Skip to content

Government & PolicyDeveloping

White House Cancels $810 Million in Congress-Approved Funding via Pocket Rescission

By

Coverage spectrum

Covered by 25 outlets across the spectrum.

36 articles in total, 3 of them opinion. The spectrum counts each outlet once and leaves opinion out. How we measure bias

The Trump administration announced Friday it is canceling nearly $810 million (described by some as nearly $1 billion) in funding previously approved by Congress, using a rarely used budget tool known as a pocket rescission. The move targets programs for refugee and immigrant services, diversity-focused initiatives, and some education and health programs. The White House’s Office of Management and Budget said the cuts target “the most harmful government spending.” It is the second time the administration has used this tactic. Some lawmakers in both parties, including Republicans, have criticized the move, with some calling it illegal, setting up a new dispute with Congress over control of federal spending.

Headline and summary written by Mantle’s AI from the coverage below, under published rules. How this works

What happened

Key points

Each point shows who reports it, from Far Left to Far Right.

  1. The White House canceled approximately $810 million in funding previously appropriated by Congress using a pocket rescission.

    Reported byLeftCenterRight

  2. The cuts target programs serving refugees, immigrants, diversity initiatives, and some education and health programs.

    Reported byLeftCenterRight

  3. This marks the second time the administration has used this rescission tactic in as many years.

    Reported byLeftCenter

  4. Some lawmakers from both parties have criticized the move, with some calling it illegal.

    Reported byLeftCenter

  5. The White House’s Office of Management and Budget described the cuts as targeting “the most harmful government spending.”

    Reported byLeft

  6. Republican lawmakers have specifically pushed back against the cuts, creating friction within Trump’s own party.

    Reported byCenter

What is contested

Where accounts differ

Points the coverage does not agree on, and who says what.

  • Whether the pocket rescission is a legal use of presidential authority.

    Some Democratic and Republican lawmakers, as reported by left and center outlets, call the maneuver illegal because it bypasses Congress’s appropriations process. The White House and right-leaning outlets frame it as a legitimate budget tool used to eliminate wasteful or harmful spending.

  • The total amount of funding affected.

    Most outlets cite $810 million as the specific rescission amount, while several describe the overall total, including related prior actions, as 'nearly $1 billion.'

How each side tells it

Compare views

  • the left

    12 outlets

    Left-leaning outlets, including a shared Associated Press report published by several outlets, describe the action as Trump using a rare, contested power to unilaterally override Congress’s spending decisions, emphasizing bipartisan legal objections.

    Democrats Loaded verb“fail to stop”Frames Democrats’ unsuccessful effort in terms of failure rather than neutrally describing the outcome.More neutral: do not stopDisagree with this highlight? Trump from canceling $810M in funds approved by Congress
    The Washington PostLeftAll left-leaning headlines

  • the center

    5 outlets

    Center outlets frame the story procedurally, focusing on the institutional clash between the executive and legislative branches and highlighting pushback from lawmakers across the spectrum, including Republicans.

    Housing groups challenge Trump funding clawback
    Roll CallCenterAll center headlines

  • the right

    8 outlets · 1 opinion

    Right-leaning outlets, including Far Right ones, frame the cuts as a justified reduction of wasteful spending, emphasizing that funds were directed toward illegal immigrants and race-based programs.

    Collins exploring pocket rescissions ban after Trump cancels $810 million in federal spending
    Washington ExaminerRightAll right-leaning headlines

The words they chose

Language to notice

Words that carry a judgement beyond the facts. Tap a highlighted word anywhere on the page to see why.

  • Left10

    slamso-calledaxe fundingDefying Congress

  • Center4

    so-calledso-called pocket rescissionprecarious moment for the GOPdo-or-die cliff

  • Right14

    maneuvers around Congressblistering New York Post reportlisten to the howling begindropped another bombshell

In the outlets’ own words

  • Delegitimizing label

    so-calledMore neutral: (omit)

    Sneer quotes in word form.

    The executive branch would effectively send the funds back to Congress using so-called pocket rescissions, a rare budgetary tactic that the Trump administration has used…

    Used byNBC News (Left)Roll Call (Center)

  • Loaded verb

    slamMore neutral: criticize

    "Slam" is a dramatic verb that amplifies the intensity of lawmakers' criticism beyond a neutral description.

