Skip to content

Government & PolicyDeveloping

Supreme Court opens new term with climate, immigration and gun rights cases on docket

By

Coverage spectrum

Covered by 6 outlets across the spectrum.

11 articles in total, 4 of them opinion. The spectrum counts each outlet once and leaves opinion out. How we measure bias

The U.S. Supreme Court begins its new term, with oral arguments starting Oct. 5. Among the cases the justices will hear is Suncor Energy, Inc. v. County Commissioners of Boulder County, which asks whether state and local governments can use tort law to seek damages from energy companies over alleged climate-change harms. The term's docket also includes cases on gun rights, immigration, voting rights, discrimination, consumer protection and religious liberty. The court, which has six conservative appointees including three picked by President Trump, previously ruled against several Trump administration policies, including restrictions on mail-in ballots, tariffs, an effort to curb birthright citizenship and the firing of a Federal Reserve official. Trump has publicly criticized the justices, including those he appointed, saying the court has “let our country down.”

Headline and summary written by Mantle’s AI from the coverage below, under published rules. How this works

What happened

Key points

Each point shows who reports it, from Far Left to Far Right.

  1. The Supreme Court's new term begins with oral arguments starting Oct. 5.

    Reported byLeftCenterRight

  2. The court will hear Suncor Energy v. Boulder County, which concerns whether state and local governments can pursue tort claims against energy companies for climate-related damages.

    Reported byLeftCenterRight

  3. The term's docket also includes cases on gun rights, immigration, voting rights, discrimination and religious liberty.

    Reported byCenterRight

  4. President Trump has criticized the Supreme Court, including justices he appointed, after it ruled against his administration on mail-in ballots, tariffs, birthright citizenship and a Federal Reserve firing.

    Reported byLeft

  5. Boulder County first sued Suncor and Exxon Mobil in 2018, alleging the companies deceived the public about the dangers of climate change; ranchers in Colorado describe wildfire and drought losses tied to climate change.

    Reported byLeft

  6. Some right-leaning commentators describe the Suncor case as an effort by climate activists to achieve policy goals in court after failing to win them through elections.

    Reported byRight

What is contested

Where accounts differ

Points the coverage does not agree on, and who says what.

  • The motivation behind the Suncor Energy v. Boulder County lawsuit

    National Review and The Federalist describe the case as an effort by climate activists and “leftists” to achieve, through litigation, climate policies they could not win through elections. Sen. Kevin Cramer, quoted by The Center Square, calls the lawsuit “anti-capitalism.” Mother Jones and Boulder County's legal team frame it instead as holding Suncor and Exxon accountable for alleged deception about climate change and for local harms like wildfires and drought.

  • Trump's overall standing before the Supreme Court

    NBC reports that Trump has criticized the justices, including his own appointees, as having let the country down, even though he has an overall winning record at the court; no other outlet in this set addresses the president's relationship with the justices.

How each side tells it

Compare views

  • the left

    1 outlet · 1 opinion

    NBC frames the term around Trump's ongoing conflict with the court despite his mixed record, while Mother Jones (further left) tells the story through Colorado ranchers harmed by wildfires and drought, framing the Suncor case as accountability for fossil-fuel companies.

    Supreme Court to decide multiple high-profile cases in new term
    NBC NewsLeftAll left-leaning headlines

  • the center

    2 outlets

    Roll Call and PBS both offer broad, multi-case previews of the new term without strong framing toward any outcome.

    Supreme Court ready to tackle climate, immigration and gun rights. Here are 5 cases to watch
    PBS NewsHourCenterAll center headlines

  • the right

    3 outlets · 3 opinion

    Mainstream right outlets like Reason, The Center Square/Just the News and The Washington Times preview the cases factually, while further-right outlets National Review and The Federalist cast the Suncor case as left-wing activists using courts to impose climate policy rejected by voters.

    Partisan shorthand“Climate Lawfare”Uses a loaded term implying the lawsuit is an illegitimate abuse of the legal system rather than a neutral description of ongoing litigation.More neutral: Climate LitigationDisagree with this highlight?: Experts say Supreme Court's Suncor case may stop blue states regulating red states
    The Washington TimesRightAll right-leaning headlines

The words they chose

Language to notice

Words that carry a judgement beyond the facts. Tap a highlighted word anywhere on the page to see why.

  • Left1

    to Make Exxon and Suncor Pay

  • Center0

    No loaded words in its own voice.

