Skip to content

TechnologyBreaking

Homeland Security orders federal agencies to remove DeepSeek products

By

Coverage spectrum

Covered by 10 outlets across the spectrum.

12 articles in total, 1 of them opinion. The spectrum counts each outlet once and leaves opinion out. How we measure bias

Photo of a screen showing DeepSeek's blue whale logo and greeting text
Image via The HillHow images are chosenReport this image

The Department of Homeland Security has ordered federal civilian agencies to stop buying and remove products from the Chinese AI company DeepSeek, according to a DHS notice. The Hill reports the notice also bars government contracting and covers tools that third parties build with DeepSeek technology. The notice says DeepSeek’s models present “multiple threat vectors”. The Guardian, citing AFP, quotes the defense department warning that use may result in the transfer of sensitive data to China. Outlets differ on whether the notice was published Monday or Tuesday.

Headline and summary written by Mantle’s AI from the coverage below, under published rules. How this works

What happened

Key points

Each point shows who reports it, from Far Left to Far Right.

  1. The Department of Homeland Security has ordered federal civilian agencies to remove DeepSeek products from their systems.

    Reported byLeft1Center4Right2Far Right2See the outletsHide the outlets
    Left
    The Guardian
    Center
    BBC News, The Hill, CNBC, Semafor
    Right
    New York Post, The Washington Times
    Far Right
    The Epoch Times, RedState

  2. The order also bars government contracting for DeepSeek products and covers third-party tools built on DeepSeek technology.

    Reported byLeft1Center1Far Right1See the outletsHide the outlets
    Left
    The Guardian
    Center
    The Hill
    Far Right
    The Epoch Times

  3. The notice says DeepSeek’s AI models present “multiple threat vectors”.

    Reported byCenter1Right1See the outletsHide the outlets
    Center
    The Hill
    Right
    New York Post

  4. The defense department warns that use of the tools may result in the transfer of sensitive data to China, according to the Guardian’s AFP report.

    One outletThe Guardian· Left

  5. The order was first issued in July, according to The Hill.

    One outletThe Hill· Center

What is contested

Where accounts differ

Points the coverage does not agree on, and who says what.

  • The DHS notice was published on Monday.

    The Hill and the Guardian report the notice came out Monday; the Washington Times says it was published Tuesday.

How each side tells it

Compare views

Every side reports that the Department of Homeland Security has ordered federal agencies to remove DeepSeek products and bar related purchases. Left and center stress the ban amid the US-China tech rivalry, while the right calls it a crackdown on a Chinese firm.

  • the left

    2 outlets

    The only left-side coverage is an AFP report carried by the Guardian, whose headline states the US ban on DeepSeek tools plainly and names the China race.

    US bans use of China’s DeepSeek AI tools by government agencies
    The GuardianLeftAll left-leaning headlines

  • the center

    4 outlets

    Center headlines state the removal order plainly, with several placing it within the US-China tech rivalry.

    DHS orders removal of DeepSeek from government agency IT systems
    The HillCenterAll center headlines

  • the right

    4 outlets · 1 opinion

    Right-side headlines name the agency and a ban or crackdown; the Far Right RedState opinion piece frames it as overdue and as a Trump administration action.

    Homeland Security bans DeepSeek from federal civilian agency systems
    The Washington TimesRightAll right-leaning headlines

The words they chose

Language to notice

Words that carry a judgement beyond the facts. Tap a highlighted word anywhere on the page to see why.

  • Left0

    No loaded words in its own voice.

  • Center0

    No loaded words in its own voice.

  • Right4

    cracks downkicking it outnot a moment too soonGets the Boot

In the outlets’ own words

  • Loaded verb

    cracks downMore neutral: orders removal of

    ‘Cracks down’ suggests forceful suppression, while the reported action is a removal and procurement directive.

    DHS cracks down on China’s DeepSeek as AI competition intensifies: ‘Multiple threat vectors’

    Used byNew York Post (Right)

  • Loaded verb

    kicking it outMore neutral: removing it

    The idiom adds informal drama to a plain administrative removal order.

    Now the Trump administration is kicking it out, and not a moment too soon.

    Used byRedState (Far Right)

  • Sensational language

    not a moment too soon

    The phrase is the writer’s own approval of the order, which goes beyond the facts reported.

    Now the Trump administration is kicking it out, and not a moment too soon.

    Used byRedState (Far Right)

  • Loaded verb

    Gets the BootMore neutral: is removed

    The colloquial phrase adds mockery to a government action that other outlets describe as a removal or ban.

    DeepSeek Gets the Boot As Trump Administration Cracks Down on Chinese AI

    Used byRedState (Far Right)

See the full language guide

See for yourself

Side by side

What each side leads with and what it leaves out. Open a side to read its headlines.

