decision invalidating affirmative action in higher education admissions. …

    Read at The Hill (opens in a new tab)

From the right

9 outlets

Leads with

  • race-based admissions
  • claims that Asian American students were disadvantaged
  • follows the affirmative action ruling
See the 9 headlines from the rightHide the headlines

Articles you open from here build My Mix, a private picture of how your reading spreads across the spectrum, kept on this device. What is My Mix?

The left is Far Left and Left together. The right is Right and Far Right together. Every outlet keeps its own five-point rating.

Who reported it when

How the coverage built up

  • Left

    First to report

    Bloomberg, Oct 19, 9:34 AM EDT

  • Center

    1 hr 15 min later

    Its first report, Oct 19, 10:49 AM EDT

  • Right

    18 min later

    Its first report, Oct 19, 9:52 AM EDT

See the order the outlets reported inHide the order
  1. BloombergLeftOct 19, 9:34 AM EDT
  2. NBC NewsLeftOct 19, 9:51 AM EDT
  3. The Washington TimesRightOct 19, 9:52 AM EDT
  4. The HillCenterOct 19, 10:49 AM EDT
  5. The New York TimesLeftOct 19, 11:38 AM EDT
  6. The Daily SignalFar RightOct 19, 12:16 PM EDT
  7. The Epoch TimesFar RightOct 19, 1:55 PM EDT
  8. Washington ExaminerRightOct 19, 3:56 PM EDT
  9. The Center SquareRightOct 19, 4:09 PM EDT
  10. Los Angeles TimesLeftOct 19, 4:27 PM EDT
  11. The FederalistFar RightOct 19, 4:53 PM EDT
  12. ABC NewsLeftOct 19, 5:05 PM EDT
  13. One America NewsFar RightOct 19, 6:18 PM EDT
  14. Al Jazeera EnglishLeftOct 20, 12:38 AM EDT
  15. ReasonRightOct 20, 1:58 PM EDT

Times are the ones the outlets published in their own feeds, in Eastern time. Opinion is left out. Just the News gave only a date, so it is not placed.

Read next

Help someone else find the truth beneath the surface

Most people see one side of a story. Share this one, so they can see how every side is telling it and decide for themselves.

Email it

Seen a mistake? Tell us what is wrong with this page