  • Right6

    activists are trying to get the legal system to enact their desired climate policiesLeftists are trying to weaponize our legal systembankrupt lawful industriestear down our capitalist system

In the outlets’ own words

  • Delegitimizing label

    activists are trying to get the legal system to enact their desired climate policiesMore neutral: plaintiffs are pursuing climate-related legal claims in court

    Frames plaintiffs' legal claims as illegitimate political maneuvering rather than a legal dispute to be adjudicated on the merits.

    Unable to elect legislative majorities, activists are trying to get the legal system to enact their desired climate policies.

    Used byNational Review (Far Right)

  • Loaded verb

    Leftists are trying to weaponize our legal systemMore neutral: Climate advocates are using the legal system

    Casts the plaintiffs' use of courts as an illegitimate attack rather than a legal strategy, and labels them with a partisan term.

    Leftists are trying to weaponize our legal system to bankrupt lawful industries in a last-ditch effort to tear…

    Used byThe Federalist (Far Right)

  • Sensational language

    bankrupt lawful industriesMore neutral: impose significant financial liability on energy companies

    Exaggerates the likely consequence of the litigation to manufacture alarm.

    Leftists are trying to weaponize our legal system to bankrupt lawful industries in a last-ditch effort to tear down our capitalist system.

    Used byThe Federalist (Far Right)

  • Sensational language

    tear down our capitalist systemMore neutral: undermine the current economic system

    Presents a speculative, extreme outcome as the plaintiffs' actual goal without evidence.

    …our legal system to bankrupt lawful industries in a last-ditch effort to tear down our capitalist system.

    Used byThe Federalist (Far Right)

Show 3 more phrasesShow fewer

  • Partisan shorthand

    Impose A Green New Deal That Voters RejectedMore neutral: Impose Climate Policies Through the Courts

    Uses a politically loaded term tied to one side's policy agenda to characterize the lawsuit's goal, presenting a contested framing as settled fact.

    Climate Activists Want The Supreme Court To Impose A Green New Deal That Voters Rejected

    Used byThe Federalist (Far Right)

  • Loaded verb

    to Make Exxon and Suncor PayMore neutral: over climate liability claims against Exxon and Suncor

    States the plaintiffs' desired legal outcome as the article's own framing of the case rather than as a contested claim.

    Burned Cattle, Drought, Smoke-Choked Pastures—and the SCOTUS Case to Make Exxon and Suncor Pay

    Used byMother Jones (Far Left)

  • Partisan shorthand

    Climate LawfareMore neutral: Climate Litigation

    Uses a loaded term implying the lawsuit is an illegitimate abuse of the legal system rather than a neutral description of ongoing litigation.

    Climate Lawfare: Experts say Supreme Court's Suncor case may stop blue states regulating red…

    Used byThe Washington Times (Right)

See the full language guide

See for yourself

Side by side

What each side leads with and what it leaves out. Open a side to read its headlines.

From the left

1 outlet · 1 opinion

Leads with

  • Trump's criticism of the court
  • the court's mixed rulings for and against Trump
  • personal accounts of climate-related losses
  • corporate accountability for emissions

Leaves out

  • discrimination and consumer-protection cases on the docket
  • claims that the climate lawsuits reflect activist strategy

Reported by other sides, not found in this side’s coverage.

See the 2 headlines from the leftHide the headlines
  • NBC NewsLeft

    Supreme Court to decide multiple high-profile cases in new term

    The Supreme Court is set to begin its new term with a number of high-profile cases involving President Trump on the docket. NBC News’ Lawrence Hurley explains which cases to look for.

    Read at NBC News (opens in a new tab)
    1 more from NBC News
  • Mother JonesFar LeftOpinion

    Burned Cattle, Drought, Smoke-Choked Pastures—and the SCOTUS Case Loaded verb“to Make Exxon and Suncor Pay”States the plaintiffs' desired legal outcome as the article's own framing of the case rather than as a contested claim.More neutral: over climate liability claims against Exxon and SuncorDisagree with this highlight?

    After one of the largest wildfires in state history devastated Rio Blanco County, Colorado in 2025, Deirdre Macnab saw her share of horrors across the community: cows burned to death, pigs died from sunstroke, and pastures were blanketed in thick black smoke. …

    Read at Mother Jones (opens in a new tab)

From the center

2 outlets

Leads with

  • the range of cases on the docket
  • expert commentary on what to watch
  • the shift from the emergency ‘shadow docket’ to the regular docket

Leaves out

  • Trump's personal criticism of the justices

Reported by other sides, not found in this side’s coverage.

See the 2 headlines from the centerHide the headlines
  • PBS NewsHourCenter

    Supreme Court ready to tackle climate, immigration and gun rights. Here are 5 cases to watch

    When the U.S. Supreme Court returns Monday, the justices will kick off a new term featuring cases on climate change, gun rights, immigration and religious liberty.

