PoliticsBreaking
Supreme Court allows Trump administration to expand voter citizenship database
By Mantle News
Coverage spectrum
Covered by 23 outlets across the spectrum.
29 articles in total, 4 of them opinion. The spectrum counts each outlet once and leaves opinion out. How we measure bias
The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 on Friday to let the Trump administration use an expanded version of the SAVE database, which combines Social Security and citizenship data, to help states verify voter eligibility ahead of the midterms. The unsigned order set aside a lower court ruling that had blocked the changes over privacy and accuracy concerns. The court's three liberal justices dissented. The ruling noted federal law bars broad purges of voter rolls within 90 days of an election, limiting its practical impact this cycle, though states can still make individual queries. Critics, including voting rights groups, warn the data is error-prone and could lead to eligible citizens being wrongly flagged or removed from rolls.
Headline and summary written by Mantle’s AI from the coverage below, under published rules. How this works
What happened
Key points
Each point shows who reports it, from Far Left to Far Right.
The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to allow the Trump administration to use the expanded SAVE database
Reported byLeftCenterRight
The three liberal justices (Sotomayor, Kagan, Jackson) dissented
Reported byLeftCenterRight
A lower court had found the program likely violated privacy laws and was error-prone
Reported byLeftCenterRight
Federal law bars broad voter roll purges within 90 days of an election, limiting the ruling's immediate impact
Reported byLeftCenterRight
The database combines Social Security and citizenship data and was expanded under a March 2025 Trump executive order
Reported byLeftCenterRight
Show 2 more pointsShow fewer points
Some critics cite prior cases of eligible citizens or naturalized citizens being wrongly flagged as noncitizens
Reported byLeftCenter
Attorney General Todd Blanche praised the ruling as a win for election integrity
Reported byRight
What is contested
Where accounts differ
Points the coverage does not agree on, and who says what.
Whether the database poses a meaningful risk of disenfranchising eligible voters
Left-leaning and some center outlets emphasize documented errors, such as citizens and naturalized voters being wrongly flagged, per LA Times and PBS reporting. Right-leaning outlets frame the program as targeting only noncitizens and emphasize its role in election integrity, per Daily Wire and Daily Caller.
Motivation behind the ruling
The Daily Beast (far left) suggests political favoritism, referencing justices' attendance at a state dinner before the ruling, a claim not made by other outlets.
How each side tells it
Compare views
the left
11 outlets · 3 opinion
Left-leaning outlets emphasize risks of voter purges and errors, with the Daily Beast additionally linking the ruling to the justices' attendance at a state dinner, a framing not seen in other left outlets.
Supreme Court Ruling Could Have Limited Impact on Voter Screening in Midterms
The New York TimesLeftAll left-leaning headlines the center
4 outlets
Center outlets describe the ruling neutrally as a temporary procedural win for the administration, noting both the expanded database and the limits on its midterm impact.
What the Supreme Court's voter-citizenship database decision means for the midterms
PBS NewsHourCenterAll center headlines the right
8 outlets
Right-leaning outlets frame the ruling as a win for election integrity and cite officials' praise, with far-right outlets like the Daily Caller using more charged language about 'illegal aliens'.
Ketanji Brown Jackson melts down in scathing dissent after Supreme Court hands another win to Trump
TheBlazeFar RightAll right-leaning headlines
The words they chose
Language to notice
Words that carry a judgement beyond the facts. Tap a highlighted word anywhere on the page to see why.
Left21
voter purgescontroversial data systemsupposed noncitizen votersundermining a lower court's ruling
Center3
controversial federal voter databaseaggressive campaign against noncitizen votingcontroversial database
Right2
illegal aliensBoot Illegal Aliens From Voter Rolls
In the outlets’ own words
Partisan shorthand
voter purgesMore neutral: voter roll removals
Frames the removal of ineligible voters using a term with negative connotations favored by critics
Supreme Court allows Trump administration to use expanded database for potential voter purges
Used byNBC News (Left)Slate (Far Left)
Loaded modifier
controversial data systemMore neutral: revamped data system
Labels the system as controversial in the headline without attribution, framing it negatively
The Supreme Court revives a controversial data system for citizenship checks
Used byNPR (Left)
Delegitimizing label
supposed noncitizen votersMore neutral: suspected noncitizen voters
The word 'supposed' signals in the outlet's own voice that the category is illegitimate rather than attributing the characterization.
