Skip to content

TechnologyDeveloping

OpenAI and three fired safety researchers dispute the reasons for their dismissals

By

Coverage spectrum

Covered by 9 outlets across the spectrum.

10 articles in total. The spectrum counts each outlet once and leaves opinion out. How we measure bias

OpenAI logo and wordmark on a dark screen with blurred colorful reflections
Image via CBS NewsHow images are chosenReport this image

OpenAI fired three AI safety researchers. The former employees say they were punished for raising safety concerns, and in an open letter they warned that the dismissals would have a chilling effect on colleagues who want to speak up about safety risks. OpenAI says the three committed a significant breach of trust, including mishandling sensitive information, and says it does not terminate employees for raising concerns. The company says it stands by the decision. Each side’s account of why the three were let go remains in dispute.

Headline and summary written by Mantle’s AI from the coverage below, under published rules. How this works

What happened

Key points

Each point shows who reports it, from Far Left to Far Right.

  1. OpenAI fired three AI safety researchers.

    Across the spectrumReported byLeft4Center2Right1Far Right1See the outletsHide the outlets
    Left
    Business Insider, Al Jazeera English, CBS News, NPR
    Center
    CNBC, BBC News
    Right
    New York Post
    Far Right
    The Daily Caller

  2. The former researchers say they were fired for raising safety concerns, and their open letter warned that the firings would make colleagues afraid to speak up.

    Reported byLeft4Center1Right1Far Right1See the outletsHide the outlets
    Left
    Business Insider, Al Jazeera English, CBS News, NPR
    Center
    BBC News
    Right
    New York Post
    Far Right
    The Daily Caller

  3. OpenAI says the researchers were fired for a significant breach of trust, including mishandling sensitive information, and that it does not fire employees for raising concerns.

    Across the spectrumReported byLeft3Center2Right1Far Right1See the outletsHide the outlets
    Left
    Business Insider, CBS News, NPR
    Center
    CNBC, BBC News
    Right
    New York Post
    Far Right
    The Daily Caller

What is contested

Where accounts differ

Points the coverage does not agree on, and who says what.

  • Why the three researchers were fired.

    The former researchers say they were punished for raising safety concerns. OpenAI says they were fired for a significant breach of trust, including mishandling sensitive information.

  • Whether OpenAI punishes employees who raise safety concerns.

    OpenAI says it does not terminate employees for raising concerns. The researchers say their dismissals will leave current workers afraid to speak up on safety risks.

How each side tells it

Compare views

  • the left

    4 outlets

    Left-side headlines lead with the researchers’ safety claims and their warning of a chilling effect, while Business Insider and CBS lead with OpenAI’s denial and response; NPR frames the story as a question about the company’s commitment to safety.

    Fired OpenAI employees question the company's commitment to safety
    NPRLeftAll left-leaning headlines

  • the center

    2 outlets

    Center headlines (CNBC and BBC) lead with OpenAI’s defense of the firings and attribute the researchers’ safety account as their own claim, without the chilling-effect framing used on the left.

    Fired OpenAI researchers say they were let go for 'prioritising safety'
    BBC NewsCenterAll center headlines

  • the right

    3 outlets

    The New York Post headline frames the researchers’ safety claim as a claim OpenAI rejects, and the Daily Caller headline, the more pointed of the two, states OpenAI’s account as fact and sets the warnings aside.

    'Breach of trust.' OpenAI fires 3 safety researchers in dispute over AI risks
    The Washington TimesRightAll right-leaning headlines

The words they chose

Language to notice

Words that carry a judgement beyond the facts. Tap a highlighted word anywhere on the page to see why.

  • Left1

    levelled the accusations

  • Center0

    No loaded words in its own voice.

  • Right1

    eggheads

In the outlets’ own words

  • Loaded verb

    levelled the accusationsMore neutral: said

    The verb levelled frames the researchers’ statements as an attack, while the neutral verb reports the same statements without that judgement.

    Safety researchers Mikita Balesni, Tomek Korbak and Jasmine Wang levelled the accusations on Thursday after their dismissals last week.

    Used byAl Jazeera English (Left)

  • Loaded modifier

    eggheadsMore neutral: researchers

    Eggheads is a mocking nickname that belittles the researchers rather than describing them neutrally.