    Lawmakers slam Trump’s ‘unlawful’ move to cut $810 million in federal funds

    Used byNBC News (Left)The Washington Post (Left)

  • Loaded verb

    maneuvers around CongressMore neutral: bypasses Congress

    Implies evasive or underhanded action rather than describing the legal mechanism neutrally

    White House maneuvers around Congress to cut $810 million with 'pocket rescission'

    Used byThe Washington Times (Right)

  • Loaded verb

    axe fundingMore neutral: cut funding

    "Axe" is a dramatic verb implying aggressive or arbitrary cutting rather than a neutral description of canceling funds.

    …Congress, the White House announced on Friday, using a rare and contested power to axe funding for immigrant services and diversity-focused initiatives.

    Used byThe Guardian (Left)

Show 23 more phrasesShow fewer

  • Loaded verb

    Defying CongressMore neutral: Seeking to cancel funds Congress approved

    Characterizes the action as defiance rather than as the use of a claimed statutory authority, which is the contested question.

    Trump Proposes $810 Million in Education and Health Cuts, Defying Congress

    Used byThe New York Times (Left)

  • Sensational language

    blistering New York Post reportMore neutral: a New York Post report

    Describes a source report with a dramatic adjective rather than a neutral description

    According to a blistering New York Post report, Trump is eliminating 11 pools of unspent government funds that were…

    Used byThe Western Journal (Far Right)

  • Loaded verb

    listen to the howling beginMore neutral: listen to the criticism that follows

    Mocks critics' reactions rather than describing their objections neutrally

    …any means, but boy, just propose cutting spending on these people and listen to the howling begin, mostly (but not exclusively) from Democrats.

    Used byRedState (Far Right)

  • Sensational language

    dropped another bombshellMore neutral: announced another funding cut

    Uses dramatic language to describe a routine policy announcement

    Case in point: On Friday, the Trump administration dropped another bombshell on federal spending, this time mostly on programs designed to aid illegal…

    Used byRedState (Far Right)

  • Dehumanizing label

    illegal aliensMore neutral: people who are in the country illegally

    Term reduces people to a legal-status category in a way that carries pejorative connotation beyond neutral description

    …bombshell on federal spending, this time mostly on programs designed to aid illegal aliens with taxpayer money.

    Used byRedState (Far Right)

  • Loaded modifier

    legally questionable maneuverMore neutral: a maneuver whose legality has been disputed

    Characterizes the legality of the action as doubtful in the outlet's own voice rather than attributing the assessment to a specific source.

    …the Impoundment Control Act to deploy a "pocket rescission" of funds, a legally questionable maneuver Trump also used in 2025 to claw back billions in appropriated funds for…

    Used byABC News (Left)

  • Delegitimizing label

    so-called pocket rescissionMore neutral: a rescission mechanism known as a pocket rescission

    The phrase casts doubt on the legitimacy of an established budget term rather than simply naming it neutrally.

    The so-called pocket rescission claws back money already appropriated by Congress, with little time for…

    Used byRoll Call (Center)

  • Loaded verb

    Claws BackMore neutral: Cancels

    Describes a routine budgetary action with an aggressive, predatory verb rather than a neutral term like ‘cancels’ or ‘rescinds.’

    White House Claws Back $810 Million Going To Left-Wing Passion Projects

    Used byThe Daily Wire (Far Right)

  • Partisan shorthand

    Left-Wing Passion ProjectsMore neutral: Diversity and immigrant-services programs

    Labels the funded programs with a dismissive partisan term rather than describing them neutrally.

    White House Claws Back $810 Million Going To Left-Wing Passion Projects

    Used byThe Daily Wire (Far Right)

  • Loaded verb

    hit Black-owned businesses and Black communitiesMore neutral: affected Black-owned businesses and Black communities

    Presents the effect of the cuts on these communities as an established fact using an emotionally charged verb rather than attributing the characterization to a source.

    …programs, adding to earlier administration actions that have hit Black-owned businesses and Black communities.

    Used byTheGrio (Left)

  • Sensational language

    has lawmakers scramblingMore neutral: has drawn objections from some lawmakers

    Adds dramatic flair to lawmakers’ reaction rather than describing it factually.