…to the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) system for supposed noncitizen voters.
Used byHuffPost (Far Left)
Loaded verb
undermining a lower court's rulingMore neutral: staying a lower court's ruling
'Undermining' implies impropriety where the court formally stayed the ruling.
…nation’s highest judiciary sided with the Justice Department Friday, undermining a lower court’s ruling that stopped state officials from using sensitive personal data such as…
Used byThe New Republic (Far Left)
Show 22 more phrasesShow fewer
Sensational language
Huge WinMore neutral: ruling in Trump's favor
Characterizes the ruling's magnitude rather than stating what the court did.
Supreme Court Hands Trump Huge Win in Quest to Make Voting Harder
Used byThe New Republic (Far Left)
Absolutist framing
Quest to Make Voting HarderMore neutral: effort to check voter rolls for noncitizens
States a contested motive for the administration's policy as established fact.
Supreme Court Hands Trump Huge Win in Quest to Make Voting Harder
Used byThe New Republic (Far Left)
Loaded modifier
controversial federal voter databaseMore neutral: federal voter database
Labels the database as controversial without attribution
NEW YORK (AP) — The Supreme Court on Friday lifted restrictions on a controversial federal voter database before November's elections, granting President Donald Trump a…
Used byPBS NewsHour (Center)
Loaded modifier
aggressive campaign against noncitizen votingMore neutral: ongoing effort against noncitizen voting
Characterizes the administration's actions with a judgmental adjective rather than neutral description
…elections, granting President Donald Trump a temporary win in his aggressive campaign against noncitizen voting.
Used byPBS NewsHour (Center)
Sensational language
stoking fears of voter purgesMore neutral: raising concerns about voter roll removals
Emphasizes fear and drama rather than stating facts neutrally
Supreme Court upholds Trump's expanded citizenship data checks, stoking fears of voter purges
Used byLos Angeles Times (Left)
Partisan shorthand
Trumpy SCOTUS JusticesMore neutral: Conservative-majority justices
Uses a dismissive, partisan-coined label for justices that presumes their motives
Trumpy SCOTUS Justices Hand Him New Win After Cozy Dinner
Used byThe Daily Beast (Far Left)
Loaded modifier
Cozy DinnerMore neutral: state dinner
Implies improper closeness or corruption without evidence
Trumpy SCOTUS Justices Hand Him New Win After Cozy Dinner
Used byThe Daily Beast (Far Left)
Vague attribution
a controversial government programMore neutral: a government program challenged in court
Labels the program controversial without identifying who contests it.
…Court cleared the way on Friday for the Trump administration to use a controversial government program in its aggressive search for alleged voter fraud, increasing the…
Used byMother Jones (Far Left)
Loaded modifier
aggressive search for alleged voter fraudMore neutral: search for alleged voter fraud
'Aggressive' adds a judgement about the administration's conduct beyond describing it.
…administration to use a controversial government program in its aggressive search for alleged voter fraud, increasing the likelihood that eligible voters will be wrongly…
Used byMother Jones (Far Left)
Absolutist framing
Flawed DatabaseMore neutral: error-prone database, critics say
Presents a contested characterization of the database as settled fact in the outlet's voice.
Supreme Court Allows Trump to Use Flawed Database to Vet Voter Citizenship
Used byMother Jones (Far Left)
Dehumanizing label
illegal aliensMore neutral: unauthorized immigrant or noncitizen without legal status
Appears in some statutes but is widely read as dehumanizing; 'alien' frames people as foreign objects rather than residents.
…Department of Homeland Security (DHS) could use an expanded database to remove illegal aliens and non-citizens from voter rolls.
Used byThe Daily Caller (Far Right)
Dehumanizing label
Boot Illegal Aliens From Voter RollsMore neutral: Remove Noncitizens From Voter Rolls
Uses 'illegal aliens,' a dehumanizing term, to describe people rather than a neutral legal descriptor
Supreme Court Clears Way For Trump Admin To Boot Illegal Aliens From Voter Rolls
Used byThe Daily Caller (Far Right)
Absolutist framing
the Misuse of Social Security DataMore neutral: the use of Social Security data for voter checks
The headline asserts in the outlet's voice that the data use is improper, which is the contested question.
SCOTUS Greenlights the Misuse of Social Security Data
Used byCommon Dreams (Far Left)
Loaded verb
condemnedMore neutral: criticized
A judgement-laden verb for the act of issuing a critical statement.