    …breach of trust.” The AI giant said Friday that its decision to part ways with the eggheads wasn’t because they had raised safety concerns, but because their actions went…

    Used byNew York Post (Right)

See the full language guide

See for yourself

Side by side

What each side leads with and what it leaves out. Open a side to read its headlines.

From the left

4 outlets

Leads with

  • researchers’ claim of punishment for safety concerns
  • chilling effect on workers who speak up
  • OpenAI’s denial and breach-of-trust explanation
  • questions about the company’s commitment to safety
See the 4 headlines from the leftHide the headlines

From the center

2 outlets

Leads with

  • OpenAI’s breach-of-trust explanation
  • mishandling of sensitive information
  • researchers’ claim they were fired for prioritising safety

Leaves out

  • the open letter’s warning of a chilling effect on colleagues’ willingness to speak up

Reported by other sides, not found in this side’s coverage.

See the 2 headlines from the centerHide the headlines
  • BBC NewsCenter

    Fired OpenAI researchers say they were let go for 'prioritising safety'

    The AI firm instead claims the researchers were fired for mishandling sensitive information.

    Read at BBC News (opens in a new tab)
  • CNBCCenter

    OpenAI defends decision to fire researchers: 'These decisions were not about raising safety concerns or speaking out'

    OpenAI has defended its decision to fire three safety researchers for what the AI lab has described as a "significant breach of trust"

    Read at CNBC (opens in a new tab)

From the right

3 outlets

Leads with

  • OpenAI’s rejection of the safety-warning claim
  • breach of trust as the stated reason
  • company’s statement that it does not punish raising concerns
See the 3 headlines from the rightHide the headlines
  • The Washington TimesRight

    'Breach of trust.' OpenAI fires 3 safety researchers in dispute over AI risks

    OpenAI said on Friday that it fired three safety researchers for a "breach of trust," defending the dismissals after the trio accused the company of putting its corporate interests before safety as the reason for removing them.

    Read at The Washington Times (opens in a new tab)
  • The Daily CallerFar Right

    OpenAI Says Three Fired Safety Researchers Got The Boot Over ‘Breach Of Trust,’ Not Their Warnings

    A frontier artificial intelligence firm says it fired safety researchers for breaking its trust, not for blowing the whistle. OpenAI unveiled on Friday that an internal probe found “a significant breach of trust” by three former safety researchers: Mikita Balesni, Tomek Korbak …

    Read at The Daily Caller (opens in a new tab)
  • New York PostRight

    OpenAI rejects researchers’ claim they were fired over safety warnings, says they committed ‘breach of trust’

    OpenAI defended its firing of three safety researchers who raised concerns about AI societal threats, saying the trio committed a “significant breach of trust.”

    Read at New York Post (opens in a new tab)

Articles you open from here build My Mix, a private picture of how your reading spreads across the spectrum, kept on this device. What is My Mix?

The left is Far Left and Left together. The right is Right and Far Right together. Every outlet keeps its own five-point rating.

Who reported it when

How the coverage built up

  • Left

    First to report

    Business Insider, Oct 8, 6:38 PM EDT

  • Center

    8 hr 45 min later

    Its first report, Oct 9, 3:23 AM EDT

  • Right

    18 hr 20 min later

    Its first report, Oct 9, 12:58 PM EDT

See the order the outlets reported inHide the order
  1. Business InsiderLeftOct 8, 6:38 PM EDT
  2. CNBCCenterOct 9, 3:23 AM EDT
  3. BBC NewsCenterOct 9, 5:30 AM EDT
  4. Al Jazeera EnglishLeftOct 9, 6:39 AM EDT
  5. CBS NewsLeftOct 9, 12:21 PM EDT
  6. New York PostRightOct 9, 12:58 PM EDT
  7. The Daily CallerFar RightOct 9, 1:29 PM EDT
  8. NPRLeftOct 9, 5:28 PM EDT
  9. The Washington TimesRightOct 10, 9:51 AM EDT

Times are the ones the outlets published in their own feeds, in Eastern time. Opinion is left out.

Read next

Help someone else find the truth beneath the surface

Most people see one side of a story. Share this one, so they can see how every side is telling it and decide for themselves.

Email it

Seen a mistake? Tell us what is wrong with this page