    …the return of federal funds, the rare action by President Donald Trump has lawmakers scrambling, with some members calling it an illegal check on Congress’ power of the…

    Used byThe Daily Signal (Far Right)

  • Euphemism

    ReturningMore neutral: Cancelling

    Frames the cancellation of appropriated funds as simply ‘returning’ money, softening what is a contested rescission of congressionally approved spending.

    Trump Checks Congress, Returning Half a Billion in Funds Set Aside for Illegal Immigrants

    Used byThe Daily Signal (Far Right)

  • Dehumanizing label

    Set Aside for Illegal ImmigrantsMore neutral: Set aside for refugee and immigrant services

    Characterizes funds meant for refugees, asylees and unaccompanied children as going to ‘illegal immigrants,’ a legally inaccurate and loaded label for that population.

    Trump Checks Congress, Returning Half a Billion in Funds Set Aside for Illegal Immigrants

    Used byThe Daily Signal (Far Right)

  • Sensational language

    getting zero pushbackMore neutral: getting little public opposition

    Uses an absolute, dramatic phrase to characterize political reaction rather than a measured description.

    …to cancel close to $1 billion of funds already appropriated by Congress is getting zero pushback from Republicans on Capitol Hill.

    Used byThe New Republic (Far Left)

  • Loaded modifier

    Republicans SilentMore neutral: Republicans Offer Little Public Pushback

    Characterizes the absence of public criticism as ‘silence,’ implying complicity or wrongdoing rather than neutrally describing the lack of stated opposition.

    Republicans Silent as Trump Cuts Nearly $1 Billion Passed by Congress

    Used byThe New Republic (Far Left)

  • Loaded verb

    clawed backMore neutral: canceled

    The verb frames the funding cancellation as an aggressive seizure rather than a neutral budgetary action.

    …rescissions as part of the next spending package after President Donald Trump clawed back $810 million in congressionally approved funding.

    Used byWashington Examiner (Right)

  • Loaded modifier

    precarious moment for the GOPMore neutral: a politically sensitive moment for the GOP

    Characterizes the political situation of one party in a way that goes beyond stating facts.

    …the White House and members of Trump's own party at a particularly precarious moment for the GOP.

    Used byThe Hill (Center)

  • Loaded modifier

    controversial budgeting maneuverMore neutral: a disputed budgeting maneuver

    Labels the maneuver as controversial without attributing the judgement to a specific party.

    …of millions of dollars in federal funding approved by Congress using a controversial budgeting maneuver faces a legal challenge on the eve of the end of the fiscal year, when…

    Used byBloomberg (Left)

  • Sensational language

    do-or-die cliffMore neutral: funding deadline

    Adds dramatic urgency beyond what the facts require to describe an expiring funding deadline.

    Unspent healthcare funding faces do-or-die cliff

    Used byThe Hill (Center)

  • Loaded verb

    fail to stopMore neutral: do not stop

    Frames Democrats’ unsuccessful effort in terms of failure rather than neutrally describing the outcome.

    Democrats fail to stop Trump from canceling $810M in funds approved by Congress

    Used byThe Washington Post (Left)

  • Partisan shorthand

    one-man Department of Government EfficiencyMore neutral: acting unilaterally to cut spending

    Frames the president’s unilateral action in approving, politically loaded terms tied to a specific political initiative.

    President Donald Trump became a one-man Department of Government Efficiency this week by wielding a rarely used presidential power: The pocket…

    Used byRedState (Far Right)

  • Dehumanizing label

    spend-lusting senatorsMore neutral: senators who favor the spending

    Reduces senators to a derogatory caricature based on policy disagreement rather than describing their positions factually.

    The presidential action flabbergasted the spend-lusting senators in Washington, D.C.

    Used byRedState (Far Right)

  • Sensational language

    CheckmatedMore neutral: Blocked

    Dramatizes a legislative outcome as a decisive political defeat rather than describing the procedural result.

    Schumer Checkmated on Plan to Block Trump Spending Cuts

    Used byRedState (Far Right)

Words quoted from someone else (2)Hide the quoted words

Loaded words that outlets reported someone else saying. They show what was said, not how the outlet chose to say it.

  • Loaded modifier

    Quoted

    the most harmful government spendingMore neutral: spending the administration says should be eliminated

    This is a value-laden characterization of the spending, though it is attributed to the Office of Management and Budget as a quotation.

    …of management and budget described the funding cut as focused on “the most harmful government spending”.

    Quoted byThe Guardian (Left)

    Inside a quotation: the outlets are reporting someone else’s words.