Common Cause condemned the Supreme Court’s ruling today allowing the federal government to continue using…
Used byCommon Dreams (Far Left)
Loaded modifier
the flawed SAVE systemMore neutral: the SAVE system
Describes the database as flawed as established fact rather than attributing the characterization to the group making it.
…Court’s ruling today allowing the federal government to continue using the flawed SAVE system.
Used byCommon Dreams (Far Left)
Loaded modifier
Disenfranchise Voters Using Flawed SystemMore neutral: Remove Voters Using Contested Database
The headline asserts in the outlet's own voice that the system is flawed and that its use would disenfranchise voters, both contested characterizations.
…Common Cause Vows Immediate Legal Action Against Any Attempts to Disenfranchise Voters Using Flawed System
Used byCommon Dreams (Far Left)
Loaded modifier
controversial databaseMore neutral: expanded database
Labels the database as controversial in the headline without attribution
US Supreme Court allows Trump to use controversial database to check voter citizenship
Used byBBC News (Center)
Vague attribution
Questions remainMore neutral: state the question and who is asking
The writer is raising the question while pretending someone else did.
Questions remain about its reliability.
Used byThe New York Times (Left)
Absolutist framing
one of the most consequential midterm election cycles everMore neutral: the coming midterm elections
Presents a subjective superlative about the election as established fact.
With one of the most consequential midterm election cycles ever just about five weeks away, the U.S.
Used bySlate (Far Left)
Sensational language
bombshell decisionMore neutral: significant decision
Adds drama beyond describing the ruling's content or significance.
Supreme Court on Friday decided now would be as good a time as any to issue a bombshell decision granting the Trump administration permission to aggressively vet states’ voter…
Used bySlate (Far Left)
Loaded verb
aggressively vetMore neutral: check
The modifier characterizes the permitted checks as excessive rather than describing them.
…to issue a bombshell decision granting the Trump administration permission to aggressively vet states’ voter rolls for noncitizen voting.
Used bySlate (Far Left)
Sensational language
Uh-OhMore neutral: (omit)
An editorial aside that signals alarm rather than describing what happened.
Uh-Oh.
Used bySlate (Far Left)
Words quoted from someone else (4)Hide the quoted words
Loaded words that outlets reported someone else saying. They show what was said, not how the outlet chose to say it.
Absolutist framing
Quotednon-existent voter fraudMore neutral: rare voter fraud
Presents a disputed empirical claim as settled, though here it is attributed to a named speaker.
…of Social Security data for determining voter eligibility: “In the name of non-existent voter fraud, the Supreme Court has given the Trump administration the power to misuse…
Quoted byCommon Dreams (Far Left)
Inside a quotation: the outlets are reporting someone else’s words.
Loaded verb
Quoteddeprive American citizens of their right to voteMore neutral: could remove eligible citizens from voter rolls
Characterizes the likely effect of the ruling as deliberate deprivation, attributed to the speaker.
…Trump administration the power to misuse Social Security data to deprive American citizens of their right to vote.
Quoted byCommon Dreams (Far Left)
Inside a quotation: the outlets are reporting someone else’s words.
Loaded modifier
Quotederror-ridden systemMore neutral: system with documented errors
Strong characterization of the database, though here it is attributed to Common Cause's president.
…Kase Solomón: “The Supreme Court’s decision to allow DHS and states to use an error-ridden system is completely unacceptable and didn’t need to happen this close to the…
Quoted byCommon Dreams (Far Left)
Inside a quotation: the outlets are reporting someone else’s words.
Absolutist framing
Quotedcampaign to interfere in our elections and sow distrustMore neutral: effort the group says is intended to affect election administration
States a contested motive as fact, though it appears inside a quoted statement.
…flawed, has always been part of the Trump administration’s campaign to interfere in our elections and sow distrust — and it will fail.
Quoted byCommon Dreams (Far Left)
Inside a quotation: the outlets are reporting someone else’s words.
See for yourself
Side by side
What each side leads with and what it leaves out. Open a side to read its headlines.
From the left
11 outlets · 3 opinionLeads with
- risk of eligible voters being purged
- errors in the data system
- liberal justices' dissent
Leaves out
- Attorney General's celebratory statement
- details on the 90-day purge limitation's significance for the midterms
Reported by other sides, not found in this side’s coverage.
