Skip to content

PoliticsDeveloping

UK Green Party Votes to Declare Zionism a Form of Racism

By

Coverage spectrum

Covered by 7 outlets across the spectrum.

18 articles in total, 1 of them opinion. The spectrum counts each outlet once and leaves opinion out. How we measure bias

The Green Party of England and Wales voted 1,022 to 813 at its annual conference in Brighton to adopt a motion defining Zionism as a form of racism and calling for a “single democratic Palestinian state in all of historic Palestine.” Party leader Zack Polanski did not attend the vote, choosing instead to campaign ahead of a London byelection; four of the party’s five MPs opposed the motion. Israel’s foreign ministry condemned the move, compared the party to Hamas, and banned Polanski from entering Israel. Jewish Greens chair Vivien Lichtenstein said she may leave the party, and nine Labour MPs asked Sussex Police to investigate possible antisemitic offences at the conference.

Headline and summary written by Mantle’s AI from the coverage below, under published rules. How this works

What happened

Key points

Each point shows who reports it, from Far Left to Far Right.

  1. The motion passed 1,022 to 813 at the Green Party conference in Brighton on Sunday.

    Reported byLeftCenterRight

  2. The motion declares Zionism a form of racism and calls for a single democratic Palestinian state in historic Palestine.

    Reported byLeftCenterRight

  3. Israel's foreign ministry condemned the motion and banned Zack Polanski from entering Israel.

    Reported byLeftCenterRight

  4. Zack Polanski did not attend the vote, instead campaigning for a byelection in Holborn and St Pancras.

    Reported byLeftCenter

  5. Vivien Lichtenstein, chair of the Jewish Greens, said she may leave the party over the vote.

    Reported byLeftCenter

Show 2 more pointsShow fewer points

  1. Four of the party's five MPs opposed the motion.

    Reported byLeftCenter

  2. Nine Labour MPs asked Sussex Police to investigate possible antisemitic offences linked to the conference.

    Reported byCenter

What is contested

Where accounts differ

Points the coverage does not agree on, and who says what.

  • Whether the motion amounts to calling for the destruction or elimination of Israel.

    Right-leaning outlets (New York Post, Breitbart) describe the motion as effectively calling for Israel's destruction or 'wiping out Israel'; the motion itself and other outlets describe it as calling for a 'single democratic state with equal rights' in historic Palestine, without using that language.

  • Whether comparing the Green Party to Hamas is accurate.

    Israel's foreign ministry said the Greens adopted 'the ideology' of Hamas; Truthout characterizes this comparison as 'specious,' while other outlets report the claim without evaluating it.

  • Whether more effort from Polanski could have prevented the motion's passage.

    The Guardian reports some Green members believe greater involvement by Polanski could have stopped the motion; Polanski's camp has framed his absence as a scheduling conflict tied to byelection campaigning.

How each side tells it

Compare views

  • the left

    2 outlets · 1 opinion

    Left-leaning outlets, mostly original reporting, focus on internal party fallout and Lichtenstein's possible departure, with Al Jazeera and Truthout also centering Israel's condemnation and historical comparisons to other anti-Zionism votes.

    Tuesday briefing: Why the Green party’s Zionism vote has caused a backlash
    The GuardianLeftAll left-leaning headlines

  • the center

    3 outlets

    Center outlets, largely BBC and wire-style reporting, emphasize the internal tensions exposed by the vote, Lichtenstein's comments, and subsequent institutional fallout including Polanski's response and the police referral.

    I won't accept exclusion, says Polanski after criticism of Zionist motion
    BBC NewsCenterAll center headlines

  • the right

    2 outlets

    Right-leaning outlets, including two Breitbart reports and the New York Post, frame the vote as evidence of the party's shift to a far-left, anti-Israel position, with some describing the motion as effectively calling for Israel's destruction.

    UK Green Leader Polanski Banned From Israel After Party Backs 'Zionism Is Racism' Motion
    Breitbart NewsFar RightAll right-leaning headlines

The words they chose

Language to notice

Words that carry a judgement beyond the facts. Tap a highlighted word anywhere on the page to see why.