  • Delegitimizing label

    Quoted

    unlawfulMore neutral: disputed

    The term asserts a legal conclusion that is contested, though it is presented as a quotation from lawmakers.

    Lawmakers slam Trump’s ‘unlawful’ move to cut $810 million in federal funds

    Quoted byNBC News (Left)

    Inside a quotation: the outlets are reporting someone else’s words.

See the full language guide

See for yourself

Side by side

What each side leads with and what it leaves out. Open a side to read its headlines.

From the left

12 outlets

Leads with

  • Legality of the maneuver
  • Bipartisan criticism
  • Impact on immigrant and diversity-focused services

Leaves out

  • Republican lawmakers’ specific objections (as detailed by The Hill)

Reported by other sides, not found in this side’s coverage.

See the 13 headlines from the leftHide the headlines
  • The Washington PostLeft

    Democrats Loaded verb“fail to stop”Frames Democrats’ unsuccessful effort in terms of failure rather than neutrally describing the outcome.More neutral: do not stopDisagree with this highlight? Trump from canceling $810M in funds approved by Congress

    Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wisconsin) blocked the effort, meaning the Trump administration will succeed in eliminating the funding it deemed “wasteful.”

    Read at The Washington Post (opens in a new tab)
    1 more from The Washington Post
  • BloombergLeft

    Trump Sued Over Move to Claw Back Federal Funds Set to Expire

    A White House plan to cut hundreds of millions of dollars in federal funding approved by Congress using a Loaded modifier“controversial budgeting maneuver”Labels the maneuver as controversial without attributing the judgement to a specific party.More neutral: a disputed budgeting maneuverDisagree with this highlight? faces a legal challenge on the eve of the end of the fiscal year, when the money is set to expire.

    Read at Bloomberg (opens in a new tab)
  • The New RepublicFar Left

    Loaded modifier“Republicans Silent”Characterizes the absence of public criticism as ‘silence,’ implying complicity or wrongdoing rather than neutrally describing the lack of stated opposition.More neutral: Republicans Offer Little Public PushbackDisagree with this highlight? as Trump Cuts Nearly $1 Billion Passed by Congress

    President Trump’s move last week to cancel close to $1 billion of funds already appropriated by Congress is getting zero pushback from Republicans on Capitol Hill. …

    Read at The New Republic (opens in a new tab)
  • TheGrioLeft

    Trump administration moves to cut $810 million, including funds for minority-owned businesses

    The funding package also targets housing counseling and other programs as the White House uses a disputed pocket-rescission tactic. The

    Read at TheGrio (opens in a new tab)
  • NPRLeft

    What to know about the $810 million in spending canceled by President Trump

    President Trump announced plans to cancel $810 million in Congressionally approved spending, a move that some in his own party are calling illegal.

    Read at NPR (opens in a new tab)
    1 more from NPR
  • TIMELeft

    What Is a ‘Pocket Rescission’? Inside Trump’s Move to Cancel $810 Million in Federal Funding

    The Trump Administration is seeking to claw back spending approved for programs serving immigrants, minority groups, and children.

    Read at TIME (opens in a new tab)
  • ABC NewsLeft

    White House orders over $800M in funds rescinded

    The White House announced Friday evening that it was rescinding over $800 million in congressionally appropriated funds across a range of government programs.

    Read at ABC News (opens in a new tab)
  • NBC NewsLeft

    Lawmakers Loaded verb“slam”"Slam" is a dramatic verb that amplifies the intensity of lawmakers' criticism beyond a neutral description.More neutral: criticizeDisagree with this highlight? Trump’s ‘Delegitimizing label“unlawful”The term asserts a legal conclusion that is contested, though it is presented as a quotation from lawmakers.More neutral: disputedThis appears inside a quotation. The outlet is reporting someone else’s words.Disagree with this highlight?’ move to cut $810 million in federal funds

    The White House said Friday that it planned to cut $810 million in bipartisan, congressionally approved funding, spurring criticism from lawmakers on both sides of the aisle.

    Read at NBC News (opens in a new tab)
  • CBS NewsLeft

    Trump cancels nearly $1 billion in spending, a move some lawmakers called illegal

    President Trump moved to cancel almost $1 billion in spending that was approved by Congress, marking the second time his administration has employed a rarely used tactic that some lawmakers in both parties have called illegal.