See the 14 headlines from the leftHide the headlines
Supreme Court Ruling Could Have Limited Impact on Voter Screening in Midterms
Federal law requires a 90-day “quiet period” before elections, likely restricting the immediate scope of a decision that allows the use of a citizenship database to examine voter rolls.
1 more from The New York Times
- CBS NewsLeft
Supreme Court lets Trump administration use SAVE database for now
In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court sided with the Trump administration in its push to use a controversial database to review state voter rolls for potential noncitizens.
- ABC NewsLeft
Supreme Court allows use of citizenship database ahead of midterms
The Supreme Court has given the Trump administration a green light to use a federal citizenship database to verify voters ahead of the midterm elections.
- TheGrioLeft
Supreme Court allows Trump administration to use voter citizenship database
The emergency ruling pauses a lower court order as legal challenges continue over the federal SAVE system. The Supreme Court
Government can use Social Security data to identify noncitizen voters, Supreme Court rules
President Donald Trump wants to let states use a federal database that includes voters’ personal information to check for noncitizens on voter rolls.
- Mother JonesFar Left
Supreme Court Allows Trump to Use Absolutist framing“Flawed Database”Presents a contested characterization of the database as settled fact in the outlet's voice.More neutral: error-prone database, critics sayDisagree with this highlight? to Vet Voter Citizenship
The Supreme Court cleared the way on Friday for the Trump administration to use Vague attribution“a controversial government program”Labels the program controversial without identifying who contests it.More neutral: a government program challenged in courtDisagree with this highlight? in its Loaded modifier“aggressive search for alleged voter fraud”'Aggressive' adds a judgement about the administration's conduct beyond describing it.More neutral: search for alleged voter fraudDisagree with this highlight?, increasing the likelihood that eligible voters will be wrongly labeled as noncitizens due to faulty data and …
Supreme Court upholds Trump's expanded citizenship data checks, Sensational language“stoking fears of voter purges”Emphasizes fear and drama rather than stating facts neutrallyMore neutral: raising concerns about voter roll removalsDisagree with this highlight?
The Trump administration says Social Security data may help spot noncitizens who are registered to vote.
- The New RepublicFar Left
Supreme Court Hands Trump Sensational language“Huge Win”Characterizes the ruling's magnitude rather than stating what the court did.More neutral: ruling in Trump's favorDisagree with this highlight? in Absolutist framing“Quest to Make Voting Harder”States a contested motive for the administration's policy as established fact.More neutral: effort to check voter rolls for noncitizensDisagree with this highlight?
The Supreme Court just brought Donald Trump’s immigration database back to life. The nation’s highest judiciary sided with the Justice Department Friday, Loaded verb“undermining a lower court’s ruling”'Undermining' implies impropriety where the court formally stayed the ruling.More neutral: staying a lower court's rulingDisagree with this highlight? that stopped state officials from using sensitive personal data such as Social Security …
- NBC NewsLeft
Supreme Court allows Trump administration to use expanded database for potential Partisan shorthand“voter purges”Frames the removal of ineligible voters using a term with negative connotations favored by criticsMore neutral: voter roll removalsDisagree with this highlight?
The Supreme Court permitted the Trump administration to expand a federal database containing citizenship information, as it encourages states to purge people from voter rolls.
- HuffPostFar Left
Supreme Court Lets Trump Admin Use Social Security Info To Screen For Noncitizen Voters
The unsigned decision overrules lower court decisions that blocked data matching across government agencies.
- NPRLeft
The Supreme Court revives a Loaded modifier“controversial data system”Labels the system as controversial in the headline without attribution, framing it negativelyMore neutral: revamped data systemDisagree with this highlight? for citizenship checks
The Supreme Court is allowing use of a data system that Trump officials overhauled. The system has erroneously flagged U.S. citizens and a lower court found it violated federal privacy protections.
The Supreme Court Bets That Trump and GOP States Will Follow the Law on Partisan shorthand“Voter Purges”Opponents' name for roll maintenance or removals; give the number and the reason stated.More neutral: removal of (number) names from the voter rollsDisagree with this highlight?. Sensational language“Uh-Oh”An editorial aside that signals alarm rather than describing what happened.More neutral: (omit)Disagree with this highlight?.
Their decision hinges on the Trump administration and GOP-led states actually following the law.