  • Left5

    has alarmed some Jewish memberswill dismay the bulk of the party’s MPslashed outlashes out

  • Center1

    attack

  • Right7

    shift towards Islamic interestsheavily courting the Islamic voteIslamo-populismFar-Left

In the outlets’ own words

  • Vague attribution

    has alarmed some Jewish membersMore neutral: has drawn concern from some Jewish members

    Describes a reaction attributed to unnamed Jewish members without specifying who or how many.

    Motion that has alarmed some Jewish members is passed by 1,022 votes to 813 at party’s annual conference in Brighton…

    Used byThe Guardian (Left)

  • Vague attribution

    will dismay the bulk of the party’s MPsMore neutral: is expected to be unpopular with many of the party’s MPs

    Attributes a reaction to an unnamed group of MPs without naming them or citing evidence.

    …adopted a policy which equates Zionism with racism, a move that will dismay the bulk of the party’s MPs and has alarmed some Jewish members.

    Used byThe Guardian (Left)

  • Loaded verb

    attackMore neutral: criticize

    Characterizes criticism as an ‘attack,’ which is more combative than a neutral description of the groups’ statements.

    Jewish groups attack Greens after anti-Zionism motion passes

    Used byFinancial Times (Center)

  • Loaded modifier

    shift towards Islamic interestsMore neutral: changing coalition of supporters

    Presents a contested characterization of the party’s political motivations as settled fact.

    …is racism" at its conference on Sunday, as the party continues to shift towards Islamic interests from its former focus on the environment.

    Used byBreitbart News (Far Right)

Show 9 more phrasesShow fewer

  • Loaded verb

    heavily courting the Islamic voteMore neutral: seeking support from Muslim voters

    Implies a calculated, cynical political strategy rather than describing voter outreach neutrally.

    After heavily courting the Islamic vote, which traditionally backed the governing left-wing Labour Party but…

    Used byBreitbart News (Far Right)

  • Partisan shorthand

    Islamo-populismMore neutral: appeal to Muslim voters

    Coins a politically loaded term that frames the party’s position in a pejorative ideological category.

    …the rank and file of the Green Party firmly planted their flag on the side of Islamo-populism.

    Used byBreitbart News (Far Right)

  • Loaded modifier

    Far-LeftMore neutral: UK Green Party

    Uses an ideological label as a pejorative descriptor rather than a neutral identifier.

    Far-Left UK Greens Adopt Motion Declaring 'Zionism Is Racism' as Party Policy

    Used byBreitbart News (Far Right)

  • Loaded verb

    lashed outMore neutral: responded or criticized

    Implies loss of control.

    Israel, as well as British Jewish groups, lashed out on Sunday following the vote by the small political party.

    Used byAl Jazeera English (Left)

  • Loaded verb

    lashes outMore neutral: responds critically

    Portrays Israel’s response as an emotional outburst rather than a neutral statement of condemnation.

    Israel lashes out as UK’s Green Party formally defines Zionism as ‘racism’

    Used byAl Jazeera English (Left)

  • Loaded modifier

    far-left socialist groupMore neutral: left-wing party

    Attaches an intensified ideological label beyond simply describing the party's political orientation.

    The far-left socialist group, which started as an environmentalist movement, backed the amendment 1,022 to…

    Used byNew York Post (Right)

  • Sensational language

    backs wiping out IsraelMore neutral: backs single-state resolution

    Characterizes the motion's call for a single state as the elimination of Israel rather than describing its actual stated terms.

    Green Party in UK declares ‘Zionism is racism’ — and backs wiping out Israel

    Used byNew York Post (Right)

  • Sensational language

    uproarMore neutral: controversy

    Adds dramatic weight to the reaction rather than describing it factually.

    Israel condemns the move as the party's vote causes an uproar, including among party members.