    Read at CBS News (opens in a new tab)
  • The New York TimesLeft

    Trump Proposes $810 Million in Education and Health Cuts, Loaded verb“Defying Congress”Characterizes the action as defiance rather than as the use of a claimed statutory authority, which is the contested question.More neutral: Seeking to cancel funds Congress approvedDisagree with this highlight?

    The attempted clawback represents the second time in as many years that the White House has sought to cancel funding approved by lawmakers.

    Read at The New York Times (opens in a new tab)
  • The GuardianLeft

    Trump cancels nearly $1bn in funding approved by Congress

    President using rare power to revoke expenditure with bipartisan approval to aid immigrant services Donald Trump is canceling nearly $1bn in spending approved by Congress, the White House announced on Friday, using a rare and contested power to axe funding for immigrant services …

    Read at The Guardian (opens in a new tab)
  • ABC NewsLeftAssociated Press report

    Trump administration uses rare authority to claw back nearly $1B in spending approved by Congress

    President Donald Trump is canceling nearly $1 billion in spending approved by Congress

    Read at ABC News (opens in a new tab)

    Also published by HuffPost and PBS NewsHour. It counts once.

  • HuffPostFar LeftAssociated Press report

    Trump Administration Uses Rare Authority To Claw Back Nearly $1B In Spending Approved By Congress

    HuffPost published a report that is shown in full at ABC News.

    Read at HuffPost (opens in a new tab)

From the center

5 outlets

Leads with

  • Power-of-the-purse dispute
  • Lawmaker reactions from both parties
  • Procedural mechanics of a pocket rescission
See the 5 headlines from the centerHide the headlines

From the right

8 outlets · 1 opinion

Leads with

  • Reducing wasteful or 'harmful' spending
  • Funding tied to illegal immigration and diversity programs
  • Administration’s broader spending-cut efforts

Leaves out

  • Bipartisan legal objections to the maneuver
  • Republican lawmakers’ criticism of the move

Reported by other sides, not found in this side’s coverage.

See the 9 headlines from the rightHide the headlines
  • Washington ExaminerRight

    Collins exploring pocket rescissions ban after Trump cancels $810 million in federal spending

    Senate appropriators are exploring a ban on pocket rescissions as part of the next spending package after President Donald Trump Loaded verb“clawed back”The verb frames the funding cancellation as an aggressive seizure rather than a neutral budgetary action.More neutral: canceledDisagree with this highlight? $810 million in congressionally approved funding. …

    Read at Washington Examiner (opens in a new tab)
  • The Daily SignalFar Right

    Trump Checks Congress, Euphemism“Returning”Frames the cancellation of appropriated funds as simply ‘returning’ money, softening what is a contested rescission of congressionally approved spending.More neutral: CancellingDisagree with this highlight? Half a Billion in Funds Dehumanizing label“Set Aside for Illegal Immigrants”Characterizes funds meant for refugees, asylees and unaccompanied children as going to ‘illegal immigrants,’ a legally inaccurate and loaded label for that population.More neutral: Set aside for refugee and immigrant servicesDisagree with this highlight?

    The White House returned over half a billion dollars previously appropriated by Congress for programs serving illegal immigrants. While conservatives praised the return of federal funds, the rare action by President Donald Trump has lawmakers scrambling, with some members …

    Read at The Daily Signal (opens in a new tab)
  • The Daily WireFar Right

    White House Loaded verb“Claws Back”Describes a routine budgetary action with an aggressive, predatory verb rather than a neutral term like ‘cancels’ or ‘rescinds.’More neutral: CancelsDisagree with this highlight? $810 Million Going To Partisan shorthand“Left-Wing Passion Projects”Labels the funded programs with a dismissive partisan term rather than describing them neutrally.More neutral: Diversity and immigrant-services programsDisagree with this highlight?