Following SCOTUS Ruling, Common Cause Vows Immediate Legal Action Against Any Attempts to Loaded modifier“Disenfranchise Voters Using Flawed System”The headline asserts in the outlet's own voice that the system is flawed and that its use would disenfranchise voters, both contested characterizations.More neutral: Remove Voters Using Contested DatabaseDisagree with this highlight?
Common Cause Loaded verb“condemned”A judgement-laden verb for the act of issuing a critical statement.More neutral: criticizedDisagree with this highlight? the Supreme Court’s ruling today allowing the federal government to continue using Loaded modifier“the flawed SAVE system”Describes the database as flawed as established fact rather than attributing the characterization to the group making it.More neutral: the SAVE systemDisagree with this highlight?. Statement from Common Cause President & CEO Virginia Kase Solomón: “The Supreme Court’s decision to allow DHS and states to use an error-ridden …
1 more from Common Dreams
Partisan shorthand“Trumpy SCOTUS Justices”Uses a dismissive, partisan-coined label for justices that presumes their motivesMore neutral: Conservative-majority justicesDisagree with this highlight? Hand Him New Win After Loaded modifier“Cozy Dinner”Implies improper closeness or corruption without evidenceMore neutral: state dinnerDisagree with this highlight?
The Supreme Court handed President Donald Trump a victory on Friday in his campaign to change how Americans vote. The decision came one day after three of the Court’s conservative justices, along with their spouses, attended a state dinner for Chinese President Xi Jinping at the …
From the center
4 outletsLeads with
- legal and procedural details of the ruling
- limited midterm impact due to purge timing rules
- dissent from liberal justices
Leaves out
- Attorney General Blanche's statement
- specific past errors like Nevada or New Jersey registration mistakes
Reported by other sides, not found in this side’s coverage.
See the 5 headlines from the centerHide the headlines
- PBS NewsHourCenter
What the Supreme Court's voter-citizenship database decision means for the midterms
The Supreme Court revived a controversial voter-citizenship database less than two months ahead of the midterm elections. In the ruling, the court sided with the Trump administration, which is seeking to use the Department of Homeland Security's SAVE database to review state …
- BBC NewsCenter
US Supreme Court allows Trump to use Loaded modifier“controversial database”Labels the database as controversial in the headline without attributionMore neutral: expanded databaseDisagree with this highlight? to check voter citizenship
Critics have questioned the reliability of the data, warning it could result in US citizens being wrongly removed from electoral rolls.
- AxiosCenter
Trump administration can use revamped voter screening tool for now, SCOTUS rules
The Supreme Court cleared the way Friday for the Trump administration's expanded system to verify voters' citizenship status, handing the administration a win for now in its campaign to implement new election rules ahead of the midterms. …
Supreme Court lets Trump administration use revamped federal voter eligibility database for now
The Supreme Court on Friday lifted restrictions on a controversial federal voter database before November's elections, granting President Donald Trump a temporary win in his aggressive campaign against noncitizen voting.
- Roll CallCenter
Supreme Court revives expansion of federal voter database
The Supreme Court on Friday allowed the Trump administration to restart its effort to create a nationwide database of purportedly eligible voters, setting aside a lower court ruling which found likely privacy and accuracy problems with the database. …
From the right
8 outletsLeads with
- election integrity
- citizenship verification
- Trump administration win
Leaves out
- specific past cases of eligible citizens or naturalized citizens being wrongly flagged
- privacy concerns raised by lower court
Reported by other sides, not found in this side’s coverage.
See the 8 headlines from the rightHide the headlines
- TheBlazeFar Right
Ketanji Brown Jackson melts down in scathing dissent after Supreme Court hands another win to Trump
The U.S. Supreme Court says in a split decision Friday that the Trump administration can follow through with a new way of cross-checking voter eligibility. …
- Hot AirFar Right
Supreme Court Sides With Trump Administration on Screening Voters
A big win for the Trump administration happened at the Supreme Court today. The court ruled that states could in fact use a large federal government database to screen voters for eligibility and keep non-citizens from voting.
- Daily MailRight
Trump scores Supreme Court win as justices let him hunt for noncitizens on voter rolls using Social Security data
The Supreme Court ruled Friday that states can use select government data to verify citizenship for voters on election rolls, marking a win for President Donald Trump's efforts to root out voter fraud.