From the left

2 outlets

Leads with

  • the ban on government use
  • the AI race with China
  • risk of sensitive data transfer

Leaves out

  • the July start date of the order
  • the bar on government contracting

Reported by other sides, not found in this side’s coverage.

See the 2 headlines from the leftHide the headlines
  • The New York TimesLeft

    China Condemns U.S. Ban on DeepSeek A.I. in Government Systems

    The response came after Homeland Security ordered the removal and exclusion of products developed by the Chinese tech giant.

    Read at The New York Times (opens in a new tab)
  • The GuardianLeftAgence France-Presse report

    US bans use of China’s DeepSeek AI tools by government agencies

    Use of tools ‘may result in the transfer of sensitive data to (China)’, defense department says The US government on Monday ordered its agencies to stop using artificial intelligence (AI) tools from Chinese startup DeepSeek , as the countries race for dominance in the …

    Read at The Guardian (opens in a new tab)

From the center

4 outlets

Leads with

  • the DHS removal order
  • the US-China tech rivalry
  • the threat posed by the models
See the 4 headlines from the centerHide the headlines

From the right

4 outlets · 1 opinion

Leads with

  • a crackdown on a Chinese company
  • national security threat
  • removal from federal systems
See the 5 headlines from the rightHide the headlines
  • Breitbart NewsFar Right

    Trump Administration Orders Federal Agencies to Remove China's DeepSeek AI from Government Systems

    The Trump administration has formally banned the Chinese AI startup DeepSeek from civilian U.S. government IT systems over security concerns, the Department of Homeland Security disclosed Monday.

    Read at Breitbart News (opens in a new tab)
  • The Washington TimesRight

    Homeland Security bans DeepSeek from federal civilian agency systems

    The Department of Homeland Security has ordered federal civilian agencies to stop buying and remove products from Chinese artificial intelligence company DeepSeek, according to a notice published Tuesday.

    Read at The Washington Times (opens in a new tab)
  • New York PostRight

    DHS Loaded verb“cracks down”‘Cracks down’ suggests forceful suppression, while the reported action is a removal and procurement directive.More neutral: orders removal ofDisagree with this highlight? on China’s DeepSeek as AI competition intensifies: ‘Multiple threat vectors’

    The Department of Homeland Security has ordered federal civilian agencies to remove AI developed by China’s DeepSeek from their systems – the latest blow to a top Chinese model that has surged in popularity.

    Read at New York Post (opens in a new tab)
  • The Epoch TimesFar Right

    US Orders DeepSeek Removed From Federal Government Systems

    The restrictions also cover government contracts and third-party software using the Chinese company's AI technology.

    Read at The Epoch Times (opens in a new tab)
  • RedStateFar RightOpinion

    DeepSeek Loaded verb“Gets the Boot”The colloquial phrase adds mockery to a government action that other outlets describe as a removal or ban.More neutral: is removedDisagree with this highlight? As Trump Administration Cracks Down on Chinese AI

    DeepSeek has spent the past year making a name for itself in artificial intelligence. Now the Trump administration is Loaded verb“kicking it out”The idiom adds informal drama to a plain administrative removal order.More neutral: removing itDisagree with this highlight?, and not a moment too soon.

    Read at RedState (opens in a new tab)

Articles you open from here build My Mix, a private picture of how your reading spreads across the spectrum, kept on this device. What is My Mix?

The left is Far Left and Left together. The right is Right and Far Right together. Every outlet keeps its own five-point rating.

Who reported it when

How the coverage built up

  • Left

    18 hr 12 min later

    Its first report, Oct 20, 8:33 AM EDT

  • Center

    First to report

    BBC News, Oct 19, 2:21 PM EDT

  • Right

    3 hr 40 min later

    Its first report, Oct 19, 6:01 PM EDT

See the order the outlets reported inHide the order
  1. BBC NewsCenterOct 19, 2:21 PM EDT
  2. The HillCenterOct 19, 5:43 PM EDT
  3. The Epoch TimesFar RightOct 19, 6:01 PM EDT
  4. New York PostRightOct 19, 6:32 PM EDT
  5. CNBCCenterOct 20, 2:25 AM EDT
  6. SemaforCenterOct 20, 7:55 AM EDT
  7. The GuardianLeftOct 20, 8:33 AM EDT
  8. The Washington TimesRightOct 20, 10:37 AM EDT
  9. Breitbart NewsFar RightOct 20, 12:47 PM EDT
  10. The New York TimesLeftOct 20, 4:37 PM EDT

Times are the ones the outlets published in their own feeds, in Eastern time. Opinion is left out.

Read next

Help someone else find the truth beneath the surface

Most people see one side of a story. Share this one, so they can see how every side is telling it and decide for themselves.

Email it

Seen a mistake? Tell us what is wrong with this page