    The White House is moving to claw back $810 million in taxpayer funding for programs ranging from services for non-citizens to minority business programs, transgender health research, international education, and housing counseling. …

    Read at The Daily Wire (opens in a new tab)
  • The Daily CallerFar Right

    Trump Invokes Rare Authority To Cancel Nearly $1,000,000,000 In Congressionally Approved Spending

    Supreme Court Let That Cancellation Stand

    Read at The Daily Caller (opens in a new tab)
  • The Western JournalFar Right

    Trump Slashes Over $800M in Government Funding Earmarked for Illegal Immigrants: Report

    President Donald Trump is taking an axe to a number of government funding programs that he deems are no longer needed. And it’s going to reduce government spending by nearly

    Read at The Western Journal (opens in a new tab)
  • Fox NewsFar Right

    Trump revives rare budget maneuver to rescind $810M in congressionally approved funds

    Trump used a pocket rescission to cancel $810 million in approved spending on refugee programs, diversity initiatives and migrant education.

    Read at Fox News (opens in a new tab)
  • The Epoch TimesFar Right

    Trump Rescinds Nearly $1 Billion in Congress-Approved Funding

    The White House said the president would utilize ‘all possible tools’ to cut wasteful and harmful government spending.

    Read at The Epoch Times (opens in a new tab)
  • The Washington TimesRight

    White House Loaded verb“maneuvers around Congress”Implies evasive or underhanded action rather than describing the legal mechanism neutrallyMore neutral: bypasses CongressDisagree with this highlight? to cut $810 million with 'pocket rescission'

    The White House late Friday announced it was cutting nearly $810 million in congressionally appropriated funding for programs that provide aid to illegal immigrants and serve race-based missions.

    Read at The Washington Times (opens in a new tab)
  • RedStateFar RightOpinion

    Schumer Sensational language“Checkmated”Dramatizes a legislative outcome as a decisive political defeat rather than describing the procedural result.More neutral: BlockedDisagree with this highlight? on Plan to Block Trump Spending Cuts

    President Donald Trump became a one-man Department of Government Efficiency this week by wielding a rarely used presidential power: The pocket rescission.

    Read at RedState (opens in a new tab)
    1 more from RedState

Articles you open from here build My Mix, a private picture of how your reading spreads across the spectrum, kept on this device. What is My Mix?

The left is Far Left and Left together. The right is Right and Far Right together. Every outlet keeps its own five-point rating.

Who reported it when

How the coverage built up

  • Left

    15 min later

    Its first report, Sep 25, 8:27 PM EDT

  • Center

    17 hr 7 min later

    Its first report, Sep 26, 1:20 PM EDT

  • Right

    First to report

    The Washington Times, Sep 25, 8:13 PM EDT

See the order the outlets reported inHide the order
  1. The Washington TimesRightSep 25, 8:13 PM EDT
  2. ABC NewsLeftSep 25, 8:27 PM EDT
  3. The GuardianLeftSep 25, 9:00 PM EDT
  4. The New York TimesLeftSep 25, 9:05 PM EDT
  5. CBS NewsLeftSep 25, 9:38 PM EDT
  6. HuffPostFar LeftSep 25, 10:15 PM EDT
  7. The Epoch TimesFar RightSep 25, 11:32 PM EDT
  8. NBC NewsLeftSep 26, 12:08 AM EDT
  9. Fox NewsFar RightSep 26, 8:27 AM EDT
  10. The Western JournalFar RightSep 26, 9:00 AM EDT
  11. PBS NewsHourCenterSep 26, 1:20 PM EDT
  12. CNBCCenterSep 26, 2:46 PM EDT
  13. The Washington PostLeftSep 26, 3:26 PM EDT
  14. The Daily CallerFar RightSep 26, 3:37 PM EDT
  15. TIMELeftSep 26, 5:14 PM EDT
  16. Straight Arrow NewsCenterSep 26, 6:29 PM EDT
  17. Roll CallCenterSep 28, 2:17 AM EDT
  18. NPRLeftSep 28, 5:00 AM EDT
  19. The Daily WireFar RightSep 28, 9:48 AM EDT
  20. TheGrioLeftSep 28, 12:07 PM EDT
  21. The Daily SignalFar RightSep 28, 4:30 PM EDT
  22. The New RepublicFar LeftSep 28, 4:39 PM EDT
  23. Washington ExaminerRightSep 28, 9:07 PM EDT
  24. The HillCenterSep 29, 10:15 AM EDT
  25. BloombergLeftSep 29, 5:59 PM EDT

Times are the ones the outlets published in their own feeds, in Eastern time. Opinion is left out.

Read next

Help someone else find the truth beneath the surface

Most people see one side of a story. Share this one, so they can see how every side is telling it and decide for themselves.

Email it

Seen a mistake? Tell us what is wrong with this page