- The Western JournalFar Right
BREAKING: Trump Handed Huge Election Win as Supreme Court Allows Voter Verification Database to Stand
President Donald Trump scored a huge victory on Friday after the Supreme Court ruled that his administration can continue using Social Security records to verify voters’ citizenship status. The unsigned
- The Daily CallerFar Right
Supreme Court Clears Way For Trump Admin To Dehumanizing label“Boot Illegal Aliens From Voter Rolls”Uses 'illegal aliens,' a dehumanizing term, to describe people rather than a neutral legal descriptorMore neutral: Remove Noncitizens From Voter RollsDisagree with this highlight?
The Supreme Court ruled Friday that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) could use an expanded database to remove Dehumanizing label“illegal aliens”Appears in some statutes but is widely read as dehumanizing; 'alien' frames people as foreign objects rather than residents.More neutral: unauthorized immigrant, noncitizen without legal statusDisagree with this highlight? and non-citizens from voter rolls. …
- The Daily WireFar Right
Supreme Court Hands Trump Win On Voter Citizenship Checks Ahead Of Midterms
A Supreme Court decision on Friday will allow the Trump administration to work with states to verify voters’ citizenship. The 6-3 ruling allows state officials to use an expanded version of a federal database to verify that registered voters are citizens. …
- The FederalistFar Right
SCOTUS Restores DHS Program Used To Identify Noncitizens On Voter Rolls
'In light of these provisions, this Court is likely to reverse the District Court’s holding that the federal defendants violated the Social Security Act, the Privacy Act, and the APA.'
- The Center SquareRight
Supreme Court allows citizenship verification program
(The Center Square) - The U.S. Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision on Friday, temporarily allowed the Trump administration to use a federal database that verifies whether voters are eligible to participate in an election.
Articles you open from here build My Mix, a private picture of how your reading spreads across the spectrum, kept on this device. What is My Mix?
The left is Far Left and Left together. The right is Right and Far Right together. Every outlet keeps its own five-point rating.
Who reported it when
How the coverage built up
Left
2 hr 27 min later
Its first report, Sep 25, 11:40 AM EDT
Center
First to report
Roll Call, Sep 25, 9:14 AM EDT
Right
2 hr 25 min later
Its first report, Sep 25, 11:39 AM EDT
See the order the outlets reported inHide the order
- Roll CallCenterSep 25, 9:14 AM EDT
- The Center SquareRightSep 25, 11:39 AM EDT
- NPRLeftSep 25, 11:40 AM EDT
- HuffPostFar LeftSep 25, 11:51 AM EDT
- NBC NewsLeftSep 25, 11:52 AM EDT
- The New RepublicFar LeftSep 25, 12:01 PM EDT
- PBS NewsHourCenterSep 25, 12:06 PM EDT
- Los Angeles TimesLeftSep 25, 12:11 PM EDT
- The FederalistFar RightSep 25, 12:52 PM EDT
- The Daily WireFar RightSep 25, 12:58 PM EDT
- Mother JonesFar LeftSep 25, 1:01 PM EDT
- The Daily CallerFar RightSep 25, 1:22 PM EDT
- The Washington PostLeftSep 25, 1:55 PM EDT
- TheGrioLeftSep 25, 1:55 PM EDT
- AxiosCenterSep 25, 2:19 PM EDT
- The Western JournalFar RightSep 25, 2:26 PM EDT
- Daily MailRightSep 25, 2:30 PM EDT
- Hot AirFar RightSep 25, 2:40 PM EDT
- ABC NewsLeftSep 25, 3:03 PM EDT
- BBC NewsCenterSep 25, 3:13 PM EDT
- The New York TimesLeftSep 25, 3:15 PM EDT
- TheBlazeFar RightSep 25, 3:59 PM EDT
- CBS NewsLeftSep 25, 4:22 PM EDT
Times are the ones the outlets published in their own feeds, in Eastern time. Opinion is left out.
Read next
More on Politics
PoliticsBreaking
Protesters are removed from Trump rally in South Carolina after a supporter hits one
3 outlets
More on Politics
PoliticsDeveloping
Musk backs Paxton in Texas Senate race as Talarico criticizes his spending
3 outlets
Next in today’s stories
WorldDeveloping
Witkoff meets Putin in St. Petersburg; Kremlin says it is ready for three-way talks
17 outlets
Next in today’s stories
TechnologyBreaking
Officials warn of critical PHP flaws, prompting some websites to go offline
19 outlets
A story one side mostly skipped
PoliticsBreaking
Polling firm Wedgewood admits its midterm polls were fabricated
14 outletsQuiet on the left