    Used byAl Jazeera English (Left)

  • Loaded modifier

    far-left leaderMore neutral: Green Party leader

    Uses an intensified ideological label to characterize Polanski rather than a neutral descriptor.

    The far-left leader of the British Green Party, Zack Polanski, has been banned from entering the…

    Used byBreitbart News (Far Right)

Words quoted from someone else (3)Hide the quoted words

Loaded words that outlets reported someone else saying. They show what was said, not how the outlet chose to say it.

  • Delegitimizing label

    Quoted

    antisemitic lieMore neutral: what it called a false and antisemitic claim

    A strong characterization attributed to a specific speaker should be flagged though it is quoted.

    Israel's president declared that the 'antisemitic lie' deliberately endangers Jews and Israelis.

    Quoted byAl Jazeera English (Left)

    Inside a quotation: the outlets are reporting someone else’s words.

  • Delegitimizing label

    Quoted

    legitimacy to terrorismMore neutral: support for groups it considers militant

    A strong accusatory phrase attributed to the Israeli government that frames the party as supporting terrorism.

    …government declared that it now views the left-leaning Greens as giving “legitimacy to terrorism”.

    Quoted byAl Jazeera English (Left)

    Inside a quotation: the outlets are reporting someone else’s words.

  • Delegitimizing label

    Quoted

    a body that gives legitimacy to terrorismMore neutral: a body Israel says legitimizes terrorism

    A strong accusatory label attributed to the Israeli government rather than an established fact.

    …from the Israeli government which said it now viewed the party as "a body that gives legitimacy to terrorism".

    Quoted byFrance 24 (Center)

    Inside a quotation: the outlets are reporting someone else’s words.

See the full language guide

See for yourself

Side by side

What each side leads with and what it leaves out. Open a side to read its headlines.

From the left

2 outlets · 1 opinion

Leads with

  • internal party divisions
  • possible departure of Jewish Greens chair
  • Israel's reaction and ban on Polanski
  • historical/political context of Zionism

Leaves out

  • Labour MPs' referral to Sussex Police
  • electoral implications for the party

Reported by other sides, not found in this side’s coverage.

See the 3 headlines from the leftHide the headlines

From the center

3 outlets

Leads with

  • internal party tensions
  • Lichtenstein's remarks
  • Polanski's public response
  • electoral and institutional consequences
See the 3 headlines from the centerHide the headlines

From the right

2 outlets

Leads with

  • party's far-left/anti-Israel characterization
  • Polanski's Israel ban
  • the one-state call as elimination of Israel

Leaves out

  • Lichtenstein's internal dissent
  • Labour MPs' police referral

Reported by other sides, not found in this side’s coverage.

See the 2 headlines from the rightHide the headlines

Articles you open from here build My Mix, a private picture of how your reading spreads across the spectrum, kept on this device. What is My Mix?

The left is Far Left and Left together. The right is Right and Far Right together. Every outlet keeps its own five-point rating.

Who reported it when

How the coverage built up

  • Left

    First to report

    The Guardian, Oct 4, 10:15 AM EDT

  • Center

    45 min later

    Its first report, Oct 4, 11:00 AM EDT

  • Right

    2 hr 8 min later

    Its first report, Oct 4, 12:23 PM EDT

See the order the outlets reported inHide the order
  1. The GuardianLeftOct 4, 10:15 AM EDT
  2. BBC NewsCenterOct 4, 11:00 AM EDT
  3. Financial TimesCenterOct 4, 11:31 AM EDT
  4. Breitbart NewsFar RightOct 4, 12:23 PM EDT
  5. Al Jazeera EnglishLeftOct 4, 4:38 PM EDT
  6. New York PostRightOct 4, 5:02 PM EDT
  7. France 24CenterOct 5, 5:44 AM EDT

Times are the ones the outlets published in their own feeds, in Eastern time. Opinion is left out.

Read next

Help someone else find the truth beneath the surface

Most people see one side of a story. Share this one, so they can see how every side is telling it and decide for themselves.

Email it

Seen a mistake? Tell us what is wrong with this page