    Read at PBS NewsHour (opens in a new tab)
  • Roll CallCenter

    Guns, voting and immigration on deck for Supreme Court

    The Supreme Court begins its new term Monday facing cases on Americans’ civil rights, federalist struggles between states and the federal government, and the looming specter of more last-second litigation over the coming midterm elections. …

    Read at Roll Call (opens in a new tab)

From the right

3 outlets · 3 opinion

Leads with

  • the Suncor case's economic and legal stakes
  • concerns about one state regulating another's industries
  • framing of climate litigation as ‘lawfare’ or activist overreach

Leaves out

  • Trump's criticism of the court
  • ranchers' and residents' accounts of climate-related losses

Reported by other sides, not found in this side’s coverage.

See the 6 headlines from the rightHide the headlines
  • The Washington TimesRight

    Partisan shorthand“Climate Lawfare”Uses a loaded term implying the lawsuit is an illegitimate abuse of the legal system rather than a neutral description of ongoing litigation.More neutral: Climate LitigationDisagree with this highlight?: Experts say Supreme Court's Suncor case may stop blue states regulating red states

    Can one state govern another? The Washington Times' "Climate Lawfare" event, hosted by Alex Swoyer, brings together West Virginia Solicitor General Michael Williams, Article III Project's Josh Hammer and Alliance for Consumers' O.H. …

    Read at The Washington Times (opens in a new tab)
  • The Center SquareRight

    Supreme Court to hear climate, consumer, discrimination cases

    (The Center Square) - The U.S. Supreme Court will hear significant cases on climate change, consumer protection and discrimination in its upcoming term.

    Read at The Center Square (opens in a new tab)

    Also published by Just the News. It counts once.

  • The FederalistFar RightOpinion

    Climate Activists Want The Supreme Court To Partisan shorthand“Impose A Green New Deal That Voters Rejected”Uses a politically loaded term tied to one side's policy agenda to characterize the lawsuit's goal, presenting a contested framing as settled fact.More neutral: Impose Climate Policies Through the CourtsDisagree with this highlight?

    Leftists are trying to weaponize our legal system to bankrupt lawful industries in a last-ditch effort to tear down our capitalist system.

    Read at The Federalist (opens in a new tab)
  • National ReviewFar RightOpinion

    Why the Supreme Court Should Shut Down Boulder’s Climate Case

    Unable to elect legislative majorities, Delegitimizing label“activists are trying to get the legal system to enact their desired climate policies”Frames plaintiffs' legal claims as illegitimate political maneuvering rather than a legal dispute to be adjudicated on the merits.More neutral: plaintiffs are pursuing climate-related legal claims in courtDisagree with this highlight?.

    Read at National Review (opens in a new tab)
  • ReasonRightOpinion

    2 Supreme Court Cases to Watch This Month

    The U.S. Supreme Court's 2026–2027 term officially kicks off on Monday. But you may be forgiven if you didn't realize the justices had actually gone away on a summer break. …

    Read at Reason (opens in a new tab)
  • Just the NewsFar RightCenter Square report

    Supreme Court back in session first Monday of October: will hear climate and discrimination cases

    Just the News published a report that is shown in full at The Center Square. The headline is the one Just the News gave it.

    Read at Just the News (opens in a new tab)

Articles you open from here build My Mix, a private picture of how your reading spreads across the spectrum, kept on this device. What is My Mix?

The left is Far Left and Left together. The right is Right and Far Right together. Every outlet keeps its own five-point rating.

Who reported it when

How the coverage built up

  • Left

    13 hr 15 min later

    Its first report, Oct 2, 6:00 AM EDT

  • Center

    8 hr 15 min later

    Its first report, Oct 2, 1:00 AM EDT

  • Right

    First to report

    The Center Square, Oct 1, 4:45 PM EDT

See the order the outlets reported inHide the order
  1. The Center SquareRightOct 1, 4:45 PM EDT
  2. Roll CallCenterOct 2, 1:00 AM EDT
  3. NBC NewsLeftOct 2, 6:00 AM EDT
  4. The Washington TimesRightOct 2, 11:18 AM EDT
  5. PBS NewsHourCenterOct 2, 5:45 PM EDT

Times are the ones the outlets published in their own feeds, in Eastern time. Opinion is left out. Just the News gave only a date, so it is not placed.

Read next

Help someone else find the truth beneath the surface

Most people see one side of a story. Share this one, so they can see how every side is telling it and decide for themselves.

Email it

Seen a mistake? Tell us what is wrong with this page